Ferrara Settles SweeTart Malic Acid Litigation

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
March 7, 2019

A California federal court has preliminarily approved a settlement agreement between a consumer and Ferrara Candy Co. alleging the company misleadingly advertised its SweeTarts as free of artificial flavors despite containing malic acid. Littlejohn v. Ferrara Candy Co., No. 18-0658 (S.D. Cal., entered February 28, 2019). Under the agreement, Ferrara will remove the phrase “no artificial flavors” from its packaging and marketing materials and pay $272,000 in attorney’s fees.

Categories: 9th Circuit, Issue 705, Litigation
Tags: artificial flavoring, California, malic

About The Author

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

For decades, manufacturers, distributors and retailers at every link in the food chain have come to Shook, Hardy & Bacon to partner with a legal team that understands the issues they face in today's evolving food production industry. Shook attorneys work with some of the world's largest food, beverage and agribusiness companies to establish preventative measures, conduct internal audits, develop public relations strategies, and advance tort reform initiatives.

Ferrara Settles SweeTart Malic Acid Litigation

About The Author

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Related Posts

Sugar Content of “Lightly Sweetened” Tea Challenged

KFC Franchisee Claims Company Never Disclosed Policy Barring Halal-Chicken Marketing

Chinese Firms Fined for Spreading KFC “Mutant Chicken” Rumors

Tips and Wage Suit Filed Against Celebrity Chef’s LA Restaurant