A new Food & Water Watch report claims that the “genetic engineering [GE] of crops and animals for human consumption is not the silver bullet approach
for feeding a growing population that the agribusiness and biotechnology
industries claim it is. Conversely, studies find that GE plants and animals do
not perform better than their traditional counterparts and raise a slew of
health, environmental and ethical concerns.”

According to the consumer watchdog, potential GE food risks include
“increased food allergies and unknown long term health effects in humans;
the rise of superweeds that have become resistant to GE-affiliated herbicides;
the ethical and economic concerns involved with the patenting of life and
corporate consolidation of the seed supply; and the contamination of organic
and non-GE crops and livestock through cross-pollination and seed dispersal.”

Food & Water Watch recommends that U.S. regulators (i) “enact a moratorium on new U.S. approvals of genetically engineered plants and animals; (ii) “institute the precautionary principle for GE foods”; (iii) “develop new regulatory framework for biotech foods”; (iv) “improve agency coordination and increase post-market regulation”; (v) “require mandatory labeling of GE foods”; and (vi) “shift liability of GE contamination to seed patent holders.” See Food & Water Watch News Release, September 29, 2011.

About The Author

For decades, manufacturers, distributors and retailers at every link in the food chain have come to Shook, Hardy & Bacon to partner with a legal team that understands the issues they face in today's evolving food production industry. Shook attorneys work with some of the world's largest food, beverage and agribusiness companies to establish preventative measures, conduct internal audits, develop public relations strategies, and advance tort reform initiatives.

Close