The U.K. Supreme Court has reportedly refused to consider the appeal filed by Chobani Inc. from an appeals court order dismissing its appeal of a permanent injunction prohibiting the company from designating its U.S.-made yogurt as “Greek” yogurt. Additional details about the January 2014 appeals court ruling appear in Issue 511 of this Update. According to a court spokesperson, three justices dismissed the application for permission to appeal “because the application [did] not raise a point of law of general public importance.” Fage U.K., Ltd., which instituted the litigation, said of the ruling, “The High Court has ended the ‘Greek yogurt’ case, its decision is final. Chobani is forbidden from selling US-made strained yogurt as ‘Greek’ in the United Kingdom.” Fage also reportedly said that Chobani must pay its legal fees. Meanwhile, expressing disappointment in the outcome, Chobani has apparently indicated that it no longer sells its yogurt in Britain,…
Category Archives Issue
While a number of jurors were dismissed because a two-month trial would create hardships for them, a 12-member jury and six alternates were selected on July 31, 2014, and opening statements began the next day in the criminal prosecution of former Peanut Corp. of America (PCA) owner Stewart Parnell, his brother Michael Parnell and the company’s quality control manager Mary Wilkerson. United States v. Parnell, 13-cr-12 (M.D. Ga.). Earlier in the week, the court denied Wilkerson’s motion to dismiss or alternatively for a continuance and severance and to compel meaningful discovery. She claimed that the government’s discovery disclosures “were not accompanied by easily searchable databases” and that she was not timely provided a password to access one of two discovery disclosures. The court had apparently considered some of these issues previously and found that “Wilkerson has not demonstrated any changed circumstances that would require the Court to reconsider its referenced…
In a petition for a writ of certiorari, plaintiffs alleging harm by exposure to the flavoring agent diacetyl have argued that the Third Circuit erred in ruling that Aaroma Holdings cannot be held liable for the actions of diacetyl producer Emoral Inc., which Aaroma purchased following the alleged exposures. Diacetyl Plaintiffs v. Aaroma Holdings, No. 14-71 (U.S., petition for writ of certiorari filed July 18, 2014). The terms of the 2010 purchase agreement confirming Aaroma’s acquisition of Emoral apparently noted that Emoral may be subject to diacetyl litigation and stated that Aaroma did not assume liability for any future claims. Emoral filed for bankruptcy protection in 2011, and the bankruptcy trustee reportedly released Aaroma from future diacetyl causes of action against Emoral in exchange for $500,000. In addition to accusing the Third Circuit of diverging from binding precedent on injured creditors’ claims, the plaintiffs’ petition argues that the decision is contrary…
A California federal court has granted the plaintiffs’ request to dismiss their entire action with prejudice in a case accusing Gruma Corp. of labeling its Mission Restaurant Style tortilla chips as “all natural” despite containing genetically modified corn. Cox v. Gruma Corp., No. 12-6502 (N.D. Cal., order entered July 25, 2014). The plaintiffs’ stipulation to dismiss did not indicate whether the parties reached a settlement agreement. In the 2012 complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that Gruma violated state consumer protection laws like the Consumer Legal Remedies Act due to its alleged mislabeling; in July 2014, they debated Gruma’s motion to dismiss, in which the corporation argued that a reasonable customer would not have been misled by their labels, the complaint’s claims infringed the First Amendment, the plaintiffs failed to plead their fraud claims with the particularity required, and the court lacked jurisdiction to issue an injunction. Additional information on the case appears…
A federal court in California has dismissed for lack of standing a putative class action alleging that Pacific Foods of Oregon, Inc. misleads consumers by using the term “evaporated cane juice” (ECJ) on its food labels instead of sugar. Swearingen v. Pac. Foods of Ore., Inc., No. 13-4157 (N.D. Cal., order entered July 30, 2014). Plaintiffs Mary Swearingen and Robert Figy are named plaintiffs in a number of ECJ-related cases that have recently been stayed under the primary jurisdiction doctrine as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration considers its position on use of the term by food makers. Two such cases are summarized in Issue 529 of this Update. The court did not address this issue here, because it dismissed the case on pleading grounds. According to the court, the plaintiffs did not allege that they purchased the company’s products “in reliance on any alleged misrepresentations that evaporated cane juice is…
In consolidated actions pending since 2010, a federal court in California has entered a final order approving a class-action settlement that will require Quaker Oats Co. to remove partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs) from some of its oatmeal products and cease making the statement “contains a dietarily insignificant amount of trans fat” on any product label where the product still contains more than 0.2 grams of artificial trans fat per serving. In re Quaker Oats Labeling Litig., No. 10-0502 (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., San Jose Div., order entered July 29, 2014). Details about a court ruling trimming the plaintiffs’ claims that the company falsely advertised products with PHOs as healthy appear in Issue 433 of this Update. According to the court’s order awarding $760,000 to class counsel in attorney’s fees and costs, the suit and settlement conferred “a significant benefit . . . on the general public” given the product…
In a 9-2 en banc decision, the District of Columbia Circuit has affirmed an earlier panel decision that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) can require meat producers to include country-of-origin labeling (COOL) on their packaging. Am. Meat. Inst. v. USDA, No. 13-5281 (D.C. Cir., order entered July 29, 2014). The First Amendment allows for such required disclosures because the government’s interest is sufficient, the court found. Additional information on the American Meat Institute’s constitutional challenge and the D.C. panel’s decision appears in Issues 518 and 520 of this Update. In its discussion, the court interpreted the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, 471 U.S. 626 (1985) to reach beyond mandated commercial labeling necessary to correct deception to include the “factual and uncontroversial disclosures required to serve other government interests” at issue in the COOL context. The language in Zauderer “sweeps far more broadly than…
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has approved a modified final order in proceedings against Phusion Projects, LLC, which markets the malt beverage Four Loko, to account for the Department of Treasury’s Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau’s (TTB’s) denial of proposed changes to the company’s product labels. In re Phusion Projects, LLC, No. C-4382 (FTC, order entered July 24, 2014). Additional information about FTC’s January 2014 order and agreement with the company appears in Issue 471 of this Update. FTC alleged that Phusion and its principals “falsely claimed that a 23.5-ounce, 11 or 12 percent alcohol by volume can of Four Loko contains alcohol equivalent to one or two regular 12-ounce beers, and that a consumer could drink one can safely in its entirety on a single occasion.” The modified final order acknowledges the company’s attempt to comply with the January agreement by seeking TTB’s approval to display an…
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel Richard Griffin has reportedly determined that McDonald’s, USA, LLC will be named as a “joint employer respondent” if meritorious complaints alleging unfair labor practices against the company and its franchisees do not settle. According to the NLRB, 181 cases involving McDonald’s have been filed since November 2012. Press reports indicate that they involve claims that workers have been wrongfully fired, threatened or suspended because they have engaged in labor protests, campaigning for a $15 hourly wage and to unionize. Sixty-eight of the cases have apparently been found to have no merit, and 64 are currently under investigation. While Griffin’s advice memorandum to the NLRB’s regional offices authorizing 43 complaints brought by McDonald’s workers does not have the force of a full board ruling, it has sparked a firestorm of controversy among business interests. Noting that McDonald’s will contest the joint-employer allegation “in the…
The Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists has submitted a comment backed by more than 280 health experts asking the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to include a percent daily value for the proposed “added sugars” declaration on food and beverage labeling. Responding to the agency’s request for comments on proposed changes to the nutrition and supplement facts labels, the letter signed by Robert Lustig, Marion Nestle and members of the Healthy Food Action network urges FDA to set a maximum daily value for added sugars at 50 grams—approximately 10 percent of recommended daily calorie intake—and to list a percent daily value on the Nutrition Facts label. “Many food and beverage manufacturers add excessive amounts of sugar to their products, including those that they market as healthy options. In our current food environment, many people are unknowingly and unavoidably consuming excess sugar,” opines the…
