Unilever United States, Inc. has asked a federal district court to dismiss a putative class action charging the company with falsely advertising its “I Can’t Believe It’s Not Butter”® product. Rosen v. Unilever U.S., Inc., No. 09-02563 (N.D. Cal, motion filed November 30, 2009). According to Unilever’s motion, this is a “Private Surgeon General” case that seeks refunds for products purchased over the last four years because Unilever allegedly (i) falsely claims that its products are “Made With A Blend of Nutritious Oils,” and (ii) fails to disclose that the products contain trace amounts of trans fatty acids. Unilever argues that the claims are preempted by federal law which requires a “zero” trans fat content label if the product contains less than 0.5 gram per serving. The company also seeks dismissal under the dormant Commerce Clause, contending that, “If successful, Rosen will Balkanize [trans fat] labeling rules—one set of rules for California…
Category Archives U.S. Circuit Courts
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that animal rights activists and organizations lack standing to challenge the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) interpretation of a 1958 humane animal slaughtering statute in a manner that excludes poultry from its application. Levine v. Vilsack, No. 08-16441 (9th Cir., decided November 20, 2009). The issue arose in a case alleging that “inhumane methods” of poultry slaughter increased the risk of food-borne illness to plaintiff consumers as well as health and safety dangers to plaintiff poultry workers. The court reversed a district court order granting USDA’s motion for summary judgment and remanded the case with instructions to dismiss. According to the court, the plaintiffs had the burden of establishing that their alleged injury “was likely to be redressed by a favorable court decision.” The key to the court’s redressability determination was that the 1958 law’s only enforcement mechanism was later repealed. If…
Plaintiffs’ lawyer William Marler has apparently filed a second lawsuit against New York-based Fairbank Farms for injury allegedly caused by consumption of E. coli-tainted ground beef. According to Marler, the suit has been filed in a Maine state court on behalf of a woman who was hospitalized for six days after consuming meat produced by Fairbank Farms. Her cultures allegedly tested positive for the same E. coli strain found in the company’s recalled meat. See Food Poison Journal, November 17, 2009. Meanwhile, Representative Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) has called on the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Office of Inspector General to investigate the method that meat processors and the agency use to verify that ground beef is free of the bacterium. In her November 12 letter, DeLauro discusses the Fairbank Farms outbreak and notes that the company’s facility sampled its products every 10 to 20 minutes. She states, “However, despite these precautions, it…
Federal courts in Ohio and Kentucky have remanded putative class claims alleging that Applebee’s International, Inc., DineEquity, Inc. and Weight Watchers International, Inc. misrepresented the calorie and nutritional information on the Weight Watchers menu items available in Applebee’s restaurants. Curry v. Applebee’s Int’l, Inc., No. 09-505 (S.D. Ohio, filed November 17, 2009); Kramer v. Applebee’s Int’l, Inc., No. 09-131 (E.D. Ky., filed November 17, 2009). Each plaintiff filed her complaint in state court and sought to certify a class of statewide residents. In July 2009, more than ten months after the complaints had been filed and after some discovery and an unsuccessful mediation had occurred, the defendants removed the cases to their respective federal courts. Writing for both courts, the Ohio district court determined that the defendants had filed for removal too late under the Class Action Fairness Act, which requires that a notice of removal be filed within 30 days…
ConAgra Foods, Inc. has asked a multidistrict litigation (MDL) court to sever and transfer the claims of some of the plaintiffs who filed a lawsuit in October 2009 against the company arising out of the purported Salmonella contamination of its peanut butter. In re: ConAgra Peanut Butter Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 1845 (N.D. Ga., motion filed November 10, 2009). The company has also asked the court to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims for punitive damages, arguing that they have not been sufficiently plead under the new plausibility standard of Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 U.S. 1937 (2009). According to ConAgra’s motion, this lawsuit involves five plaintiffs from four different states, raising serious questions of judicial economy and juror confusion, given that evidence is located in four different states and the legal standards of four different states would have to be applied to the claims. The plaintiffs filed their lawsuit in the same…
According to a news source, a New Jersey court has dismissed fraud-related claims filed against Denny’s Corp. alleging that the company failed to disclose the amount of sodium in its menu items. DeBenedetto v. Denny’s Corp., No. __ (N.J. Super. Ct., dismissed November 10, 2009). Additional details about the litigation appear in issue 312 of this Update. The company reportedly indicated in a statement that the suit was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to and could not establish a physical injury under state product liability law. The named plaintiff in this putative class action reportedly alleged that he had consumed Denny’s foods for more than 20 years and was shocked when he learned how much sodium was in his favorite menu items. While he did not allege any link between the company’s foods and his alleged high blood pressure, the plaintiff claimed that he would not have selected the high-sodium…
A U.S. attorney in Maryland has filed a complaint for injunction against a dairy operation and its owner seeking to stop their alleged long-term misuse of antibiotics in animals that were sold for consumption. United States v. Old Carolina Farm, No. __ (D. Md., filed November 3, 2009). According to the complaint, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Drug Administration and Maryland Department of Agriculture investigations since the mid-1990s showed that drug residues in the tissues of animals the defendants sold exceeded established limits for a number of antibiotics. Contending that consumers of such meats “may experience severe allergic reactions” or develop “antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria,” the complaint alleges that the dairy’s owner ran afoul of the law essentially because he failed and refused to maintain treatment or drug inventory records. The U.S. government seeks permanent injunctive relief to stop the dairy from introducing adulterated food into interstate commerce and from…
An Illinois consumer has filed a putative class action against two food companies in federal court, alleging that they fail to disclose that their high-fiber snacks contain a non-natural fiber derived from chicory root which is purportedly not as effective as natural fiber and can cause harm to some individuals. Turek v. General Mills, Inc., No. 09-7038 (N.D. Ill, filed November 9, 2009). The complaint specifically targets General Mills’ Fiber One Chewy Bars® and Fiber One NonFat Yogurt®, as well as the Fiber Plus Antioxidants Chewy Bars® made by Kellogg Co. The named plaintiff seeks to certify a class of Illinois residents who purchased these products and alleges violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Act. She seeks an order (i) requiring the disclosure of all information in the companies’ possession about the “purported health benefits or non-benefits” of the companies’ products and ingredients, (ii) barring the companies…
A Jewish California resident who follows kosher practices has filed a putative class action on behalf of Hari Krishnas, Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, Taoists, Sikhs, Muslims and Jews against Panda Express, Inc., claiming that the restaurant chain fails to disclose that its vegetable menu items are actually made with significant amounts of chicken stock. Adelpour v. Panda Express, Inc., No. BC425869 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., filed November 12, 2009). The plaintiff alleges that the company does not state in its restaurants, promotional materials or online that its vegetable dishes, such as “Mixed Veggies,” “Eggplant Tofu,” “Chow Mein,” and “Fried Rice,” are prepared with chicken stock and that she was led to believe that these dishes were vegetarian. She also alleges that she was “explicitly informed” by company servers or shift supervisors that such menu items were vegetarian. The named plaintiff seeks to certify a class of “All California residents…
A multidistrict litigation (MDL) court in western Missouri has issued orders disposing of a number of motions in the dozens of cases transferred to it in litigation involving claims of fraud against companies that make baby bottles and sippy cups, reusable drink containers, and baby formula sold in metal cans lined with a substance containing bisphenol A (BPA). In re: Bisphenol-A (BPA) Polycarbonate Plastic Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 1967 (W.D. Mo., orders entered November 9, 2009). The court has dismissed breach of express warranty claims and claims that depend on misrepresentations (as opposed to omissions) for insufficient pleading under Ashcroft v. Iqbal; and breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. Remaining are claims for fraudulent omissions, violation of state consumer protection statutes, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, and unjust enrichment. The court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss on the ground of primary jurisdiction, which applies when a…
