A Minnesota federal court has granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss in a lawsuit alleging that Hormel Food Corp. stole trade secrets and breached contractual agreements in its joint venture to develop new methods of cooking bacon. Unitherm Food Sys. Inc. v. Hormel Food Corp., No. 14-4034 (D. Minn., order entered January 27, 2015). Unitherm alleged that it created the first viable method for pre-cooking sliced bacon—a process using spiral ovens and super-heated steam—and agreed to develop a commercially viable product with Hormel in June 2007. Unitherm asserted that Hormel disclosed its process, which Unitherm had not yet patented, to a rival company in violation of confidentiality agreements, which constituted an appropriation of trade secrets. The court disagreed, finding that Unitherm’s July 2009 patent application precluded its claim of trade secrets because patented processes cannot, by necessity, be trade secrets due to the disclosure of…
Category Archives Issue 553
A Missouri federal court has dismissed a lawsuit challenging the “all natural” labels of Cape Cod Chips because the plaintiff failed to provide a suitable definition of “natural.” Kelly v. Cape Cod Potato Chip Co., No. 14-119 (W.D. Mo., order entered January 27, 2015). The plaintiff alleged that 16 varieties of Cape Cod Chips were advertised as “all natural” and made without preservatives despite containing 13 artificial and synthetic ingredients. The court reviewed the definitions of “natural” submitted by the plaintiff and found them each lacking. It first dismissed the dictionary definition, “existing or produced by nature: not artificial,” as “not plausible because the Chips are processed foods, which of course do not exist or occur in nature.” The definition of “natural” found in an informal advisory opinion from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was not binding, the court found, because the agency “specifically declined to adopt any…
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) order that found POM Wonderful’s advertising to be misleading for claiming that its products treat or reduce the risk of several medical conditions, including prostate cancer and heart disease. POM Wonderful, LLC v. FTC, No. 13-1060 (D.C. Cir., order entered January 30, 2015). In 2013, FTC ordered POM to stop making misleading health claims about its product, and POM challenged the ruling. POM argued that its ads were protected by the First Amendment, but the court dismissed this argument, finding that deceptive and misleading ads have no First Amendment protection. The juice company also asserted that it had clinical studies to support its health claims. The circuit court affirmed FTC’s finding that POM had cherry-picked its results when presenting them to the public, which invalidated them as support for the claims. The court agreed with POM, however, that…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service, Food and Drug Administration, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are hosting a February 24, 2015, public meeting in Washington, D.C., to update stakeholders and solicit input about the agencies’ collaborative initiatives to improve foodborne illness source attribution. The discussion will target the agencies’ effort to develop a single approach to creating harmonized foodborne illness source attribution estimates from outbreak data for Salmonella, E. coli O157, Listeria, and Campylobacter. Those interested in attending the meeting should register online by February 17. See Federal Register, January 28, 2015. Issue 553
Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) and Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) this week introduced legislation (Safe Food Act of 2015) that would consolidate food safety duties currently managed by 15 different agencies to the oversight of a single food safety authority. “The fragmented nature of our food safety system has left us more vulnerable to the risk of foodborne illness, it has too often forced citizens to go it alone in the case of outbreak,” Durbin said. Among other things, the proposal would transfer responsibility for inspections, enforcement and labeling to the new Food Safety Administration. DeLauro and Durbin introduced similar legislation in 1999, 2004, 2005 and 2007. See Press Release of Rep. Rosa DeLauro and Sen. Richard Durbin, January 28, 2015. Issue 553
12
