A federal court in California has dismissed without prejudice putative class claims that Nature Valley granola bars were fraudulently promoted as “100% Natural” while containing purportedly non-natural ingredients such as high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS). Wright v. General Mills, Inc., No. 08-1532 (S.D. Cal., decided September 30, 2009). The court refused to dismiss the claims as preempted under federal law or under the primary jurisdiction doctrine, which allows courts to stay or dismiss litigation “pending the resolution of an issue within the special competence of an administrative agency.” The dismissal was based instead on the plaintiff’s failure to plead her claims with sufficient specificity under recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings that have, according to the court, dramatically changed the federal courts’ notice-pleading standard. The court determined that the first amended complaint (FAC) “is based on little more than conclusory and speculative factual content . . . Plaintiff argues that her FAC alleges…
Category Archives Litigation
An Ohio appeals court has dismissed negligence, product liability, fraudulent concealment, and civil conspiracy claims filed against companies that supplied diacetyl to a flavoring company that employed two workers who allegedly contracted bronchiolitis obliterans, a debilitating lung disease, from exposure to the butter-flavoring chemical. Doane v. Givaudan Flavors Corp., No. C-080928 (Ohio Ct. App., decided September 25, 2009). Affirming the trial court’s grant of defendants’ motions for summary judgment, the appeals court found, among other matters, that the claims were barred by the statute of limitations and because the employer was a sophisticated purchaser with greater knowledge about the “dangers of diacetyl” than its suppliers.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has filed a putative class-action lawsuit in a Connecticut court on behalf of an Arizona woman who allegedly had a severe allergic reaction from eating artificial chicken patties made with a Quorn Foods, Inc. fungus. Cardinale v. Quorn Foods, Inc., No. __ (Conn. Super. Ct., filed September 15, 2009). CSPI participated in another lawsuit raising similar allegations against the Connecticut-based company and Whole Foods Markets, Inc. in Texas, but those claims were apparently dismissed. According to CSPI, more than 1,000 consumers have contacted it to complain that eating foods containing the meat substitute, described in the complaint as “a proprietary processed, vat-grown, soil fungus, combined with flavorings, binders, and other substances,” causes nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hives, difficulty breathing, or anaphylactic reactions. A CSPI press release characterizes the product as a “fibrous, proteinaceous paste.” The named plaintiff in the Connecticut litigation purportedly…
California residents have filed a putative class action against Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC in federal court, alleging that its frozen food products, if prepared as directed, will not “reach the ‘kill step’ temperature necessary to destroy dangerous bacteria.” Meaunrit v. The Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC, No. 09-4555 (N.D. Cal., filed September 28, 2009). They also claim that the company’s failure “to use appropriate quality control measures within its supply chain,” means that “almost every ingredient in these products is a potential carrier of pathogens, according to government and industry officials.” According to the complaint, “[s]ince there is no reasonable way to know whether Salmonella or other bacteria has [sic] been destroyed based on the design of these products, Plaintiffs and the class suffered harm due to Pinnacle’s conduct.” The named plaintiffs seek to represent a class of either California or U.S. residents, who bought “pot pie products under the Swanson and…
The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) has sued KFC Corp. and its parent Yum! Brands, Inc. in a California court, alleging that they have failed to comply with Proposition 65 (Prop. 65) by selling grilled chicken without warning consumers that it contains a substance, PhIP, known to the state to cause cancer. PCRM v. KFC Corp., No. __ (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., filed September 23, 2009). According to a news source, the allegations are nearly identical to litigation PCRM filed in 2008 against other fast-food restaurants. A court dismissed that complaint, citing the preemption of Prop. 65 claims by federal law which requires chicken to be cooked to food-safe temperatures. PCRM has reportedly appealed the court’s ruling, arguing that the food-safe temperature requirement is merely U.S. Department of Agriculture policy and that states traditionally govern public health and safety issues. KFC was not apparently included in the earlier…
A California man who alleges that he was misled by the packaging and advertising for Cap’n Crunch with Cruncherries® has brought a putative class action against the cereal maker in federal district court. Werbel v. Pepsico, Inc., No. 09-4456 (N.D. Cal., filed September 22, 2009). Alleging violations of California’s unfair competition and false advertising laws, intentional misrepresentation, breach of express and implied warranties, and violations of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, the plaintiff claims that he and a class of California consumers were misled by representations that the product contained fruit. Yet, according to the complaint, “the only fruit content is a touch of strawberry fruit concentrate—twelfth in order on the ingredient list, just after partially hydrogenated soybean oil and ‘natural and artificial flavors,’ and just before malic acid.” According to the complaint, the plaintiff “trusted the Quaker label because of the company’s long history of producing other wholesome breakfast…
A putative class action was reportedly filed in a California state court against Nestlé, alleging that the company falsely advertises its “Juicy Juice Brain Development Fruit Juice” as a product that will improve toddlers’ brain function. Plaintiff Alexis Farmer, who then dismissed the complaint without prejudice several days later, reportedly claimed that she purchased the company’s juice relying on labeling and advertisements stating that it contained DHA Omega-3, a “fatty acid especially important for brain development in children under two years old.” Farmer was seeking damages and injunctive relief; her complaint apparently alleged false and misleading advertising, unjust enrichment, fraud, and civil code violations. See Courthouse News, September 23, 2009. In a related development, Health Canada has apparently decided not to stop infant-formula manufacturers from claiming that DHA, in any amount, will support normal brain and eye development, particularly for children under two. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency asked the…
Without admitting liability for alleged misleading advertising involving its probiotic yogurt products, The Dannon Co. has agreed to settle claims in seven putative class actions for $35 million. Gemelas v. The Dannon Co., Inc., No. 08-00236 (N.D. Ohio, stipulation of settlement filed September 18, 2009). If approved by the court, the settlement would also require the company to modify the advertising and labeling for its Activia® and DanActive® products to explain how they “regulate the digestive system” and to modify promotional statements about the products’ effects on the digestive tract’s immune system. Under the proposed settlement, class claimants can obtain $15 by submitting a claim form, $15-$30 by submitting a claim form signed under penalty of perjury, and $30-$100 by submitting a claim form signed under penalty of perjury and register receipts or other sufficient proofs of purchase. The amount ultimately paid to claimants will depend on the number of…
A federal court in California has determined that the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) erred when it deregulated a genetically engineered (GE) sugar beet without preparing an environmental impact statement. Ctr. for Food Safety v. Vilsack, No. 08-00484 (N.D. Cal., decided September 21, 2009). Thus, the court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the Center for Food Safety and other environmental interest groups and scheduled a hearing for October 30, 2009, to decide what remedies will be appropriate. A court in the same federal district ruled in 2007 that APHIS erred in deregulating GE alfalfa, and this court based its ruling on that decision, which resulted in an effective halt to the use of GE alfalfa. According to the court, which discussed at length how sugar beets are grown and how cross-pollination can occur with non-GE sugar beets and related Swiss chard and…
The representatives of a man who died of botulism have filed a lawsuit in federal court against Malo, Inc. and Massmann Enterprises, Inc., claiming that the companies responsible for maintaining food canning equipment at a Atlanta, Georgia, facility failed to warn owner Bumble Bee Foods, LLC about a leaky water valve . Caffrey et al. v. Malo, Inc. and Massmann Enterprises, Inc., No. 09-104 (S.D. Ga., September 2, 2009). The complaint alleges that the defendants should have known that the defective equipment would prevent the canning process from achieving the high temperatures and pressures necessary for sterilization. The malfunction purportedly resulted in the distribution of botulism-tainted chili, beef stew and hot dog chili sauce that led to the death of Jeffrey Caffrey in September 2007. The sister and mother of the deceased are reportedly seeking $13.5 million for negligence, wrongful death, product liability, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium. See…
