A California egg producer has filed a lawsuit against the state and the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) seeking a declaration that the improvements it has already made to its facilities, referred to as “the enriched colony housing system,” comply with the requirements of Proposition 2 (Prop. 2). JS West Milling Co., Inc. v. California, No. 10-04225 (Cal. Super. Ct., Fresno Cty., filed December 8, 2010). Prop. 2, approved in 2008, prohibits agricultural operations from confining farm animals, for all or the majority of any day, in a way that prevents the animal from “lying down, standing up, and fully extending his or her limbs; and turning around freely.” The plaintiff emphasizes that it does not seek to challenge the voter-approved proposition. Rather, because its requirements are “vague, and there is substantial disagreement among the agricultural community, animal rights groups, and other interested parties as to what they…
Category Archives State Courts
A Florida resident has filed a putative class action against Tropicana Products,Inc. and a retailer, alleging that promotions for Trop50 Pomegranate Blueberry Juice Beverage® are deceptive because the product consists primarily of“a mixture of cheap apple juice and grape juice concentrates.” Cruz v. Tropicana Prods., Inc., No. 10-62926CA08 (Fla. Cir. Ct., Miami-Dade Cty., filed December 14, 2010).Seeking to certify a statewide class of consumers, the plaintiff claims that Tropicana hoped to tap into the “enormous new market”of those seeking to benefit from the antioxidants in blueberries and pomegranates by creating a “deceptive and misleading label with many elements not required by state or federal regulations.” The complaint refers to a September 2010 jury verdict in California finding that Welch Foods, Inc. marketed its 100% Welch’s White Grape Pomegranate® beverage deceptively with labeling that was “literally true” but “had a tendency to deceive a substantial number of consumers.” The complaint also notes…
Seeking to represent a class of California children younger than age 8 and their parents, the mother of a 6-year-old girl has reportedly filed a putative class action against McDonald’s Corp., alleging that it baits children by advertising its “unhealthy Happy Meals” with toys and thus “has helped create, and continues to exacerbate, a super-sized health crisis in California.” Parham v. McDonald’s Corp., No. __ (Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., filed December 15, 2010). Counsel for the plaintiff includes Stephen Gardner with the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), which announced several months ago that it would be filing such a lawsuit. According to the complaint, “Most Happy Meals are too high in calories, saturated fat, and sodium to be healthful for very young children,” and the company “is engaged in a highly sophisticated scheme to use the bait of toys to exploit children’s developmental immaturity and…
A California court has reportedly ordered Dole Food Co. to pay about $200,000 in legal fees and costs to Swedish filmmakers whom the company sued for defamation, alleging that their documentary about the lawyer who sued Dole on behalf of Nicaraguan banana plantation workers exposed to the pesticide DBCP implied that the company caused their deaths. Dole Food Co. v. Gertten, No. __ (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., decided November 17, 2010). The filmmakers filed a motion to strike the lawsuit after it was filed in July 2009 on the ground that it constituted a “strategic lawsuit against public participation,” or SLAPP, which is prohibited by state law. Although Dole apparently dismissed its lawsuit voluntarily thereafter, “[t]he potential distributors were concerned because Dole had only dismissed without prejudice. They had the right to re-file the action,” according to the filmmakers’ counsel. While the film has been distributed in 15…
Two California businessmen have reportedly filed a complaint in small claims court against a Marin County restaurateur, alleging that they were sprayed with hot garlic butter from an exploding snail. Chadwick St.-O’Harra, a former law student, and Steve Righetti were apparently celebrating Righetti’s birthday at a seafood restaurant, when the escargot purportedly exploded, dousing their faces and polo shirts. The men reportedly claim that the incident caused both “humiliation” and “a sense of genuine outrage” and that the restaurateur allegedly responded with “indifference” and “friggin’ rudeness.” The two were dining on a filet-and-lobster combo and a seafood medley and did not reportedly seek immediate medical treatment, choosing instead to finish their meals. According to the restaurant owner, the incident never happened and escargot does not explode. Still, some in the industry have characterized “escargot explosion” as a “rare but periodic phenomenon” that can be attributed to air bubbles trapped inside…
KFC franchisees have reportedly made their closing arguments before a Delaware Chancery Court in a dispute over the company’s advertising policies. They contend that 1997 amendments to the company’s corporate documents gave them the authority to propose and approve different advertising recommendations. The lawsuit was apparently filed after KFC Corp. launched an advertising campaign for grilled chicken menu offerings, which the franchisees opposed for their potential to dilute the company’s fried chicken brand. According to a news source, the franchisees argued that while they can veto funding for advertising by majority vote, this power is illusory because KFC could institute delays, thus causing a blackout that would inflict significant damage on franchisees. The company apparently countered that the franchisees do have the right to make recommendations or modifications to the company’s advertising policy and have exercised that right on several occasions. Still, the company reportedly indicated that the franchisees cannot have…
A Florida man has sued a Houston’s restaurant and its manager for failing to train servers to explain to patrons how to eat grilled artichokes, contending that their negligence led to his hospitalization and exploratory bowel surgery. Carvajal v. Hillstone Restaurant Group, Inc., No. 10-57757 CA 03 (Fla. Cir. Ct., Miami Dade Cty., filed October 27, 2010). He alleges ordering a special item offered by a server, “which Plaintiff advised he had never seen or heard of previously.” According to the complaint, plaintiff Arturo Carvajal was not instructed that the outside portion of the leaf should not be eaten, although the restaurant “had a duty to use reasonable care with respect to the serving and explanation of items not described on the menu; which by their appearance as served appeared wholly consumable.” He is seeking damages in excess of $15,000.
The California Supreme Court has denied a petition for review filed by fast food restaurants seeking to overturn an intermediate appellate court ruling allowing further proceedings on claims that they violated Proposition 65 by selling grilled chicken products to consumers without appropriate warnings about carcinogens created by the cooking process. Physicians Comm. for Responsible Med. v. McDonald’s Corp., No. S186566 (Cal., decided October 27, 2010). The intermediate appellate court determined that federal law did not preempt the claims. Additional information about its ruling appears in Issue 360 of this Update.
According to a news source, an appellate lawyer in California has submitted an amicus brief to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, claiming that the state’s ballot initiative process, adopted 99 years ago, was improperly voted into law. He has asked the court to certify the question to the California Supreme Court. This issue arose in a case involving the validity of Proposition 8, a voter-approved ballot measure that banned same-sex marriage. A federal district court ruled that Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution. If the process that led to the adoption of Proposition 8 is ultimately overturned, it could call into question the validity of Proposition 65, which has required manufacturers and retailers to warn consumers if their products contain chemicals known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive harm. The state has been considering in recent months how to effectively apply the law to the food industry.…
Twenty-seven waiters, busboys and others at New York City’s Del Posto restaurant have reportedly filed a lawsuit against owner Mario Batali and partners Joseph and Lidia Bastianich, claiming that they were not paid a legal wage. The plaintiffs allege that the restaurant’s managers pooled workers’ tips in violation of state labor laws and wrongfully withheld a portion of the gratuities on wine and cheese sales. The tip pool was allegedly divided on the basis of a point system, and the plaintiffs also reportedly contend that staff working banquets did not get their proper share of the service charge billed to customers, instead receiving a flat fee. The suit, which is at least the third involving a Batali-owned facility, seeks back pay, unspecified damages and attorney’s fees. See msnbc.com, October 12, 2010.
