An Oregon federal court has dismissed a lawsuit alleging Gerber’s
Graduates® Puffs is mislabeled because its packaging displays fruits and
vegetables not contained in the product. Henry v. Gerber Prods. Co., No.
15-2201 (D. Ore., order entered April 18, 2016).

The court first denied the plaintiff’s request to remand the case to state
court, then turned to Gerber’s motion to dismiss the claims based on
preemption by the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Gerber argued
that U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations allow the
company to provide visual depictions of the product’s “‛characterizing
flavor,’ even if the product does not actually contain any of the depicted
fruit, or indeed any fruit at all.” The court agreed, finding that the law
is “clear,” even if the “wisdom of the FDA’s regulations on this topic is a
different question for a different day.” The court dismissed the case but
granted leave to amend the complaint.


Issue 601

About The Author


For decades, manufacturers, distributors and retailers at every link in the food chain have come to Shook, Hardy & Bacon to partner with a legal team that understands the issues they face in today's evolving food production industry. Shook attorneys work with some of the world's largest food, beverage and agribusiness companies to establish preventative measures, conduct internal audits, develop public relations strategies, and advance tort reform initiatives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>