A federal court in Washington has determined that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) did not violate the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in responding to requests for information relating to its investigation of nitrate levels in groundwater and residential drinking water wells in the Lower Yakima Valley. Cmty. Ass’n for Restoration of the Env’t, Inc. v. EPA, No. 13-3067 (E.D. Wash., order entered August 6, 2014). Because the environmental organization (CARE), which is a plaintiff in Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) citizen suits against the dairies whose documents are part of the FOIA requests, also alleged Administrative Procedure Act (APA) violations against EPA, the court granted its request to allow the parties to brief the merits of CARE’s APA claim. Meanwhile, the dairies subject to the RCRA actions have filed a lawsuit against EPA, seeking an order prohibiting EPA from disclosing to CARE or other members of the…
Category Archives Litigation
The U.K. Supreme Court has reportedly refused to consider the appeal filed by Chobani Inc. from an appeals court order dismissing its appeal of a permanent injunction prohibiting the company from designating its U.S.-made yogurt as “Greek” yogurt. Additional details about the January 2014 appeals court ruling appear in Issue 511 of this Update. According to a court spokesperson, three justices dismissed the application for permission to appeal “because the application [did] not raise a point of law of general public importance.” Fage U.K., Ltd., which instituted the litigation, said of the ruling, “The High Court has ended the ‘Greek yogurt’ case, its decision is final. Chobani is forbidden from selling US-made strained yogurt as ‘Greek’ in the United Kingdom.” Fage also reportedly said that Chobani must pay its legal fees. Meanwhile, expressing disappointment in the outcome, Chobani has apparently indicated that it no longer sells its yogurt in Britain,…
While a number of jurors were dismissed because a two-month trial would create hardships for them, a 12-member jury and six alternates were selected on July 31, 2014, and opening statements began the next day in the criminal prosecution of former Peanut Corp. of America (PCA) owner Stewart Parnell, his brother Michael Parnell and the company’s quality control manager Mary Wilkerson. United States v. Parnell, 13-cr-12 (M.D. Ga.). Earlier in the week, the court denied Wilkerson’s motion to dismiss or alternatively for a continuance and severance and to compel meaningful discovery. She claimed that the government’s discovery disclosures “were not accompanied by easily searchable databases” and that she was not timely provided a password to access one of two discovery disclosures. The court had apparently considered some of these issues previously and found that “Wilkerson has not demonstrated any changed circumstances that would require the Court to reconsider its referenced…
The Russian consumer protection agency, Rospotrebnadzor, has reportedly announced that it filed a claim alleging that McDonald’s has misrepresented the nutritional information of several hamburger and ice cream menu items and that two restaurant locations showed traces of E. coli contamination in their salads and Caesar wraps. Although Rospotrebnadzor said it filed a lawsuit on July 3, 2014, a McDonald’s representative told the media in late July 2014 that the company had not received either an official complaint from the court or a notice from the agency. The complaint allegedly accuses McDonald’s of listing nutritional information that indicated its hamburgers and milkshakes had about one-half or one-third of the actual calorie, fat, protein, and carbohydrate counts. According to The New York Times, Russia has targeted food imports during geopolitical tension before, banning cheese and wines from post-Soviet neighbors during times of disagreement with those countries. Following Russia’s annexation of the Crimean…
In a petition for a writ of certiorari, plaintiffs alleging harm by exposure to the flavoring agent diacetyl have argued that the Third Circuit erred in ruling that Aaroma Holdings cannot be held liable for the actions of diacetyl producer Emoral Inc., which Aaroma purchased following the alleged exposures. Diacetyl Plaintiffs v. Aaroma Holdings, No. 14-71 (U.S., petition for writ of certiorari filed July 18, 2014). The terms of the 2010 purchase agreement confirming Aaroma’s acquisition of Emoral apparently noted that Emoral may be subject to diacetyl litigation and stated that Aaroma did not assume liability for any future claims. Emoral filed for bankruptcy protection in 2011, and the bankruptcy trustee reportedly released Aaroma from future diacetyl causes of action against Emoral in exchange for $500,000. In addition to accusing the Third Circuit of diverging from binding precedent on injured creditors’ claims, the plaintiffs’ petition argues that the decision is contrary…
A California federal court has granted the plaintiffs’ request to dismiss their entire action with prejudice in a case accusing Gruma Corp. of labeling its Mission Restaurant Style tortilla chips as “all natural” despite containing genetically modified corn. Cox v. Gruma Corp., No. 12-6502 (N.D. Cal., order entered July 25, 2014). The plaintiffs’ stipulation to dismiss did not indicate whether the parties reached a settlement agreement. In the 2012 complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that Gruma violated state consumer protection laws like the Consumer Legal Remedies Act due to its alleged mislabeling; in July 2014, they debated Gruma’s motion to dismiss, in which the corporation argued that a reasonable customer would not have been misled by their labels, the complaint’s claims infringed the First Amendment, the plaintiffs failed to plead their fraud claims with the particularity required, and the court lacked jurisdiction to issue an injunction. Additional information on the case appears…
A federal court in California has dismissed for lack of standing a putative class action alleging that Pacific Foods of Oregon, Inc. misleads consumers by using the term “evaporated cane juice” (ECJ) on its food labels instead of sugar. Swearingen v. Pac. Foods of Ore., Inc., No. 13-4157 (N.D. Cal., order entered July 30, 2014). Plaintiffs Mary Swearingen and Robert Figy are named plaintiffs in a number of ECJ-related cases that have recently been stayed under the primary jurisdiction doctrine as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration considers its position on use of the term by food makers. Two such cases are summarized in Issue 529 of this Update. The court did not address this issue here, because it dismissed the case on pleading grounds. According to the court, the plaintiffs did not allege that they purchased the company’s products “in reliance on any alleged misrepresentations that evaporated cane juice is…
In consolidated actions pending since 2010, a federal court in California has entered a final order approving a class-action settlement that will require Quaker Oats Co. to remove partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs) from some of its oatmeal products and cease making the statement “contains a dietarily insignificant amount of trans fat” on any product label where the product still contains more than 0.2 grams of artificial trans fat per serving. In re Quaker Oats Labeling Litig., No. 10-0502 (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., San Jose Div., order entered July 29, 2014). Details about a court ruling trimming the plaintiffs’ claims that the company falsely advertised products with PHOs as healthy appear in Issue 433 of this Update. According to the court’s order awarding $760,000 to class counsel in attorney’s fees and costs, the suit and settlement conferred “a significant benefit . . . on the general public” given the product…
In a 9-2 en banc decision, the District of Columbia Circuit has affirmed an earlier panel decision that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) can require meat producers to include country-of-origin labeling (COOL) on their packaging. Am. Meat. Inst. v. USDA, No. 13-5281 (D.C. Cir., order entered July 29, 2014). The First Amendment allows for such required disclosures because the government’s interest is sufficient, the court found. Additional information on the American Meat Institute’s constitutional challenge and the D.C. panel’s decision appears in Issues 518 and 520 of this Update. In its discussion, the court interpreted the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, 471 U.S. 626 (1985) to reach beyond mandated commercial labeling necessary to correct deception to include the “factual and uncontroversial disclosures required to serve other government interests” at issue in the COOL context. The language in Zauderer “sweeps far more broadly than…
According to a putative class action removed to Arkansas federal court, Whole Foods mislabels several of its 365 Everyday Value brand products as “organic” or “all natural” despite containing synthetic ingredients. Stafford v. Whole Foods Market Cal., No. 14-420 (E.D. Ark., removed July 22, 2014). Originally filed in Arkansas state court in June, the complaint accuses several products of mislabeling—for example, the plaintiff says, the 365 Everyday Value soft drink contains carbon dioxide, citric acid, tartaric acid, and caramel coloring despite its “all natural” label. Whole Foods argued to the state court that the potential class contains more than 100 people who seek over $5 million in damages, so the case was removed to federal court. Alleging that Whole Foods violated Arkansas labeling laws and breached warranties, the plaintiff seeks class certification, damages and interest. A similar case filed in New Jersey state court alleges that Breyers, a subsidiary of Unilever…
