The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning letter to LSG SkyChefs, an airline catering company, to formally notify the company that its classification has been changed from “Approved” to “Provisional.” According to the December 10, 2009, letter, an FDA inspection revealed “significant deviations” from regulatory requirements, including insect infestations, standing water, debris accumulation, and swab samples that tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes. The company’s food processing facility will be re-inspected in 30 days, and if the conditions have not improved, “then your facility will be classified as ‘Use Prohibited’ or ‘Not Approved.’ ” FDA provided copies of its warning letter to the airlines that purchase food from SkyChefs; they will be unable to obtain food from the company if it fails the second inspection.
Category Archives Legislation, Regulations and Standards
In a letter recently posted to its website, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has warned Nestlé USA that its Juicy Juice® products are misbranded because their labels include “unauthorized nutrient content claims.” According to FDA, the product labels include the claim “Helps support brain development . . . In children under two years old” and also states “no sugar added.” Under FDA regulations, these statements cannot be made on products for children younger than age 2. FDA also states that other Nestlé products have misleading labels because they imply that they contain 100 percent natural fruit juice when they actually contain “Flavored juice blend from concentrate with other natural flavors & added ingredients.” In a separate letter, FDA warns that the company’s BOOST Kid Essentials Nutritionally Complete Drinks® are also misbranded because they are promoted as a “medical food” to address conditions such as “failure to thrive” and “pre/post…
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) has published a report discussing the failure of federal agencies to comply with the Congressional Review Act, which has, since 1996, required that they submit their final rules to both houses of Congress and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) before they can take effect. According to the report, CRS has identified some 1,000 final rules published in the Federal Register during seven of the past 10 years and not submitted to GAO and/or Congress. Among the “missing” rules were (i) a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) rule on national school lunch procurement requirements, (ii) a USDA rule on the Farm Service Agency’s direct farm loan programs, (iii) a USDA rule on farm program payment limitations and eligibility under the CCC program, (iv) the Environmental Protection Agency’s April 2009 rule on its “Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program,” describing the policies and procedures the agency intended to adopt…
In a development that could have a significant impact on the global food industry, the U.K.’s House of Lords has completed an inquiry into the use of nanotechnology in foods, food packaging and food contact materials. In a January 8, 2010, press release and comprehensive report accompanied by a separate volume of evidence, the Lords’ Science and Technology Committee criticizes the food industry for “not publishing or discussing details of its research in this area.” The committee calls for the government “to adequately fund research into potential health and safety risks arising from the use of nanomaterials in the food sector” and recommends that the Food Standards Agency “contribute to consumer confidence in the use of nanomaterials in food by maintaining a publicly available register of food and food packaging containing nanomaterials.” Noting the unavailability to border and port authorities of “tests to check whether imported food contains nanomaterials,” the committee…
The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) of California’s Environmental Protection Agency has proposed implementing Proposition 65 (Prop. 65) food warnings as a pilot program that will expire in 4-5 years. The proposal was presented during the agency’s last informal stakeholder meeting before final regulatory language is drafted. Under Prop. 65, warnings must be provided on products containing chemicals known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive harm. OEHHA has been considering for some time how manufacturers and retailers can provide warnings to consumers about the chemicals in foods that are on the Prop. 65 list. Comments may be submitted until January 29, 2010. The pilot program will allow the agency “to make some basic assumptions about the level of participation and coverage of the program, and then test them out over the ‘pilot’ period.” Under the proposal, manufacturers would make product-specific information available to retailers through a central…
EU ambassadors this week signed an agreement with Latin American and U.S. officials to end “a 15-year dispute over EU banana imports,” according to a December 15, 2009, press release, which described the impasse as “the longest trade dispute in history.” The European Union has apparently agreed to “gradually cut its import tariff on bananas from Latin America from €176 per tonne to €114,” in addition to providing €200 million to African and Caribbean banana-exporting countries “to help them adjust to stiffer competition from Latin America.” In return, Latin American countries will “not demand further cuts” and the United States has consented to drop its World Trade Organization (WTO) complaint against Europe’s banana importation practices. “This dispute on bananas has soured global trade relations for too long,” stated EU Agriculture and Rural Development Commissioner Mariann Fischer Boel, who noted that the accord was “well-balanced” and likely to further European objectives…
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack recently announced an agreement with dairy producers “to accelerate adoption of innovative manure-to-energy projects,” with the goal of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 25 percent by 2020. USDA has vowed to work with farmers and the Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy to develop and implement anaerobic digester technology, “a proven method of converting waste products, such as manure, into electricity.” According to USDA, only 2 percent of U.S. dairies that are candidates for a profitable digester are currently utilizing the technology, which can generate enough electricity to power 200 homes. The agency’s memorandum of understanding reportedly pledges to “increase the number of anaerobic digesters supported by USDA programs,” as well as develop “new technologies to help dairies reduce greenhouse gas emissions.” “Use of manure to electricity technology is a win for everyone because it provides an untapped source of income for…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) has published a supplemental proposed rule that would “require nutrition labeling of the major cuts of single-ingredient, raw meat and poultry products, unless an exemption applies.” FSIS proposed a similar rule in January 2001, and this notice responds to public comments already submitted and “explains how the Agency intends to proceed with a final rule.” Under the proposal, the nutrition facts label would contain information about serving size, calorie content, fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, carbohydrates, fiber, protein, and vitamins. Additional public comments are solicited and must be submitted by February 16, 2010.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) National Organic Program has reportedly closed its investigation of Target Corp. for erroneously including in newspaper advertisements organic labeling on Silk® soy milk products. The Cornucopia Institute, which charged the retailer with violating federal organic regulations, apparently made public a letter obtained from the USDA indicating that Target admitted the error and is reviewing its processes to ensure the mistake is not repeated. Further details about the institute’s complaint appear in issue 324 of this Update. The organic industry watchdog has been taking a number of initiatives to bring to the public’s attention that the company making Silk® soy milk switched this year from organic to conventional soy beans. See Star Tribune, December 14, 2009; Cornucopia News, December 2009.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), responding to a directive issued by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, has prepared a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) on genetically engineered (GE) alfalfa. The agency has preliminarily determined that granting GE alfalfa nonregulated status will have “no significant impact on the human environment.” The draft, which runs more than 1,400 pages, will be available for a 60-day public comment period once it is published in the Federal Register. The agency will conduct four public meetings on the proposed EIS; they will take place in January and February 2010 in Las Vegas, Nevada; Kearney, Nebraska; Lincoln, Nebraska; and Washington, D.C. The GE crop at issue is referred to as Roundup Ready® alfalfa, engineered to be resistant to the herbicide glyphosate. The Ninth Circuit enjoined Monsanto from selling the GE seed and farmers from planting it until APHIS…
