The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a request for comments on proposed revisions to its “Guidance for Industry: Studies to Evaluate the Utility of Anti-Salmonella Chemical Food Additives in Feeds.” With the aim of helping sponsors design efficacy studies to support the submission of food additive petitions (FAPs) related to preventing Salmonella in food for animals, FDA noted that a revision is necessary because science, technology and FDA policy have changed since the guidance was last revised. Because current guidance addresses only chemical food additives intended to maintain feeds or feed ingredients as Salmonella-negative, the agency intends to expand the scope to address other categories of food additives beyond chemical food additives and to cover all food for animals, including pet food. Among other things, FDA seeks comment on the following questions: (i) what intended technical effects will the agency see in FAPs for anti-Salmonella use of…
Category Archives Legislation, Regulations and Standards
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued draft guidance for the food industry “to help growers, manufacturers and food service operators take steps to reduce levels of acrylamide in certain foods.” A chemical formed in some foods during high-temperature cooking, acrylamide has been characterized by the National Toxicology Program as “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen.” Suggesting “a range of possible approaches to acrylamide reduction,” the draft guidance stops short of identifying a specific maximum level or action level for acrylamide, but includes recommendations for potato-based foods, cereal-based foods and other products. To reduce acrylamide formation during the cooking process, the draft guidance addresses what types of raw ingredients to use; how to transport, handle, store, and process ingredients; and how to prepare both fresh and par-cooked ingredients. In particular, FDA recommends, among other things, that the food industry (i) use certain kinds of potatoes and grains,…
The mayor of Kauai County, Hawaii, has vetoed a bill that sought to restrict pesticide use by agricultural companies developing genetically modified (GM) crops on the island. The bill would have required biotechnology crop companies to disclose what pesticides they use and established no-spray zones around schools, residences, medical facilities, roads, and waterways. Although the provision that aimed to restrict the growing of GM crops was eventually removed, seed companies that operate on Kauai reportedly said that the measure would disrupt their operations. Calling the bill “legally flawed,” Kauai County Mayor Bernard Carvalho Jr. purportedly agreed with the intent of the bill but argued instead for a study of the environmental and health impacts of pesticide use on the island. “We can and will find legal means to address these important health and safety issues,” Carvalho said in a statement. Critics reportedly claim that biotech crops contribute to extensive pesticide…
Voters in Telluride, Colorado, have rejected a proposed 1-cent-per-ounce tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in a 683-313 vote. Proceeds from the tax would have reportedly funded youth health initiatives. According to a media source, “Kick the Can Telluride” was “by far the most controversial question” on the ballot, attracting outside interest from philanthropists and industry lobbying groups bankrolling campaigns for and against the ballot question. Additional details about the Telluride SSB tax campaign appear in Issue 500 of this Update. See Politico.com, November 6, 2013; WatchNewspapers.com, November 7, 2013.
California EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has issued a tentative agenda for the November 21, 2013, meeting of its Developmental and Reproductive Toxicant Identification Committee (DART IC). The committee, which determines whether a chemical has been shown to cause reproductive toxicity, will be reconsidering whether certain chemicals listed via the Labor Code mechanism as known to the state to cause reproductive toxicity should remain listed. It will also consider how to tabulate data from epidemiological studies in hazard identification documents using a matrix that includes columns for study design and sample size, outcomes of interest, exposure dosages measures, routes of exposure, and confounders, among other matters. See OEHHA News Release Update, November 7, 2013. Issue 504
Washington state voters have reportedly rejected a ballot initiative that would have required front-of-package labeling for genetically modified (GM) food products, seeds and other agricultural commodities. According to the Washington Secretary of State, 53 percent of voters ultimately opposed the initiative, which was hotly contested by consumer advocates, food companies, physicians, and farmers in the months preceding the November 5, 2013, general election. Opponents of the initiative argued that GMO labeling would not only increase household food prices by as much as $400 per year, but would expose small farmers to “shake-down, bounty hunter law suits” as well as burdensome regulations. “This is a clear victory for Washington consumers, taxpayers and family farmers across our state,” said “No on 522” campaign spokesperson Dana Bieber in a November 5 statement. “Washington voters have soundly rejected this badly written and deceptive initiative.” Meanwhile, major grocery retailers purportedly plan to continue their efforts…
The Chinese Food and Drug Administration has announced a public consultation on a revised draft of its new food safety law. Reportedly a high-priority initiative motivated by recent food safety scandals, the draft amendment includes the following major changes: (i) clarification of government duties; (ii) increased regulatory obligations for food manufacturers and distributors; (iii) enhanced controls over health foods, health products, infant formula, and imported foods; and (iv) increased penalties for non-compliance. Comments will be accepted until November 29, 2013. See U.S-China Health Products Association News Release, October 29, 2013; ChemLinked.com, November 1, 2013. Issue 504
Speaking during a North American Meat Association conference in Chicago, Canada Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz reportedly called on the United States to resolve a dispute over country-of-origin labeling (COOL) requirements for pork and beef by including provisions in the Farm Bill currently under consideration in the U.S. Congress. Ritz claimed that the rules, now before a World Trade Organization (WTO) compliance panel to decide whether provisions found in violation of WTO obligations now conform since they were revised, have cost Canada more than $1 billion annually. He also indicated that Canada has already prepared a list of retaliatory measures it will take if WTO rules in its favor. National Farmers Union President Roger Johnson reportedly bristled at the minister’s remarks, saying “Recent threats by the Canadian Agriculture Minister are unjustified and out of line. As a sovereign nation, we should not take direction from Canada. They do not dictate what…
At the behest of the European Commission, the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA Panel) has published population reference intakes (PRIs) for vitamin C and adequate intakes (AIs) for manganese “as part of its ongoing work on Dietary Reference Values (DRVs).” Basing its conclusions on the quantity of vitamin C that balances metabolic vitamin C losses in healthy adults, the scientific opinion on vitamin C proposes (i) an average requirement (AR) of 90 mg/day and a PRI of 110 mg/day for men; (ii) an AR of 80 mg/day and a PRI of 95 mg/day for women; and (iii) a PRI of 20 mg/day for infants aged 7-11 months. For children and adolescents, the NDA Panel has set PRIs ranging from 20 mg/day for children aged 1-3 years, to 100 and 90 mg/day for boys and girls aged 15-17 years. It also notes that pregnant…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Services (FSIS) has issued a final rule amending the meat and poultry products inspection regulations “to expand the circumstances in which FSIS will generically approve the labels of meat and poultry products.” Effective January 6, 2014, the final rule will also consolidate the regulations governing meat and poultry product label approvals under a new Code of Federal Regulations part. Under the new regulations, FSIS will still require establishments to submit for evaluation certain types of labeling, “e.g., labels for temporary approval, labels for products produced under religious exemption, labels for products for export with labeling deviations, and labels with claims and special statements.” In particular, FSIS will continue to review the following special statements and claims: (i) “[c]laims relating a product’s nutrient content to a health or a disease condition”; (ii) “statements that identify a product as ‘organic’ or containing organic…
