According to a news source, a Los Angeles Superior Court has dismissed a putative class action seeking damages against One World Enterprises LLC for allegedly misleading consumers about the nutritional value and hydrating properties of its coconut water product. Shenkman v. One World Enters. LLC, No. BC467165 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., dismissed on July 18, 2012). The court apparently agreed with the defendant that part of the plaintiff’s case involved a product representation that was simply “puffery” and stated that marketing a product’s “superior” hydrating power “is not actionable because consumers are used to hearing advertisers make general boasts and were not born yesterday.” The court dismissed the case without prejudice to give the plaintiff an opportunity to replead state-based fraud and false advertising claims about the product’s allegedly false nutritional label. According to the court, the plaintiff “correctly notes federal law will not preempt his claim if the label…
Category Archives Issue
Organizations representing the interests of Asian Americans have filed suit in a federal court in California against the governor and agency officials seeking a declaration that legislation enacted in October 2011 banning the “possession, sale, offer for sale, distribution, or trade of shark fins” violates their members’ equal protection rights, unlawfully interferes with interstate commerce and preempts federal law, and deprives them of rights, privileges and immunities under the U.S. Constitution. Chinatown Neighborhood Assn. v. Brown, No. 12-3759 (N.D. Cal., filed July 18, 2012). According to the complaint, “Shark fins are used within the Chinese American community to make the traditional dish, shark fin soup. Shark fin soup is a cultural delicacy with origins dating back to the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644 A.D.). It is a ceremonial centerpiece of traditional Chinese banquets as well as celebrations of weddings and birthdays of one’s elders. Shark fin soup serves as a traditional symbol…
Restaurant trade organizations, an Oregon restaurant and one of its employees, a server, have filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), alleging that its interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, forbidding restaurants from distributing a share of tips to non-tipped employees, regardless of whether the restaurants use the tips as a credit toward paying their employees minimum wage, conflicts with a Ninth Circuit decision and will force the restaurants to incur significant costs or subject them to litigation. Or. Restaurant & Lodging Ass’n v. Solis, No. 12-01261 (D. Or., filed July 12, 2012). According to the Ninth Circuit ruling, restaurants can require that tips be shared with back-of-house and other non-tipped restaurant employees where the wait staff are paid at least full minimum wage and the restaurants do not take a tip credit. Cumby v. Woody Woo, Inc., No. 08-35718 (9th Cir.…
A federal court in California has denied the ex parte request of foie gras producers to temporarily halt California’s enforcement of a ban on the sale of any product that is the result of force-feeding a bird for the purpose of enlarging its liver beyond normal size. Association des Éleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du Québec v. Harris, No. 12-5735 (C.D. Cal., order entered July 18, 2012). Additional information about the challenge to California’s foie gras ban appears in Issue 446 of this Update. The court also established a briefing schedule on the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction that will culminate in an August 29, 2012, hearing. Meanwhile, California restaurateurs have reportedly found ways around the state’s ban. A restaurant on a former military base in San Francisco, now owned by the National Park Service, apparently began offering the dish on its menu, claiming that its location on federal land makes it…
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has found the proposed cy pres distribution inappropriate and unacceptably vague and the attorney’s fees unreasonable in a settlement of class claims that the Kellogg Co. violated consumer protection laws by advertising its Frosted Mini-Wheats® cereal as a product that was clinically shown to improve children’s attentiveness by nearly 20 percent. Dennis v. Kellogg Co., Nos. 11-55674, -55706 (9th Cir., decided July 13, 2012). Additional information about the case appears in Issues 368 and 392 of this Update. The company’s settlement of related false-advertising charges filed by the Federal Trade Commission is discussed in Issue 301 of this Update. Under the agreement, class members could recover up to a maximum of $15, and any remaining funds would be donated to “charities chosen by the parties and approved by the Court pursuant to the cy pres doctrine.” According to the court, about $800,000 had been…
Responding to a question certified by a federal district court, a divided Montana Supreme Court has said that obesity which is not the symptom of a physiological condition may be a “physical or mental impairment” as the terms are used in the Montana Human Rights Act. BNSF Ry. Co. v. Feit, No. OP 11-0463 (Mont., decided July 6, 2012). The issue arose after an extremely obese applicant for a conductor-trainee position was told he would not be considered for the position unless he lost 10 percent of his body weight or completed certain medical examinations, including a $1,800 sleep study, at his own expense. The applicant successfully pursued an administrative remedy through the state department of labor and industry alleging that the railway defendant had illegally discriminated against him because of perceived disability. He was awarded damages for lost wages and benefits, prejudgment interest and emotional distress. On appeal, the…
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has adopted the “reasonable consumer expectation” test to determine whether a boneless turkey product allegedly containing a bone was defective. Pinkham v. Cargill, Inc., No. 11-340 (Me., decided July 3, 2012). So ruling, the court vacated the lower court’s grant of summary judgment and remanded for further proceedings. Plaintiff Stanley Pinkham allegedly consumed a hot turkey sandwich during his break. The defendant allegedly manufactured the boneless turkey product in the sandwich. In the middle of or immediately after eating the sandwich, Pinkham allegedly experienced severe and sudden pain in his upper abdominal area and thought that he might be having a heart attack. His physicians later determined that in their opinion he most likely had an “esophageal tear or perforation.” Pinkham sued, alleging that this was a result of bone in the boneless turkey. The defendant moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted while noting that Maine had…
The European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) has apparently concluded that scientific evidence supports an Article 13.5 health claim related to cocoa flavanols and normal blood flow. Submitted by chocolate manufacturer Barry Callebaut AG under Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the health claim application cited several human intervention studies that evidently showed “a cause and effect relationship” “between the consumption of cocoa flavanols and maintenance of normal endothelium-dependent vasodilation.” In particular, NDA noted that a person in the general population could obtain the claimed effect by consuming 200 milligrams of cocoa flavanols daily through either 2.5 grams (g) of high-flavanol cocoa powder or 10 g of high-flavanol dark chocolate, “both of which can be consumed in the context of a balanced diet.” The panel has thus approved the following wording as reflective of the scientific evidence: “Cocoa flavanols help maintain endothelium-dependent vasodilation, which contributes…
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has issued new guidance for the submission of food additive applications that reflects recent scientific advances as well as “the latest risk assessment principles.” Developed by EFSA’s Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Food, the new data submission guidelines aim to streamline the testing process while still generating “the data necessary to demonstrate the high level of consumer safety required.” Food companies seeking market authorization from the European Commission must provide EFSA with “the necessary information and data supporting the safety of the food additive.” In particular, the guidance introduces “a new tiered approach for the risk assessment of food additives” that will assist applicants with their toxicological testing strategy. Under the new guidance, Tier 1 tests must meet “a minimal dataset applicable to all compounds,” while Tier 2 testing “will be required for compounds which are absorbed, demonstrate toxicity or…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) has posted on its website a report from the 35th Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission that convened in Rome earlier in July 2012. In addition to adopting a number of standards on food additives, food hygiene guidelines, maximum levels of melamine for liquid infant formula, and maximum pesticide residue levels, the Commission agreed to update a scientific review of the use of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rBST) to stimulate milk production in dairy cows. Maximum residue levels have been stalled at Step 8 since 1995, and debate over the issue apparently continues. Those opposed to the use of rBST cited animal health, welfare and possible anti-microbial resistance, while the United States and others contend that these issues exceed the Codex’s scope, the science is sufficient and no food safety issues remain.
