Scottish Health Minister Michael Matheson has reportedly written to U.K. Health Secretary Andrew Lansley, urging him to support a ban on all TV advertising for foods high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) before the 9 p.m. watershed. According to media sources, Matheson cited OfCom studies allegedly indicating that, while children’s broadcasting adheres to strict advertising restrictions, young viewers were still seeing ads for HFSS foods during programs intended for older audiences such as talent shows. “Broadcast advertising influences the choices made by children and can shape their attitudes to food as they grow into adulthood,” Matheson was quoted as saying. “Tackling obesity and encouraging people to make healthier life choices is one of the most important things we can do to improve the health of our nation.” Although the initiative has since been lauded by groups like the National Heart Forum and British Medical Association, it has also drawn…
Category Archives Issue 432
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has issued a 66-page proposed rule that would update import rules for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). The topic was discussed in Issue 427 of this Update. Current U.S. trade rules prohibit beef imports from countries that have outbreaks or high risks of BSE, commonly known as mad cow disease. Under the proposal, APHIS would adopt criteria used by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) that identify a country’s BSE risks as negligible, controlled or undetermined. Basing its import policy for a particular country on that country’s risk classification, APHIS would also conduct its own assessment, such as when a country is not yet classified by the OIE for BSE risk and requests APHIS to conduct a risk evaluation using OIE criteria. Countries would be considered an undetermined BSE risk unless officially recognized as negligible or controlled. Calling…
The National Consumers League has written to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, asking the agency to take enforcement action against several companies that label their products as “100%” lemon juice, while they actually contain 35 percent or less lemon juice. According to the March 21, 2012, letter, “The products tested omit requisite amounts of real lemon juice and substitute water, citric acid, and in some cases sugar. The cheating is concealed by labeling the products as ‘100%’ lemon juice or simply ‘Lemon Juice from concentrate,’ and the producers make it appear that the products are of greater value than they really are.” Included with the letter are labels from four different products and lab reports from the company that apparently tested them. The National Consumers League characterizes the juice as “heavily diluted with water beyond what is necessary and appropriate to reconstitute the product.” Its letter also…
12
