John Wayne Enterprises (JWE) has filed a complaint in California federal court seeking declaratory judgments determining that its usage of the “Duke” trademark is not likely to cause confusion with the trademarks owned by Duke University, which has challenged several JWE trademark applications over the last decade. John Wayne Enterprises, LLC v. Duke Univ., No. 14-1020 (C.D. Cal., filed July 3, 2014). JWE intends to sell bourbon under the name Duke, a nickname John Wayne used since his childhood and which fans still use to affectionately refer to him. Duke University has repeatedly challenged JWE’s past trademark applications by filing notices of opposition and a petition for cancellation of JWE’s owned “Duke” trademarks, alleging that the marks suggest a false connection to the university, would likely confuse consumers and dilute the university’s trademarks. JWE seeks two declaratory judgments to determine that its “Duke” mark does not create any likelihood of…
Category Archives 9th Circuit
A California federal court has dismissed on jurisdictional grounds Quest Nutrition LLC’s lawsuit against Louisiana State University Agricultural Center accusing the school of filing a patent for a sweetener using Quest’s confidential information. Quest Nutrition LLC v. Bd. of Supervisors of LSU Agric. & Mech. Coll., No. 14-2005 (C.D. Cal., order entered July 8, 2014). The court ruled that the majority of Quest’s claims—including those for unfair competition and breach of contract—arose under state law so the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, and the court held that state courts and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office have subject matter jurisdiction over Quest’s patent claims. Quest hired LSU Agricultural Center in 2013 to test a potentially new sweetener and bound the information by a confidentiality agreement. The company alleged that the university succeeded in identifying the formula for the sweetener and filed a patent application with the information that did not list Quest…
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the settlement of class actions alleging consumer fraud in ads portraying Nutella as a healthy breakfast food. In re Ferrero Litigation, No. 12-56469 (9th Cir., decided July 16, 2014) (unpublished). Three members of the certified statewide class objected to the settlement, which provided $550,000 to reimburse class members, required ad-campaign and product-labeling revisions and awarded $985,920 in attorney’s fees. The objectors claimed inadequate notice of the attorney’s fee request, lack of justification or explanation for the fee award and the district court’s failure to consider whether class counsel adequately represented the class. The court found no basis for the objections, noting in part that the district court properly applied the lodestar method to the attorney’s fee calculation and that no indicia of collusion were present. Issue 530
Briefing has been completed before the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) on a petition seeking review of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling upholding California’s prohibition on the sale of food produced by force feeding birds to enlarge the liver beyond normal size. Association des Éleveur de Canards des d’Oies du Québec v. Harris, No. 13-1313 (U.S., distributed for Sept. 29, 2014, conference on July 16). Additional details about the Ninth Circuit’s ruling appear in Issue 497 of this Update. Joining the Canadian and New York foie gras producers that filed the certiorari petition are the attorneys general (AGs) of 13 states. Their amici curiae brief claims that the petition presents an issue of “exceptional importance to the preservation of state sovereignty,” namely, that the lower court’s decision “allows the states to engage in economic isolationism, set themselves against one another, and balkanize the nation, thus giving rise to trade wars…
A federal court in California has granted final approval to the nationwide class settlement of claims that the company which makes Muscle Milk® products deceived consumers by labeling them with the terms “Healthy, Sustained Energy” and “Healthy Fats.” Delacruz v. CytoSport, Inc., No. 11-3532 (N.D. Cal., order entered July 1, 2014). Additional information about the litigation and settlement appears in Issues 403, 436, 475, and 505 of this Update. Under the agreement, CytoSport will pay $1 million to eligible class members and cease using the allegedly deceptive terms on all newly printed packaging for certain products. The company may continue to use the designation “Healthy Fats” on the packaging for Muscle Milk® RTD and related products if they contain “fewer than 0.5 grams of saturated fat per serving, or CytoSport also includes the words ‘See nutrition information for saturated fat content’ in connection with the words ‘Healthy Fats.’” The court also awarded…
Poultry manufacturer Foster Farms has filed an amended complaint in its lawsuit against its Lloyd’s of London insurers, which had rejected its $14.2 million claim for economic losses resulting from a government-mandated shutdown of one of its facilities. Foster Poultry Farms Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, No. 14–953 (E.D. Cal., amended complaint filed July 3, 2014). Foster Farms had paid almost $600,000 for a yearlong product contamination policy to three insurers operating on the Lloyd’s of London insurance market, and the company later filed a claim to cover losses from the forced closure, including costs from the 1.3 million pounds of product it destroyed. The insurers rejected the claim because Foster Farms did not initiate the recall of its chicken, arguing instead that the policy covered economic losses associated with a voluntary recall from customers rather than losses from the destruction of products still in its warehouse. In a…
A California federal court has dismissed with prejudice a putative class action alleging that Hain Celestial Group Inc. mislabels its vegetable juice products as “organic” and “raw” one day before a proposed class action was filed against the company in New York federal court alleging similar claims about its baby foods and home care products. Alamilla, et al. v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No. 13–5595 (N.D. Cal., order entered July 2, 2014); Segedie v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No. 14–5029 (S.D.N.Y., filed July 3, 2014). The California court dismissed the case based on two articles cited and incorporated into the complaint concluding that “pressurization has ‘little or no effects’ on nutritional and sensory quality aspects of foods,” which contradicted the plaintiffs’ argument that the treatment deprives the juice of nutritional value and that the company’s representations that it does not cook the juice are thus misleading. As a result of…
A California federal court has granted motions to amend the judgment in two cases previously dismissed to accord primary jurisdiction to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), each alleging that the defendants mislabeled their food products as including “evaporated cane juice” (ECJ) rather than the more common term, sugar. Swearingen v. Santa Cruz Natural Inc., No. 13–4291 (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., order entered July 1, 2014); Figy v. Amy’s Kitchen Inc., No. 13–3816 (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., order entered July 7, 2014). The court cited “the unique circumstances,” “the potential prejudice to plaintiff,” and “the apparent lack of prejudice to the defendant” in amending its previous decisions to dismiss the cases without prejudice rather than stay them. The plaintiffs had argued that allowing the dismissal to remain rather than issuing a stay through the end of 2014 would likely result in the loss of a year of…
In light of the large number of baby food products at issue and differing product labels used during the six-year class period in litigation alleging misbranding and deceptive labeling against Gerber Products Co., a federal court in California has determined that the class is not ascertainable, a flaw “fatal” to the plaintiff’s motion for class certification. Bruton v. Gerber Prods. Co., No. 12-2412 (N.D. Cal., decided June 23, 2014). Information about an earlier court ruling narrowing the claims in the case appears in Issue 511 of this Update. While the court rejected the company’s reliance on Third Circuit precedent that ruled a class is not ascertainable when purchaser records are unavailable, it did agree with uncontested evidence that consumers would be unable to reliably determine whether they are eligible to join the class. Sixty-nine products were at issue, and 66 of them were “labeled both with and without the challenged labels…
A federal court in California has denied the motion to dismiss filed by The Hain Celestial Group in four consolidated putative class actions alleging that the company deceives consumers by labeling and promoting 10 of its Celestial Seasonings® teas as “100% Natural” when they contain chemical insecticides, fungicides and herbicides. Von Slomski v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No. 13-1757 (C.D. Cal., order entered June 10, 2014). So ruling, the court disagreed that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim or lacked standing, or that the litigation should be dismissed under the primary jurisdiction doctrine. The company challenged the Eurofins test on which the plaintiffs rely to support their claim that the teas contain “significant levels” of man-made, chemical pesticides. According to the defendant, the plaintiffs failed to provide details about the testing, and the study “was published by ‘an admittedly biased short-seller that admits that it issued the report…
