York University researchers have published a qualitative study examining “how obese women with and without binge eating disorder (BED) experience overeating in relation to the DSM-5 [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual] symptoms of addiction.” Claire Curtis & Caroline Davis, “A Qualitative Study of Binge Eating and Obesity From an Addiction Perspective,” Eating Disorders, January 2014. According to the study, the recently-published DSM-5 includes a new category for “Addiction and Related Disorders” that addresses “both substance use disorders (SUDs) and non-substance addictions” in addition to providing new diagnostic guidelines.

Using these expanded criteria, the authors interviewed 12 obese women with
BED and 12 without BED, concluding that “both groups of women endorsed
DSM-5 SUD criteria (in relation to food) in their narratives,” although there
were “visible qualitative differences in how the women experienced these
symptoms.” More specifically, Curtis and Davis reported that while both
groups expressed a desire to reduce their food intake, participants with BED
“focused on the uncontrollable aspect of binge eating” and were more likely
to describe their symptoms as a “craving,” “urge,” “desire,” or “constant thought.”

“Except for one person in the non-BED group, all participants in our study
met two or more criteria for a substance-use diagnosis (with food as the
substance) as specified in the DSM-5,” the study suggests. “All those who
self-identified as ‘addicted’ to food emphasized that it was only the highly
palatable ‘junk food’ to which they felt dependent. The sweet foods they
craved the most included candy, chocolate, cookies, brownies, ice cream, and
cakes. Given that many of these foods are also high in fat, it may not be sugar
alone that is driving their addictive feelings, but especially when it occurs in
combination with fat.”

In a related development, University of California, San Francisco, pediatric
endocrinologist Robert Lustig discusses the concept of food addiction in
a January 2, 2014, Atlantic article titled “The Sugar Addiction Taboo.” In
particular, he wonders whether food can truly be addictive “in the same
way that alcohol, tobacco, and street drugs are,” raising questions about the
necessity of fructose in the diet in addition to examining research focused
on sugar’s effects on the brain. “The concept of sugar addiction will continue
to evoke visceral responses on both sides of the aisle,” opines Lustig in the
end. “One thing most agree on is that sugar should be safe—and rare… The
industry feeds our sugar habit to the detriment of our society. We need food
purveyors, not food pushers.”

 

Issue 509

About The Author

For decades, manufacturers, distributors and retailers at every link in the food chain have come to Shook, Hardy & Bacon to partner with a legal team that understands the issues they face in today's evolving food production industry. Shook attorneys work with some of the world's largest food, beverage and agribusiness companies to establish preventative measures, conduct internal audits, develop public relations strategies, and advance tort reform initiatives.

Close