The National Salt Reduction Initiative (NSRI) has called on companies “to reduce the salt levels in 61 categories of packaged food and 25 classes of restaurant food,” issuing a list of proposed targets designed to cut the salt in these foods by 25 percent over five years. Led by the New York City Health Department, this partnership of cities, states and national health organizations apparently solicited input from the food industry in developing the proposed targets. NSRI will also accept additional comments until February 1, “especially from companies that have not yet participated in the target-setting process, as well as consumer organizations and other interested parties.” “Americans consume roughly twice the recommended limit of salt each day–causing widespread high blood pressure and placing millions at risk of heart attack and stroke–in ways that they cannot control on their own,” stated a January 11, 2010, press release, which noted that “some popular…
Category Archives Issue 333
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agriculture Marketing Service has issued a proposed rule that would amend the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances (National List) to reflect the recommendations of the National Organic Program Board (NOPB). The National List “identifies the synthetic substances that may be used and the nonsynthetic (natural) substances that may not be used in organic production,” as well as identifying “synthetic, nonsynthetic nonagricultural and nonorganic agricultural substances that may be used in organic handling.” The proposed rule would alter the National List to “amend the annotation for one exempted material (tetracycline) and add one substance (sulfurous acid) for use in organic crop production.” AMS will accept comments on the proposed rule until March 15, 2010. See Federal Register, January 12, 2009.
The American Soybean Association has reportedly submitted comments expressing concerns about agribusiness concentration to the Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in response to their recent initiative on competition and regulatory issues in the agriculture industry. According to ASA President Rob Joslin, “In recent years, we have seen increased consolidation in various agricultural industries. Many farmers have questioned why high levels of concentration have not been more thoroughly reviewed and analyzed by the federal government to determine their impact on competition.” See Southeast Farm Press, January 11, 2010. The agencies announced that they would be holding a number of joint public workshops to explore these issues in a November 2009 news release. Discussions about issues for crop farmers, “including seed technology, vertical integration, market transparency and buyer power” will take place in Ankeny, Iowa, on March 12, 2010; production contracts, concentration and buyer power in the poultry industry…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has published its notice about the availability of a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for genetically modified (GM) alfalfa. The agency was required to prepare the EIS by a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling finding that APHIS violated the National Environmental Protection Act by failing to do so in connection with its determination that the crop could be deregulated. Comments must be submitted by February 16, 2010, and public meetings will be held on January 19 in Las Vegas; February 3 in Kearney, Nebraska; February 4 in Lincoln, Nebraska; and February 9 in Riverdale, Maryland. See Federal Register, January 12, 2010. Meanwhile, Food & Water Watch, a consumer advocacy organization, is calling on supporters to take action on the EIS by telling the USDA “loud and clear that consumers want foods that are free from genetic…
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reportedly created a special communications committee to address food safety concerns related to dioxin. According to a January 15, 2010, Inside EPA article, a forthcoming EPA reassessment is expected to identify dioxin “as highly toxic and bioaccumulative with most exposure occurring through the food supply.” The agency apparently undertook the reevaluation after a 2006 National Academy of Sciences report advised EPA to update its risk assessment of 2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin (TCDD), a byproduct of combustions and other industrial processes. Inside EPA has anticipated that the pending EPA report will intensify public concerns “given existing data from the Food & Drug Administration (FDA),” which in 2009 reported that “over 95 percent of exposure arises from dietary intake of animal fats.” In addition, an EPA source has purportedly indicated that human body burdens are “probably” at levels higher than any reference dose recommended by the agency. Inside EPA…
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued a notice seeking public comments on a proposed set of self-regulatory guidelines submitted by i-SAFE, Inc. under the safe harbor provision of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule. Comments must be submitted by March 1, 2010. The organization that prepared the proposed guidelines is a non-profit that for some years has partnered with industry to provide educational programs for children about online safety issues. It recently determined that it would become involved in assisting and licensing online “operators” with children’s online privacy issues. Among other matters, the i-Safe guidelines would (i) provide notice to parents about the information collected from children by i-Safe licensees, (ii) require verifiable parental consent for the collection of personal information from children; and (iii) provide parents with an opportunity to view the information collected and prevent its further dissemination. See Federal Register, January 13, 2010. In recent years,…
12
