A California federal court has preliminarily approved a settlement in a case alleging that Ghirardelli failed to include white chocolate, cocoa or cocoa butter in its white chocolate chips. Miller v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Co., No. 12-4936 (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., San Francisco Div., order entered October 2, 2014). Additional details about the settlement appear in Issue 535 of this Update, and further information about the litigation appears in Issues 465 and 479 of this Update. Under the agreement, Ghirardelli will pay $5.25 million to a common fund to distribute to class members. Notices to potential class members will appear in People magazine and the Oakland Tribune and on several popular websites, and any leftover balance in the settlement fund will be divided among several consumer and food organizations, including Consumers Union and Florida State University’s Food & Nutrition Science Department. A fairness hearing is scheduled for February 2015. …
Category Archives 9th Circuit
A California federal court has granted Duke University’s motion to dismiss in a lawsuit filed by John Wayne Enterprises seeking a declaratory judgment that its registration and use of Duke trademarks are not likely to cause consumer confusion and do not violate or dilute the school’s trademarks. John Wayne Enterprises, LLC v. Duke Univ., No. 14-1020 (C.D. Cal., order entered September 30, 2014). The case was dismissed on procedural grounds after the court found that it did not have jurisdiction over the North Carolina-based university. Additional information about the lawsuit appears in Issue 530 of this Update. Issue 539
A California federal court has certified a statewide liability class in a lawsuit accusing Jamba Juice of labeling its home smoothie kits as “all natural” despite containing five synthetic ingredients—ascorbic acid, xanthan gum, steviol glycosides, modified corn starch, and gelatin—but it refused to certify the class for damages. Lilly v. Jamba Juice Co., No. 13-2998 (N.D. Cal., order entered September 18, 2014). The court dismissed Jamba Juice’s argument that the class was unascertainable because no purchase records existed for the kits, finding that such an approach would “have significant negative ramifications for the ability to obtain redress for consumer injuries.” The court agreed, however, with Jamba Juice’s proposition that the plaintiffs could not provide a plausible class-wide damages model, because they did not show “any evidence, expert reports, or even detailed explanation about how those damages models can be fairly determined or at least estimated.” See Bloomberg BNA, September 19, 2014.…
A California federal court has approved a settlement in a case accusing Guayaki Sustainable Rainforest Products Inc. of misleading its customers by listing “organic evaporated cane juice” (ECJ) as an ingredient of its yerba mate products. Cowan v. Guayaki Sustainable Rainforest Prods. Inc., No. 14-1248 (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., order entered September 16, 2014). The terms of the settlement agreement are confidential. The plaintiff’s suit was part of a deluge of putative class actions alleging product mislabeling because the companies included ECJ on their ingredient lists rather than, plaintiffs have argued, the more common and accepted term for the substance, sugar. Many of these cases have been dismissed without prejudice or stayed while courts and parties await promised guidance on the issue from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Additional information on recent cases appears in Issues 534, 532 and 530 of this Update. Issue 538
A federal court in Idaho has denied, in part, the motion to dismiss filed by state officials in a challenge filed by animal-rights activists and other groups to a law that criminalizes the undercover investigations of agricultural operations. Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Otter, No. 14-0104 (D. Idaho, order entered September 4, 2014). The court agreed to dismiss the governor who lacked enforcement authority under the law and emphasized that its rulings did not address the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims of First Amendment and Equal Protection violations, as well as preemption under three federal laws that protect whistleblowers. According to the court, the law was enacted after Mercy for Animals Dairy released a video of workers abusing cows at an Idaho dairy. The footage had been obtained by an undercover investigator who misrepresented his identity to gain access to the facility and made the audiovisual recordings without the dairy owner’s knowledge…
Former Rancho Feeding Operations co-owner Robert Singleton has agreed to plead guilty to one count of aiding and abetting the distribution of condemned and diseased cattle in violation of the Federal Meat Inspection Act and will testify against the other owner of the now-defunct slaughterhouse operation and its employees. United States v. Singleton, No. 14-cr-441 (N.D. Cal., entered August 22, 2014). Additional details about the criminal allegations appear in Issue 535 of this Update. As part of the agreement, Singleton, who is 77, will cooperate with the U.S. attorney’s office, surrender any assets acquired as a result of the alleged illegal conduct, and permanently cease and desist from owning, operating or managing a meat-processing facility or slaughterhouse. The agreement contains admissions as to all of the conduct alleged in the information filed against Singleton, including instructing employees to swap the heads of healthy cattle for those of diseased cattle before…
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has denied a request for interlocutory review of a class certification ruling in an action alleging that Blue Diamond Growers’ almond milk is mislabeled as “All Natural” and the company hides its added sugar content by listing “evaporated cane juice” (ECJ) on its label instead. Blue Diamond Growers v. Werdebaugh, No. 14-80084 (9th Cir., order entered August 22, 2014). Additional details about the suit appear in Issue 525 of this Update. Blue Diamond challenged the district court’s ruling that the class was ascertainable, arguing that the decision “exacerbates a split of authority amongst district courts in this Circuit over the threshold showing that putative class representatives must make to demonstrate an ascertainable class in food mislabeling cases. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals—the only circuit to squarely resolve the issue—holds that sales records or other reliable evidence of product purchases must be available for a…
The parties to a putative class action against Merisant Co. and Whole Earth Sweetener Co. have agreed on settlement terms, including changes to the Pure Via sweetener’s website and packaging, class certification and a $1.65- million payment to a settlement fund. Aguiar v. Merisant Co., No. 14-670 (C.D. Cal., motion filed August 18, 2014). The plaintiff had alleged that Merisant and Whole Earth label, advertise and market Pure Via products as natural, which she argued was false and deceptive. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, Merisant and Whole Earth agreed to add an asterisk to Pure Via packaging with a statement that directs consumers to the product website, which will explain the process of producing Pure Via from stevia to provide consumers with “significant information to make their own determination as to whether they deem Pure Via to be ‘natural.’” In addition, Merisant and Whole Earth have agreed to…
The parties to litigation alleging that Ghirardelli Chocolate Co. white chocolate products do not contain the requisite white chocolate ingredients to be labeled and promoted as such have agreed to settle the putative nationwide class action for $5.25 million and labeling changes. Miller v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Co., No. 12-4936 (N.D. Cal., motion filed August 20, 2014). Additional information about the case appears in Issues 465 and 479 of this Update. The settlement would also resolve claims to be alleged in a second lawsuit by an intervening named plaintiff regarding the use of “all natural” on product labels. Under the agreement, class members who purchased the company’s Classic White Chips would be able to receive $1.50 per purchase, while those purchasing 72 other “all natural” products would receive $0.75 per purchase. The claims of those with proofs of purchase would not be capped, while claimants without proof of purchase would receive a maximum…
Federal charges have been brought against two owners and two employees of Rancho Feeding Operations, a Petaluma, California-based livestock slaughterhouse, for distributing condemned and diseased cattle in violation of the Federal Meat Inspection Act. United States v. Amaral, No. 14-cr-437 (N.D. Cal., filed August 14, 2014); United States v. Singleton, No. 14-cr-441 (N.D. Cal., filed August 18, 2014). As a result of the investigation giving rise to the charges, Rancho voluntarily recalled some 8.7 million pounds of beef products in February 2014. According to the criminal indictment and information, Jesse Amaral and Robert Singleton, who owned the operation, allegedly directed Eugene Corda, Rancho’s primary yardperson, and Felix Cabrera, the facility’s foreperson, to either (i) remove “USDA Condemned” stamps from cattle carcasses and to process them for transport and distribution, or (ii) place the heads of healthy cows, swapped for diseased heads—from “cancer eye cows”—next to the carcasses of diseased animals while…
