Category Archives 9th Circuit

According to a news source, Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad (R) and the attorneys general (AGs) of Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Alabama, and Kentucky have filed a notice that they will appeal a district court dismissal of their challenge to a California law that allegedly forces egg producers in other states to comply with a voter-approved ballot measure that bans the sale of eggs which have been produced by hens in conventional cages. Missouri ex rel. Koster v. Harris, No. 14-17111 (9th Cir., notice of appeal filed October 24, 2014). Information about a related complaint appears in Issue 512 of this Update. The district court apparently dismissed the complaint in early October on the ground that the officials lack standing to bring the lawsuit because California’s law affects only a subset of farmers who plan not to comply with it. Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster claims that the state’s farmers, who export some…

A California resident has filed a putative nationwide class action in federal court against Olé Mexican Foods, Inc., alleging that its Xtreme Wellness® whole-wheat tortillas contain partially hydrogenated vegetable oil, “banned in many parts of the world due to its artificial trans fat content,” thus belying the health and wellness representations the company uses on product labels. Guttmann v. Olé Mexican Foods, Inc., No. 14-4845 (N.D. Cal., filed October 31, 2014). The plaintiff alleges that artificial trans fat causes cardiovascular disease; Type 2 diabetes; breast, prostate and colorectal cancer; Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive decline; and damage to vital organs. He claims that he purchased one package each month for two years at a higher price than comparable products relying on package labeling stating “Healthy Life Style,” “Better Choice for Your Health,” “Whole Wheat,” and “High Source of Fiber and Protein.” According to the complaint, because the product contains trans fat, small amounts…

The Center for Food Safety and two other public interest organizations have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seeking to overturn its approval of 11 animal drugs containing ractopamine hydrochloride on the ground that the agency failed to undertake the analysis purportedly required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) before approving them. Ctr. for Food Safety v. Hamburg, No. 14-4932 (N.D. Cal., filed November 6, 2014). The Center previously petitioned FDA to reduce the allowable levels of ractopamine, administered in animal feeds to boost growth and leanness in meat production, and to study its potential effects on human health and animal welfare. Information about the petition appears in Issue 466 of this Update. The complaint sets forth the effects these drugs allegedly have on livestock, like pigs, and on the environment. The plaintiffs claim that the company that makes ractopamine has acknowledged the “risk…

Days after the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a lawsuit to enjoin Gerber Products Co. from claiming that its Good Start® Gentle infant formula helps reduce allergies in children, a consumer filed a putative class action in Arizona federal court alleging the same facts. Werthe v. Gerber Prods. Co., No. 14-8216 (D. Ariz., filed November 3, 2014). Additional information about FTC’s lawsuit against Gerber appears in Issue 543 of this Update. Like the FTC complaint, the consumer action alleges that Gerber advertises the partially hydrolyzed whey protein (PHWP) in its Good Start® Gentle formula as reducing the risk of atopic dermatitis in infants. As a result, Gerbercharges “a significant premium” over other infant formulas, the plaintiff asserts. The complaint cites Gerber’s labeling, which allegedly promises thatits product is the “1st & Only Routine Formula to Reduce the Risk of Developing Allergies” and that it “Meets FDA [U.S. Food and Drug…

A California federal court has granted a motion for reconsideration in a case alleging that Wallaby Yogurt Co. includes “evaporated cane juice” (ECJ) on its ingredient lists rather than what plaintiffs allege is the more common name, sugar. Morgan v. Wallaby Yogurt Co., No. 13-296 (N.D. Cal, order entered November 5, 2014). Wallaby had moved for reconsideration of prior orders allowing the case to proceed. The text-only docket indicates that the motion for reconsideration has been granted and the case stayed, with a written order to follow. The stay follows a series of similar actions in other cases after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced in March 2014 that it would reconsider its 2009 draft guidance discouraging use of the term. In two similar putative class actions, courts have extended stays originally imposed in May 2014 because FDA has not yet issued further guidance. Figy v. Lifeway Foods, No.…

A federal court in California has decertified a damages class in litigation alleging that Dole Packaged Foods, LLC misleads consumers by labeling 10 of its fruit products as “All Natural Fruit” because they contain allegedly synthetic ingredients ascorbic acid and citric acid. Brazil v. Dole Packaged Foods, LLC, No. 12-1831 (N.D. Cal., order entered November 6, 2014). The court found flaws in the regression model that the plaintiff’s expert (Oral Capps) used to determine the price premium attributable to the company’s use of the “All Natural Fruit” label statements, finding that the model “does not sufficiently isolate the price impact” of the labeling statement. The court disagreed with Dole that the expert performed a “price” regression rather than a “sales” regression and thus “measured the wrong thing.” According to the court, while the initially proposed analysis differed from the one actually carried out, given that the expert had initially proposed…

Diamond Foods, Inc. has agreed to settle the consumer fraud class action suits filed by plaintiffs in California and Florida alleging that the company falsely labels its Kettle Brand® chip products as “All Natural,” when they contain artificial, synthetic or genetically modified ingredients, or as “Reduced Fat” while referencing non-comparable foods. Klacko v. Diamond Foods, Inc., No. 14-80005 (S.D. Fla., motion for preliminary approval filed October 22, 2014). Details about one of two similar California lawsuits appear in Issue 510 of this Update. Under the agreement, the company would establish a $2.75-million fund for class member claims, pay the costs of class notice and administration up to $300,000 and agree not to oppose attorney’s fees, expenses and costs of $775,000. Class members with proof of purchase would be able to recover up to $20, representing $1.00 for up to 20 purchases; those without proof of purchase would recover up to $10.…

A California federal court has rejected in part and granted in part Total Sweeteners Inc.’s motion for summary judgment in a case alleging that the molasses supplier sold American Licorice Co. shipments tainted with lead that American Licorice then used to create Red Vines black licorice candy, resulting in a costly recall. Am. Licorice Co. v. Total Sweeteners Inc., No. 13-1929 (N.D. Cal., order entered October 22, 2014). Additional details about the case appear in Issue 494 of this Update. American Licorice argued that, under the sales contract, Total Sweeteners was obliged to provide molasses that complied with state and federal regulations; Total Sweeteners asserted that American Licorice knew that molasses has some naturally occurring lead and should have tested for it upon receipt. The court focused on the contract, agreeing with Total Sweeteners that the sales contract between the parties, and not a subsequent purchase order with terms favorable…

An Arizona federal court has preliminarily approved a settlement in a lawsuit alleging that Bashas’ Inc. paid Hispanic workers less than comparable non-Hispanic workers from 1998 to 2007 in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Parra v. Bashas’ Inc., No. 2-591 (D. Ariz., order entered October 21, 2014). The plaintiffs were employees at Bashas’ Inc.’s Food City stores, which cater mostly to Hispanic customers and whose staff was about 75 percent Hispanic. They alleged that they were paid on a lower pay scale than the mostly white employees at Bashas’ Inc.’s A.J. Fine Foods and Bashas’ stores. According to the plaintiffs, Bashas’ Inc.’s president personally set the pay scale each year, and an experienced Food City store clerk was allegedly paid $0.82 per hour less than a comparable Bashas’ store clerk in 1999—amounting to a loss of about $1,640 per year for a full-time employee. Under…

A California federal court has granted in part and denied in part a motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit alleging that Mott’s violated the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) and California’s Sherman Law standards on the use of “no sugar added” on food packaging. Rahman v. Mott’s LLP, No. 13-3482 (N.D. Cal., order entered October 14, 2014). The plaintiff alleged that Mott’s 100% Apple Juice included a “no sugar added” label but failed to follow the additional FDA regulations requiring “a statement that the food is not ‘low calorie’ or ‘calorie reduced’ (unless the food meets the requirement for a ‘low’ or ‘reduced calorie’ food) and that directs consumers’ attention to the nutrition panel for further information on sugar and calorie content.” Mott’s moved for summary judgment on four grounds: the plaintiff (i) did not suffer damages as a result of purchasing the apple juice, (ii) lacked standing…

Close