The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has ordered the transfer of five cases brought by wheat farmers who allege economic injuries due to lower wheat prices, import restrictions and increased production costs after genetically engineered (GE) wheat was discovered in an Oregon farmer’s field; pretrial matters will be heard by a multidistrict litigation (MDL) court in Kansas. In re Monsanto Co. GE Wheat Litig., MDL No. 2473 (J.P.M.L., decided October 16, 2013). According to the court, the actions involve common questions of fact, and centralization in Kansas “will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. All actions share factual questions arising from Monsanto’s conduct with respect to the development and field testing of genetically-engineered [sic] ‘Roundup Ready’ wheat from 1998 through 2005, and the alleged discovery of the Roundup Ready herbicide-resistant gene in wheat plants on an Oregon…
Category Archives 10th Circuit
The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) recently heard argument on the Center for Food Safety’s motion to transfer to a multidistrict litigation (MDL) court pending lawsuits against Monsanto Co. involving the genetically modified (GM) wheat that appeared in an Oregon farmer’s conventional wheat field and briefly disrupted exports to some of the nation’s trading partners. In re Monsanto Co. Genetically Engineered Wheat Litig., MDL No. 2473 (J.P.M.L., motion argued September 26, 2013). The center requested that suits filed in Idaho, Kansas, Oregon, and Washington be transferred to the Eastern District of Washington. Additional details about the Kansas litigation appear in Issue 486 of this Update.
Brothers Eric and Ryan Jensen who own the Colorado cantaloupe farm linked to a deadly 2011 Listeria outbreak have reportedly been arrested on six misdemeanor charges of introducing adulterated food into interstate commerce and aiding and abetting. According to court records, they purportedly changed their cantaloupe cleaning process in May 2011 and never used the chlorine spray incorporated into the system. The Department of Justice (DOJ) alleges that they “were aware that their cantaloupes could be contaminated with harmful bacteria if not sufficiently washed.” The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention determined that people in 28 states consumed the contaminated cantaloupe, 33 died, 147 were hospitalized, and a pregnant women miscarried. The brothers reportedly pleaded not guilty and face a December 2, 2013, trial. If convicted, each could serve one year in prison and be fined up to $250,000 for each charge. See DOJ News Release, September 26, 2013; Fox…
A federal court in Colorado has reduced the damages awarded to a man who allegedly contracted bronchiolitis obliterans, a debilitating respiratory condition, after consuming microwave popcorn containing the butter flavoring compound diacetyl. Watson v. Dillon Cos., Inc., No. 08-91 (D. Colo., judgment entered September 5, 2013). The jury awarded the plaintiff and his wife more than $7 million, including punitive damages, apportioned among a number of defendants, and the court reduced the total award by more than half to $3.04 million with interest. Additional information about the lawsuit appears in Issues 244, 454 and 480 of this Update. The court agreed with defendant Gilster-Mary Lee, a private label food manufacturer, that a statutory cap applied to the $800,000 non economic damages award against it because the plaintiff discovered or should have discovered his lung injury and its cause before a statutory cut-off in January 2008. The court further refused to…
A federal magistrate has recommended that General Mills’ motion to dismiss a putative consumer fraud class action be denied without prejudice and that, under the primary jurisdiction doctrine, the suit be stayed “pending action by the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] with respect to the referral made by Judge Rogers in Cox v. Gruma. Van Atta v. General Mills, Inc., No. 12-2815 (D. Colo., recommendation entered July 18, 2013). At issue is the company’s claim that its granola bars are “100% Natural” when they allegedly contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Finding that the food-labeling issue falls within FDA’s regulatory authority and that the agency “has not issued a rule which requires products containing GMOs to be labeled as such, nor has the FDA issued a rule regarding whether products labeled ‘natural’ may contain GMOs,” the magistrate found invocation of the primary jurisdiction doctrine appropriate. In this regard, the magistrate stated,…
A divided Colorado Supreme Court has determined that a trial court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to grant the motion for pro hac vice admission filed by Seattle-based law firm Marler Clark to represent a plaintiff in a foodborne illness lawsuit. In re Liebnow v. Boston Enters. Inc., No. 12SA83 (Colo., decided February 4, 2013). Counsel for the defendant had apparently consulted with Drew Falkenstein, a member of the Marler Clark firm, before plaintiff’s counsel asked another member of the firm to step in and represent the plaintiff. Defense counsel and Falkenstein “talked about defense counsel’s planned theory of the case,” advice on a trial expert and Falkenstein’s recommendation that a lettuce distributor be added as a nonparty defendant after he had researched E. coli outbreaks using Marler Clark’s publicly accessible database and finding such an outbreak at another local restaurant chain. “[T]he trial court concluded that…
A federal court in New Mexico has approved a consent decree of permanent injunction between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Sunland, Inc., which owns a facility where peanut butter products purportedly tainted with Salmonella were produced. United States v. Sunland, Inc., No. 12-1312 (D.N.M., filed December 21, 2012). The outbreak affected “at least 35 people from 19 states,” eight of whom “were hospitalized as a result of their infection.” While the company neither admits nor denies FDA’s allegations, it agreed to take a number of actions to correct food-handling practices “that likely resulted in cross-contamination between raw peanuts and peanuts that had been roasted or brined.” The company must “develop and implement sanitation control programs; provide FDA the opportunity to inspect the facilities to assure Sunland’s compliance with the consent decree, the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and applicable regulations; and receive written authorization from FDA to resume…
A Colorado resident has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a putative nationwide class against Pepperidge Farm, Inc., alleging that the company misleads consumers by labeling its Cheddar Goldfish crackers “natural,” because they contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs) “in the form of soy and/or soy derivatives.” Bolerjack v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., No. 12-2918 (D. Colo., filed November 6, 2012). Claiming damages in excess of $5 million, the plaintiff claims that she “purchased the Product believing it to be ‘Natural’ because he [sic] read and relied on Pepperidge Farm’s material statement that the Product is ‘Natural,’ prominently displayed on the Product’s front labeling/packaging. Plaintiff has been damaged by her purchase of the Product because the labeling and advertising for the Product was and is false and/or misleading under Colorado law; therefore, the Product is worth less than what Plaintiff paid for it and/ or Plaintiff did not receive what he [sic]…
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has filed another infringement action against a retailer allegedly selling a chicken sandwich combo using the CHIPOTLE® trademark. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. v. Jack in the Box, Inc., No. 12-02511 (D. Colo., filed September 21, 2012). Information about the trademark infringement lawsuit Chipotle filed in April against Kroger Co. appears in Issue 435 of this Update. In the new action against Jack in the Box, Chipotle alleges that when asked to cease using the CHIPOTLE® marks to promote its chicken sandwich, the defendant responded that its use of the word did not infringe the marks and that it did not currently plan to use the mark, which was used in connection with a limited time offer, in the future. Still, according to the complaint, the defendant “suggested that it would use the CHIPOTLE Marks in the future.” Claiming that its marks have “acquired substantial goodwill and are…
A federal jury has reportedly awarded $7.2 million to a man who claimed that he developed bronchiolitis obliterans, a debilitating lung disease also known as popcorn lung, from consuming two to three bags of microwave popcorn every day for six years. Watson v. Dillon Cos., Inc., No. 08-91 (D. Colo., decided September 19, 2012). Details about the case appear in issue 244 of this Update. The settlement that the plaintiff reached with one of the defendants, a flavoring manufacturer, is discussed in Issue 331 of this Update. According to a news source, the jury found that Gilster-Mary Lee Corp., which manufactured the popcorn, and a retailer were negligent for failing to warn that diacetyl, the butter flavoring chemical in the product, was dangerous. The manufacturer was found liable for 80 percent of the damages, and the supermarket chain was found liable for 20 percent. The retailer has indicated that it…
