Following publication of an article titled “Sweet Little Lies,” Mother Jones
magazine has made available online the documents underlying the authors’
assertions of sugar-industry influence over government dietary policy and
scientific health effects research. Additional details about the article appear
in Issue 459 of this Update. Among the documents is one from 1942 that
purportedly “encouraged sugar cane and sugar beet producers to create a
joint research foundation to counter the ‘ignorance’ the industry was facing.”
It discusses World War II sugar rationing and campaigns “derogatory to sugar.”
A video featuring one of the article’s authors is also available online.

In a related development, writing in the Harvard College Global Health Review,
Dylan Neel calls for strict regulation of sugar, including taxation, reduced
availability, control of the location and density of retail markets, and tightened
vending machine and snack bar licensing. He claims in his October 24, 2012,
article “The Sugar Dilemma” that “[f]ailure to curb global sugar consumption
will condemn the world to yet another decade of rampant obesity, diabetes
and cancer.” According to Neel, non-communicable diseases contribute to
35 million deaths annually throughout the world and “[d]eveloping countries
must now bear the crippling double burden of both non-communicable and
communicable disease.” He contends that the recent surge in the incidence of
heart disease, cancer and diabetes is “undisputedly” attributable to “increased
dietary use of refined sugar.”

About The Author

For decades, manufacturers, distributors and retailers at every link in the food chain have come to Shook, Hardy & Bacon to partner with a legal team that understands the issues they face in today's evolving food production industry. Shook attorneys work with some of the world's largest food, beverage and agribusiness companies to establish preventative measures, conduct internal audits, develop public relations strategies, and advance tort reform initiatives.

Close