A French organic winemaker has reportedly appeared in court to answer to charges that he defied an official order to spray his vineyard with a pesticide to prevent the spread of a leafhopper insect believed to be responsible for a devastating bacterial disease that has affected vines in Burgundy’s Côte-d’Or region, where Emmanuel Giboulot produces Côte de Beaune and Hautes-Côtes de Nuits organic wines. He claims that the pesticide does not work and is harmful to pollinating insects such as bees. He also apparently insists that more natural means can be used to fight the disease. According to a news source, Giboulot faces a six-month prison sentence and €30,000 (US$41,000) fine for failing to apply the insecticide treatment to his vineyard in July 2013. An online petition about his case has reportedly been signed by more than 40,000 supporters, and a large crowd gathered outside the Dijon court on March…
Category Archives European Courts
The England and Wales Court of Appeal has dismissed the appeal filed by Chobani from a lower court’s grant of permanent injunction barring the company from selling “Greek yogurt” in the United Kingdom, finding that the court did not err in ruling that “FAGE was entitled to restrain Chobani from passing off its American made yoghurt as and for yoghurt made in Greece by the use of the description Greek yoghurt.” FAGE UK Ltd. v. Chobani UK Ltd., [2014] EWCA (Civ) 5 (decided January 29, 2014). Details about the lower court ruling appear in Issue 477 of this Update. Chobani has reportedly indicated that it intends to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court, saying “We remain of the view that the population of the U.K. know and understand Greek yogurt to be a product description regardless of where it is made. We remain committed to the U.K. market and…
Lindt & Spruengli AG is once again facing trademark litigation over its gold-wrapped chocolate candy, this time for its “Teddy,” which Haribo GmbH claims infringes its “Gold-Bears” multi-colored gummy bears product. Lindt was unable to secure a European Union (EU) trademark for its chocolate bunny, but was able to stop Hauswirth in Austria from manufacturing Easter bunnies resembling its bunny. Lindt did not succeed in similar litigation against Reigelein in Germany. Additional information about the EU Court of Justice ruling rejecting the bunny registration appears in Issue 441 of this Update. Lindt and Haribo apparently agreed to ask a German court to resolve their dispute, and an initial hearing occurred in Landgericht Köln in October 2012. The final hearing is scheduled for December 18. Lindt has reportedly indicated that it specifically avoided marketing its bear shaped candy as a “Gold Teddy,” but Haribo complains that the product nevertheless infringes its…
According to news sources, French President François Hollande has said that the country will maintain its prohibition on growing genetically modified (GM) corn sold by Monsanto, despite a Council of State court ruling reversing the moratorium on the ground that it had little legal basis. The ban on MON810 corn has been in effect in France since February 2008 and was extended in 2012. The July 29, 2013, court ruling was the second to overturn the ban—the first ruling, in 2011, was also ignored by former President Nicolas Sarkozy. While Monsanto was not a party, it said in response to the verdict, “The decision by the Conseil d’État is welcome support for a science- and evidence-based approach to GM crop policy in France and the EU. The decision confirms that farmers throughout the EU should have the right to use seeds that European authorities have approved for use throughout the…
According to a news source, U.K. High Court Justice Michael Briggs has ordered New York-based Chobani to change its “Greek” yogurt labels, finding that they mislead more than 50 percent of British consumers into believing that it was made in Greece. Company rival Fage brought the lawsuit to “restrain Chobani from passing off its American-made yoghurt in England and Wales under the description Greek yoghurt.” The court apparently determined that “the very small print used on the rear of Chobani’s pots” stating that the products are made in the United States was “nowhere near sufficient” to alert people to their true origin. Chobani claimed that the “Greek” designation was a reference to how the product is made and not to its country of origin. Danone, which also makes the thickened, strained yogurt products, reportedly indicated that it was considering the implications of the ruling; it was temporarily barred in the…
According to a press report, the U.K. High Court has ordered Danone to remove any reference to “Greek yogurt” on the packaging for its newly launched product Danio®. The matter is currently before the court in litigation involving Greece-based yogurt maker Fage, which sued U.S.-based Chobani Inc. in November 2012 after that company launched its “Greek yogurt” product line in the United Kingdom. While Danone is not apparently required to remove offending products already on store shelves under the injunction, it began complying with the January 30, 2013, court order on products made after that date. In a statement Danone said, “This ruling is in place until the High Court has determined, as part of a separate case with another manufacturer, whether the use of ‘Greek yogurt’ is only possible for yogurt produced in Greece or if it refers to a particular type of yogurt made using a specific process.…
In a long-running dispute between Anheuser-Busch LLC and Budějovický Budvar, národini podnik, the European Union’s (EU’s) General Court has determined that a Czech brewery cannot stop the St. Louis-based company from using the “Bud” mark in a number of EU member nations. Budějovický Budvar, národini podnik v. Anheuser-Busch LLC, Nos. T-225/06 RENV, T-255/06 RENV, T-257/06 RENV, & T 309/06 RENV (Gen. Ct., decided January 22, 2013). The matter was before the court on remand from the Court of Justice. The court found that the Czech brewery’s evidence of sales in France and Austria were so small that the company could not show “trade of a sign of more than mere local significance.” The parties were ordered to pay their own costs.
The General Court of the European Union (EU) has dismissed an annulment action brought by Hungary, seeking to overturn a protected Slovakian designation of origin for wine produced in the Tokaj region which both countries share. Hungary v. Commission, Case T-194/10 (Gen. Ct., decided November 8, 2012). Hungary will have two months to bring an appeal to the Court of Justice, as to points of law only. The European Commission registered the protected designation of origin ‘Vinohradnicka oblast’ Tokaj’ on Slovakia’s behalf in the 2006 and 2007 lists of quality wines produced in specified regions (QWPSR). On July 31, 2009, the day before the EU established the E-Bacchus database to publish the QWPSR lists, Slovakia requested a modified designation— ‘Tokajská/Tokajské/Tokajsky vinohradnicka oblast’—which became the new protected designation on the electronic database. Several months later, Slovakia requested that the Commission revert to the original designation of origin, and the Commission amended the…
A European Court of Justice panel has determined that a German winemaker may not, under European Union law, place labels on its bottles including the word bekömmlich (meaning digestible, wholesome or nourishing). Deutsches Weintor eG v. Land Rehinland-Pfalz, Case C 544/10 (E.C.J., decided September 6, 2012). According to the court, “[b]y highlighting only the easy digestion of the wine concerned, the claim at issue is likely to encourage its consumption and, ultimately, to increase the risks for consumers’ health inherent in the immoderate consumption of any alcoholic beverage. Consequently, the prohibition of such claims is warranted in light of the requirement to ensure a high level of health protection for consumers.” The matter returns to a German court for final ruling.
The European Union (EU) General Court has affirmed a ruling of the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and dismissed the application of a beverage company to register “Royal Shakespeare” as a word mark for its scotch whiskey. Jackson Int’l Trading Co. Kurt D. Brühl GmbH & Co. KG v. OHIM, Case T-60/10 (Gen. Ct., decided July 6, 2012). According to the court, the Royal Shakespeare Co. had registered “Royal Shakespeare Company” three years before Jackson International sought to register its mark, the theater company’s mark has a reputation before the public at large and not among an elite as argued by Jackson International, and the beverage maker’s use of the mark would take “unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.”
