The Ninth Circuit has denied the Council for Education and Research on Toxics' petition for an en banc reconsideration of a March 2022 decision upholding a preliminary injunction on enforcing mandated warnings on products containing acrylamide under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Prop. 65). Cal. Chamber of Com. v. Council for Education and Research on Toxics, No. 21-15745 (9th Cir., entered October 26, 2022). The order denying the rehearing is brief, but one circuit judge issued a statement respecting the denial but asserting that the court should have granted the petition for rehearing. "The right to access the courts is one of 'the most precious of the liberties safeguarded by the Bill of Rights.' [] But in this opinion, without basis in law or precedent, this Court narrows that fundamental right. The panel opinion closes the courtroom doors to all those seeking to enforce provisions…
Category Archives 9th Circuit
A federal court in California has largely granted Mead Johnson & Company’s bid to throw out a proposed class action alleging the company misled consumers about just how much milk was in its Enfamil baby formulas. Martinez v. Mead Johnson & Co., LLC, No. 22-0213 (C.D. Cal., entered October 22, 2022). The court granted the company’s motion to dismiss on all but one of the plaintiff’s claims, her claim for unjust enrichment and restitution, and allowed the plaintiff to file an amended complaint. The plaintiff alleged in her February 2022 complaint that Mead Johnson engaged in misleading advertising by calling its Enfamil powdered infant products “Milk-based” when milk is one of the ingredients, not the primary ingredient by weight. The plaintiff alleged that at the time of purchase, she understood that phrasing to mean milk was the primary ingredient, but later learned the primary ingredient in the product was corn syrup…
A California consumer has filed a proposed class action against La Fermiere, alleging the yogurt maker misrepresented the origin of its products on its packaging. Manier v. La Fermiere Inc., No. 22-1894 (C.D. Cal., filed October 27, 2022). The plaintiff alleged she was misled by the product’s packaging into believing the yogurt she bought was made in France, and she would not have purchased the company’s yogurt had she been aware of the misrepresentations. According to the complaint, the defendant runs U.S. operations for a French-based company that manufactures, labels, distributes and sells yogurt in France and throughout Europe. It also manufactures, labels, distributes and sells yogurt products in the United States. "Defendant’s marketing, labeling and sale of the Products misleads a reasonable consumer to believe that the yogurts are made in France, by using the words 'Naturally French' on the front label," she asserted in the complaint. "Consumers interpret that…
A federal court has denied a bid by Pilgrim’s Pride to throw out claims it misrepresented chicken it packaged and sold as “boneless” that wound up in recalled Trader Joe’s Chili Lime Chicken Burgers for having excessive amounts of bone. Innovative Solutions Int'l Inc. v. Houlihan Trading Co., Inc., No. 22-296 (W.D. Wash., entered October 18, 2022). The suit stems from the plaintiff’s 2021 purchase of approximately 240,000 pounds of chicken product from the Houlihan Trading Company. Pilgrim’s Pride, also a defendant, was the original producer, processor and packager of the chicken, according to the order. The chicken was labeled and included supporting documentation that it was “boneless” by industry standards. The plaintiff used the chicken to make and sell Trader Joe’s Chili Lime Chicken Burgers and sold the burgers to Trader’s Joe’s. After the grocery chain began to receive reports of bones in the burgers in September 2021, it stopped…
A federal court has dismissed a putative class action against baby and toddler-food manufacturer Sprout Foods Inc. after finding the plaintiffs failed to bring plausible claims that the company’s product labeling is misleading. Davidson v. Sprout Foods Inc., No. 22-1050 (N.D. Cal., entered October 21, 2022). The plaintiffs, a California couple, alleged the company’s product packaging contained statements about nutrition content, such as “3g of Protein, 4g of Fiber and 300mg Omega-3 from Chia ALA,” that constitute “nutrient content claims” in violation of U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations. They alleged that Sprout violated the California False Advertising Act, the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act and the California Unfair Competition Law (UCL). They also brought claims of common-law fraud and unjust enrichment. In reviewing the plaintiffs’ fraud claims, the court found that the plaintiffs claim to make two showings: that the labels communicate a message that the products provide physical…
A California federal court has denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit alleging Barilla America Inc. misled consumers as to the source of its pasta products by marketing them as "Italy's #1 Brand of Pasta." Sinatro v. Barilla Am. Inc., No. 22-3460 (N.D. Cal., entered October 17, 2022). The court first held that the plaintiffs had standing to sue because the "allegations are sufficient to establish an economic injury for purposes of constitutional standing," but it found that the plaintiff lacked standing for injunctive relief. Turning to whether a reasonable consumer could be misled by Barilla's claims, the court was unpersuaded by Barilla's argument that "it is not misleading to invoke the company’s Italian roots 'through generalized representations of the brand as a whole.'” "Barilla asks the court to assume that consumers would solely perceive the Challenged Representation to mean that the products at issue are part of the Barilla brand,…
A California man has sued the maker of Texas Pete-brand hot sauce products, alleging the company deceptively advertises itself as having Texas ties, while it is in fact made in North Carolina. White v. T.W. Garner Food Co., No 22-6503 (C.D. Cal., filed September 12, 2022). The plaintiff has brought a proposed class action against T.W. Garner Food Co., a North Carolina company, alleging the company’s labeling and advertising campaign “is overloaded with references to Texas.” “Although Defendant brands the Products ‘Texas Pete,’ there is surprisingly nothing Texas about them: unknown to consumers, the Products are standard Louisiana-style hot sauces, made with ingredients sourced outside the state of Texas, at a factory in North Carolina,” the complaint said. The plaintiffs noted that the packaging and labeling has “distinctly Texan imagery: the famed white ‘lone’ star from the Texan flag together with a ‘lassoing’ cowboy.” “Defendant concocted this false marketing and…
A federal appeals court has ruled that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is not clearly required by federal law to issue a regulation barring hydroponic growers from labeling their goods as organic. Ctr. for Food Safety v. Vilsack, No. 21-15883 (9th Cir., entered September 22, 2022). A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit unanimously held in an unsigned, unpublished opinion that the Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA) of 1990 does not clearly bar hydroponic production. The ruling comes in an appeal brought by consumer and organic farming industry groups in their suit against USDA filed in 2020 after the agency rejected their 2019 petition to issue regulations prohibiting organic certification of hydroponic agricultural production. They argued that hydroponic operations fail to satisfy the tenets of organic farming and do not meet the statutory and regulatory requirements of OFPA. The district court disagreed, granting the…
A federal court in California has ruled that solely using QR codes on food packaging is not enough to disclose a product’s bioengineered status to consumers. Natural Grocers v. Vilsack, No. 20-5151 (N.D. Cal., entered September 13, 2022). The ruling was in a suit brought by retailers and non-profit organizations against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The plaintiffs challenged a USDA regulation that took effect in January that required food manufacturers to disclose, on product packaging, bioengineered foods and foods made with bioengineered ingredients. The rule required all such products to include either a text, symbol or electronic or digital link to disclosure information. USDA also allowed food manufacturers to pair a text message hotline with a QR code on product packaging so that consumers could text the number or scan the code to receive the product’s disclosure information. The court determined that USDA’s decision to allow for electronic…
A federal court has dismissed a proposed class action claiming Kellogg misled consumers into believing their "veggie" MorningStar Farms products were exclusively or mostly made with vegetables. Kennard v. Kellogg Sales Co., No. 21-7211 (N.D. Cal., entered September 14, 2022). The plaintiff in the suit alleged Kellogg misleadingly and illegally labels MorningStar Farms "veggie" products, in violation of California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California's false advertising law and California's unfair competition law. She contended that reasonable consumers understand the term "veggie" to mean that products are made primarily of vegetables and alleged Kellogg's use of the term "veggie" is false or misleading because the ingredients are not primarily vegetables. The court disagreed, finding the allegations "are implausible and do not support a reasonable inference that some significant portion of consumers would be misled into thinking the VEGGIE products are made primarily of vegetables as opposed to being vegetarian meat substitutes…
