A federal court in Massachusetts has certified a class of Starbucks’ employees
alleging that the company’s policy of requiring tip-sharing by baristas and
their supervisors violates state law; the court also granted the plaintiffs’
motion for summary judgment on that issue. Matamoros v. Starbucks Corp.,
No. 08-10772 (D. Mass., decided March 18, 2011). So ruling, the
court rejected the defendant’s argument that “intractable intra-class conflict”
precludes certification. According to the court, “an interest by certain putative
class members in maintaining the allegedly unlawful policy is not a reason
to deny class certification. Indeed, were the Court to hold otherwise, an
employer could readily insulate itself from class liability simply by establishing
a communal ‘tip pool’ for both managerial and non-managerial employees.
Such an ‘end run’ clearly contravenes the purpose of the Tips law.”

About The Author

For decades, manufacturers, distributors and retailers at every link in the food chain have come to Shook, Hardy & Bacon to partner with a legal team that understands the issues they face in today's evolving food production industry. Shook attorneys work with some of the world's largest food, beverage and agribusiness companies to establish preventative measures, conduct internal audits, develop public relations strategies, and advance tort reform initiatives.

Close