A California woman has filed a proposed class action claiming that Gerber Products Co. made improper nutrient claims on its labeling of baby and toddler food products. Howard v. Gerber Products Company, No. 22-4779 (N.D. Cal., filed August 19, 2022). The plaintiff alleges that Gerber makes nutrient content claims on product packaging that are prohibited by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Moreover, the nutrient content claims on Defendant’s products mislead purchasers into believing that the products provide physical health benefits for children under two years of age in order to induce parents into purchasing Defendant’s products,” the plaintiff asserts in the complaint. “In fact, the Products are harmful both nutritionally and developmentally for children under two.” The plaintiff highlighted the use of labeling indicating protein content of products, as well as the use of the words “nutritious” and “wonderfoods,” and asserts that some of Gerber’s products contain high amounts…
Category Archives 9th Circuit
A group of California consumers and an animal welfare nonprofit have filed a putative class action against Whole Foods, alleging the grocer misled consumers about whether its beef products were truly antibiotic-free. Safari v. Whole Foods Market, Inc., No. 22-01562 (C.D. Cal., filed Aug. 23, 2022). The plaintiffs alleged that Whole Foods’ “No Antibiotics, Ever” slogan and marketing used to tout its beef products as antibiotic-free misrepresented what consumers were actually getting in their beef purchases. “The reality is starkly different: Whole Foods sold Beef Products without taking effective measures to ensure that they came from cattle raised without antibiotics,” the plaintiffs asserted, pointing to independent testing which they say shows evidence of antibiotic residue in Whole Foods’ beef products. The plaintiffs noted in the complaint that consumer demand has risen in recent years for antibiotic-free meat. Consumers are also increasingly willing to pay a premium for it, the plaintiffs asserted,…
Two consumers have filed a putative class action alleging that Barilla America Inc. markets its pasta to incorrectly imply that the products are made in Italy. Sinatro v. Barilla Am. Inc., No. 22-3460 (N.D. Cal., filed June 11, 2022). The complaint asserts that consumers seek "authentic Italian-made pastas" because they "hold a certain prestige and [are] generally viewed as a higher quality product." The plaintiffs argue that Barilla's statement "Italy's #1 Brand of Pasta," which appears prominently on its product packaging, leads consumers to believe that the products are made in Italy rather than New York and Iowa. Further, the company's website describes it as "an Italian family-owned food company" and emphasizes that "Italians know the familiar Blue Box means quality, perfectly al dente pastas every time. That's why Barilla has been an Italian favorite for over 140 years, and continues to be the #1 pasta in Italy today." For alleged…
Clif Bar & Co. has submitted a settlement agreement to a California federal court seeking approval to settle a class action alleging that Clif Bars are misleadingly marketed as healthy despite containing levels of sugar beyond what consumers would expect healthy foods to contain. Milan v. Clif Bar & Co., No. 18-2354 (N.D. Cal., filed June 23, 2022). In addition to establishing a $10.5-million fund, Clif will "make significant changes to the labeling and packaging of its original Clif Bars and Kid ZBars," according to the agreement. The changes include refraining from use of "nutrition," "nutritious" and "nourishing kids in motion" on Clif Bar packaging "so long as 10% or more of [a bar's] calories come from added sugars." The class includes customers who purchased Clif Bars between April 19, 2014, and June 23, 2022, and claimants will be divided into quintiles with varying levels of awards depending on degrees of…
Beyond Meat Inc., producer of plant-based meat substitute products, has been hit with two lawsuits in the same week—one filed by a competitor and another filed by a group of consumers. Roberts v. Beyond Meat Inc., No. 22-2861 (N.D. Ill., E. Div., filed May 31, 2022); Don Lee Farms v. Beyond Meat Inc., No. 22-3751 (C.D. Cal., filed June 2, 2022). The complaints make similar allegations, asserting that Beyond Meat "miscalculates and overstates the Products' protein content" as well as the quality of the protein. "Beyond Meat goes the extra mile to represent that the Products are the 'future of protein' and claims that eating the Products allows consumers to get high-quality protein in their diet while simultaneously helping the environment," the consumer complaint argues. Both complaints describe the process of testing Beyond Meat's products to ascertain the protein content of the products, allegedly finding that most of the products contained…
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has found that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction blocking a requirement to warn California consumers about the presence of acrylamide in food and beverage products. Cal. Chamber of Com. v. Council for Education and Research on Toxics, No. 19-2019 (9th Cir., entered March 17, 2022). Filed by the California Chamber of Commerce, the suit alleges that requiring the warning for products containing chemicals listed under the state's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Prop. 65) on products with acrylamide would violate the organization's members' "First Amendment rights to not be compelled to place false and misleading acrylamide warnings on their food products." The district court held that the state did not show the Prop. 65 acrylamide warning was "purely factual and uncontroversial." "[D]ozens of epidemiological studies have failed to tie human cancer to…
A plaintiff has filed a putative class action alleging that Mead Johnson & Co. markets its Enfamil infant formula products as "milk-based" despite containing corn-syrup solids as the primary ingredient. Martinez v. Mead Johnson & Co. LLC, No. 22-0213 (C.D. Cal., E. Div., filed February 2, 2022). The front-label packaging indicates that the product is a "milk-based powder," the complaint asserts, but "corn syrup solids" is listed as first on the ingredient list on the back of the packaging. The plaintiff argues that added sugars are banned in infant formulas sold in Europe in favor of carbohydrates that come from lactose. "[C]onsumers are being deceived into believing they are receiving a milk-based, healthier formula for their infant when, in reality, they are feeding their baby a product where the primary ingredient is unhealthy corn syrup." The plaintiff seeks damages, restitution, class certification, injunctive relief and attorney's fees for alleged violations of…
Two plaintiffs have alleged that McCormick & Co. Inc. sells herbs and spices that "expose consumers to heightened levels of toxic heavy metals, including lead, arsenic, and cadmium," without providing warnings. Balistreri v. McCormick & Co. Inc., No. 22-0349 (N.D. Cal., filed January 18, 2022). The complaint cites a Consumer Reports article, "Your Herbs and Spices Might Contain Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead," that purports to have found "sufficient levels of toxic metals as to render them unsafe for human consumption." "As a result of Defendant’s respective representations regarding the safety of their herbs and spices, and Defendant’s concealment of the fact that its herbs and spices contained elevated levels of toxic heavy metals, Plaintiffs and the Class members reasonably believed that Defendant’s Products were free from substances that would negatively affect children’s development as well as their own health," the complaint asserts. The plaintiffs seek to represent a class of consumers alleging violations…
A plaintiff has filed a putative class action alleging that Kellogg Sales Co. misleads consumers as to the quantity of vegetables in its MorningStar "Veggie" products, including "Veggie Burgers," "Veggie Dogs," "Veggitizers" and "Veggie Chik'n." Kennard v. Kellogg Sales Co., No. 21-7211 (N.D. Cal., filed September 17, 2021). Kellogg represents its products as "Veggie," the complaint asserts, "but this representation is false or at least highly misleading because the predominant non-water ingredient in all of the Veggie Products is not vegetables—or even vegetable-based—but instead, grain or oil." The consumer also argues that the "Veggie" products violate California law "by using product names that include the term 'VEGGIE' while failing to disclose the percentage of vegetables in the products, which have a material bearing on the price and consumer acceptance of the Veggie Products." The plaintiff alleges violations of California consumer-protection statutes as well as breach of warranties and seeks class…
A consumer has alleged that The Kroger Co. misleads with its packaging for sparkling water products sold with flavors such as "Black Cherry," "White Grape" and "Kiwi Strawberry" because the waters are purportedly flavored artificially rather than with extracts of the fruits. Gammino v. Kroger Co., No. 21-2933 (N.D. Cal., filed April 22, 2021). The complaint asserts that Kroger's "packaging, labeling, and advertising scheme for these Products is intended to give consumers the impression that they are buying a premium, all-natural product instead of a product that is artificially flavored." The plaintiff asserts that the flavoring in the beverages comes from malic acid, "a synthetic chemical manufactured in a petrochemical factory from petroleum feedstocks." The complaint lists several causes of action, including alleged violations of Ohio and California's consumer-protection statutes as well as fraud by omission, negligent misrepresentation and money had and received.
