Netflix has reportedly requested that a Chicago bar end its theming related to the company's popular "Stranger Things" show. "The Upside Down" was intended to be a six-week installation run by neighboring Emporium Logan Square, an arcade-themed bar, but success led the creators to plan on extending the pop-up past its scheduled closing date of October 1, 2017. In a letter filled with references to the 1980s-set show featuring a group of children fighting a supernatural entity, Netflix asked the bar owners to close the temporary installation as planned. "We're not going to go full Dr. Brenner on you, but we ask that you please (1) not extend the pop-up beyond its 6 week run ending in September, and (2) reach out to us for permission if you plan to do something like this again," the letter stated. "We love our fans more than anything, but you should know that…
Category Archives Legislation, Regulations and Standards
The National Advertising Division (NAD) has ruled that Mizkan America, Inc. provided a reasonable basis for its advertising claim that “consumers prefer the taste of Ragú Homestyle Traditional over Prego Traditional.” The Campbell Soup Co., which makes Prego, challenged the ad on the grounds that Mizkan’s consumer survey methodology was flawed. Both parties conducted a taste test of the products; the Mizkan test reportedly showed a consumer preference for Ragú while the Campbell test showed no preference. The Mizkan test included testing of all tomato-based sauces, while Campbell limited its test to traditional-style sauces. NAD found the Campbell test “overly restrictive” and that its results were not “stronger or more persuasive” than those of Mizkan.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced that the produce safety rule of the Food Safety and Modernization Act of 2010 (FSMA) is now final, establishing minimum standards for the growing, harvesting, packing and holding of raw produce for human consumption. Compliance dates are staggered but will affect large operations first. The key requirements include: (i) establishment of criteria for microbial water quality based on the presence of E. coli; (ii) rules governing the use of raw manure and compost; (iii) testing and corrective-action requirements for cultivation of sprouts; (iv) rules for assessment of contamination by domestic livestock and wild animals; (v) measures for worker training, health and hygiene; and (vi) standards for equipment, tools and buildings. Qualified exemptions and variances are also included for small farms, tribes and foreign countries that export food to the United States.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced the approval of a qualified health claim that baby food with ground peanuts can reduce the development of peanut allergies. On the labels of foods suitable for infant consumption that contain ground peanuts, companies can now include the claim that "for most infants with severe eczema and/or egg allergy who are already eating solid foods, introducing foods containing ground peanuts between 4 and 10 months of age and continuing consumption may reduce the risk of developing peanut allergy by 5 years of age." "The new claim on food labels will recommend that parents check with their infant’s healthcare provider before introducing foods containing ground peanuts. It will also note that the claim is based on one study," Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said in a September 7, 2017, statement. "The FDA will continue to monitor the research related to peanut allergy. If new…
Following a Center for Food Safety lawsuit seeking information on requirements in the 2016 Federal Bioengineered Food Safety Disclosure Standards Act, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has released a study identifying potential challenges to implementation of electronic disclosure of genetically modified organism (GMO) content on food labels. The study considered whether consumers or retailers would have sufficient access to smartphones or broadband internet to easily obtain ingredient information, purportedly finding that about 85 percent of consumers experience technical challenges scanning digital links such as QR codes and less than 40 percent of small retailers provide in-store Wi-Fi access.
Implementing an executive order titled "Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs," the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has opened a comment period to identify "existing regulations and related paperwork requirements that could be modified, repealed, or replaced, consistent with the law, to achieve meaningful burden reduction while allowing us to achieve our public health mission and fulfill statutory obligations." FDA will accept comments related to "general regulatory and information collection requirements that affect multiple FDA Centers and/or Offices" and "products regulated by the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition" until December 7, 2017.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition has notified the Good Food Institute (GFI) that the agency has been unable to reach a decision on the advocacy group's March 2017 petition requesting recognition for commonly used—if technically inaccurate, per FDA definitions—food names such as "almond milk," "soymilk," "almond butter" and "cashew butter." The letter informs GFI that the agency was "not able to reach a decision on your petition within the first 180 days of its receipt, nor as of the date of this letter, because of other agency competing priorities."
A federal court has granted the U.S. Department of Commerce's motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit aiming to block implementation of the Seafood Import Monitoring Program, which will require importers to document the catch-to-table distribution chain. Alfa Int’l Seafood, Inc. v. Sullivan, No. 17-0031 (D.D.C., entered August 28, 2017). A group of seafood processing, distribution and retail companies argued that the agency violated federal law in promulgating the rule, alleging it was issued without proper authority or supporting evidence. Several environmental groups previously sought to intervene in the lawsuit to defend the rule, but the court denied their motion. The court found for the defendants on all issues, finding that Commerce's authority is broader than the plaintiffs asserted. The plaintiffs argued that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has exclusive regulatory authority over food labeling, but the court pointed to other relevant authorities that can affect labeling, including the…
Shook Partners Lindsey Heinz and Katie Gates Calderon, with Associate Hillary Nicholas, have authored an article for Law360 discussing regulations related to the use of photography during a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspection of a production facility. "Despite the void of statutory authority, the FDA continues to instruct its inspectors to 'not request permission from management to take photographs during an inspection' and to instead simply begin taking photos and video," the authors explain. "Should a company object to these tactics, inspectors are encouraged to '[a]dvise management the U.S. Courts have held that photographs may lawfully be taken as part of an inspection.' However, the two cases the FDA cites in support of this assertion — Dow Chemical Co. v. U.S. and U.S. v. Acri Wholesale Grocery Co. — do not stand for the unequivocal proposition suggested by the FDA." Heinz, Gates Calderon and Nicholas advise companies to…
Following a delay of federal rules requiring restaurants, retailers and other foodservice establishments to post calorie counts, New York City has agreed to postpone enforcement of its comparable municipal codes until May 7, 2018, matching the implementation date of the federal rules. Nat’l Assoc. of Convenience Stores v. New York City Dep’t of Hygiene, No. 17-5324 (S.D.N.Y., stipulation filed August 25, 2017). The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit July 2017 to prevent the city from enforcing a municipal regulation requiring calorie and nutrition information to be posted in their establishments. The plaintiffs stipulated that they will “encourage” their members to comply with the municipal code “to the extent those provisions impose requirements that are identical to the requirements” of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations. In addition, the parties agreed to delay arguments on the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and the city’s motion…
