The United Kingdom (UK) has introduced a new country-of-origin-labeling (COOL) code of practice for pork and pork products. Launched at a recent National Farmers Union conference, the voluntary code was drawn up by the Pig Meat Supply Chain Task Force representing processors, pig producers, retailers, and the food-service sector. “A year ago I said that I wanted to end the nonsense of unclear country-of-origin labeling on pig meat products,” Environment Secretary Hilary Benn was quoted as saying. “I expect all major retailers to sign up and join those who have already decided to end the confusion for shoppers. If they don’t, their customers should ask them why they’re not in favor of clear, honest labeling.” The code reportedly aims to ensure that processed products will clearly identify country of origin for pork ingredients. Companies adhering to the new code have committed to providing clearer information such as “Produced in the…
Category Archives Issue 339
The European Commission (EC) has proposed that the European Union prohibit international trade in Atlantic bluefin tuna, favored by sushi eaters in Japan and elsewhere. According to the announcement, member states will discuss the proposal to reach a common EU position before the March 2010 meeting in Doha of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. While the EC is apparently concerned about the species’ “poor conservation status,” the trade ban would not take effect until 2011. According to a news source, environmental groups criticized the announcement, warning that a delay could encourage more fishing in the interim. See Financial Times, February 22, 2010.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has created a scientific cooperation (ESCO)working group “to collect and analyze information on the safety of substances” used in non-plastic food contact materials. Citing concern that certain substances, such as inks and adhesives, are migrating into foods, EFSA initiated the working group to “identify strengths and weaknesses in different approaches used for risk assessment, propose criteria for future safety evaluations and suggest further actions to be taken.” ESCO will present its findings to EFSA’s executive director by the end of March 2011. “Whilst EU rules specify that all materials coming into contact with foods must be safe, many non-plastic components of food contact materials—unlike plastic materials— are not subject to specific provisions at the European level,” states a February 22, 2010, EFSA press release.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has extended until March 3, 2010, the comment period for a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for genetically modified (GM) alfalfa. APHIS made an EIS available on January 12, 2010, after the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the agency violated the National Environmental Protection Act by failing to prepare an EIS in connection with its recommendation to deregulate the crop. See Federal Register, February 24, 2010.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) will hold a second meeting to discuss current product tracing systems for food intended for humans and animals. The March 10, 2010, meeting in Washington, D.C., specifically welcomes input on procedures for suppliers of source material used to produce raw ground beef products that test positive for E. coli. Issue 326 of this Update announced a similar meeting by FSIS and the Food and Drug Administration held in December 2009 that was designed to stimulate ideas on improving the agencies’ ability to “increase the speed and accuracy of the traceback investigations and traceforward operations.” See USDA website, February 22, 2010.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced a plan to address preventive controls aimed at reducing the risk of microbial contamination of fresh produce at farms and packing houses. The agency seeks information and public input so that it can develop safety standards and cooperative strategies to ensure compliance. FDA is requesting comments on topics including (i) standards for domestic and foreign growers and packers; (ii) identification and prioritization of risk factors; (iii) environmental hazard assessments and “possible pathways of contamination”; (iv) methods to tailor preventive controls to particular hazards and conditions affecting an operation and to the scale of the operation; (v) microbial testing; (vi) post-harvest operations; and (vii) records and other documentation that would be useful to industry and regulators in ensuring the safety of fresh produce. Comments must be submitted by May 24, 2010. See Federal Register, February 23, 2010.
The Global Organization for EPA and DHA Omega-3 Fatty Acids (GOED) has apparently sought clarification from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) about the letters sent to 11 companies that promote omega-3 fatty acid supplements as a benefit for children’s visual and mental development. According to GOED, FTC was not clear about whether it was concerned with claims on products containing short-chain omega-3 fatty acid (ALA) or long-chain omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA). The organization also questioned FTC about the types of scientific studies that would be required to substantiate the claims. FTC reportedly told GOED that “claims about an effect (e.g. brain development) need to be substantiated by science on that effect (e.g. brain development)” and that the scientific evidence in support of a claim must be based on research conducted in the age specified in the claim. “That is, if the claim is specific to toddlers two years and…
U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) has reportedly joined the California Poultry Federation (CPF) and the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) in urging the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to reform labeling requirements for sodium-enhanced chicken. “Unfortunately, since 2003, chicken injected with sodium additives has been allowed to be misleadingly labeled as ‘100 percent all-natural,’” Boxer apparently stated at a February 24, 2010, press conference. “In these difficult times, our families should not have to pay $2 billion for saltwater that they don’t know about, they don’t want and they certainly don’t need.” Known as “plumping,” this practice purportedly involves injecting “saltwater, chicken stock, seaweed extract or some combination thereof into chicken to increase its weight and price, while simultaneously increasing sodium content by up to 700 [percent],” according to one CPF member’s internet campaign. Although USDA already requires poultry containing these ingredients to carry warning labels at…
12
