The U.K. Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) has released a December 2013 position paper on the purported health effects of aspartame, which is currently being reviewed by the European Food Safety Authority as part of its re-evaluation of all food additives. Commissioned by the U.K. Food Standards Agency (FSA), the paper apparently analyzes a double-blind randomized crossover study conducted by University of Hull York Medical School researchers, who asked 50 participants with self-diagnosed adverse reactions to aspartame to consume a snack bar without knowing whether it contained the substance in question. Based on the study’s findings, which compared the responses of these participants to a control group, COT has concluded that “the results presented did not indicate any need for action to protect the health of public.” The committee will release the full minutes of its discussion once the study has been…
Tag Archives artificial sweetener
While continuing to deny that its labeling and marketing for Truvia® sweetener products misled consumers, Cargill has apparently agreed to settle a putative nationwide class action alleging consumer fraud and breach of warranty. Martin v. Cargill, Inc., No. 13-2563 (D. Minn., preliminary agreement filed September 19, 2013). The plaintiffs claimed that the products are not “natural” because they contain “highly processed” ingredients or those derived from genetically modified organisms. Under the agreement, the company would create a $5 million fund for cash refunds and vouchers on selected Truvia® products. The company has also agreed to modify product labels that will refer consumers to its website where it will explain in some detail how the erythritol in Truvia® is produced. Cargill has agreed not to oppose attorney’s fees and expenses of $1.59 million. Any residual funds remaining in the settlement fund would be distributed to the National Consumer Law Center and…
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has concluded that the sweetener advantame is safe for human consumption. Derived from aspartame and vanillin, advantame is reportedly 37,000 times sweeter than sugar and 100 times sweeter than aspartame and can be used to enhance flavors such as fruit, citrus and mint and to extend the sweetness duration in chewing gum. The agency has established an acceptable daily intake of 5 mg per kilogram of body weight per day. See ajinomoto.com.
A Hawaii resident has filed a putative nationwide class action against Cargill, Inc., alleging that the company falsely advertises its Truvia® sweetener product as “natural” when it is actually made from ingredients that are “either synthetic or harshly chemically processed.” Howerton v. Cargill, Inc., No. 13-0336 (D. Haw., filed July 8, 2013). According to the complaint, the company markets the product with “natural imagery such as the leaves of the stevia plant,” yet “the stevia-derived ingredient, Reb A, is not the natural crude preparation of stevia, but rather is a highly chemically processed and purified form of the stevia leaf extract,” and Reb A “comprises only 1% of Truvia.” The plaintiff alleges that “the main ingredient, erythritol, which Cargill also purports to be a natural ingredient derived through natural processes, is not made like it is in nature, but rather is synthetically made. Cargill describes the process of obtaining stevia…
A recent opinion piece published in Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism has suggested that artificial sweetener consumption increases the risk of certain health outcomes, including “excessive weight gain, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.” Susan Swithers, “Artificial sweeteners produce the counterintuitive effect of inducing metabolic derangements,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, July 2013. Authored by Purdue University Professor of Behavioral Neuroscience Susan Swithers, the article hypothesizes that “consuming sweet-tasting but noncaloric or reduced-calorie food and beverages interferes with learned responses that normally contribute to glucose and energy homeostasis.” To this end, Swithers points to several prospective cohort and interventional studies linking artificially-sweetened beverages to “a variety of negative health outcomes,” as well as research examining physiological responses to high-intensity sweeteners, which are “largely inert with regard to effects on glucose homeostasis because they do not reliably elicit post-ingestive responses similar to caloric sugars.” Based on these findings, she argues…
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recently announced its decision to delay its final opinion on the safety of aspartame until November 2013 “to allow sufficient time to consider and address feedback, including new information, resulting from the public consultation on its draft opinion.” According to the agency, the Scientific Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Food (ANS Panel) received more than 200 comments on its January 9, 2013, draft opinion “on issues such as how EFSA’s experts select studies for its risk assessments, the safety of the metabolites of aspartame and how best to express uncertainties highlighted in the draft opinion.” Based on this feedback, ANS Panel experts have purportedly “identified aspects of their draft opinion and key steps in their scientific approach that they would like to clarify further, including the expression of uncertainties, before finalizing their conclusions.” Finding that aspartame and its breakdown products “pose…
A federal court in California has granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss the first amended complaint in a putative class action alleging that the companies falsely label and market Splenda Essentials with Antioxidants®, Splenda Essentials with Fiber® and Splenda Essentials with B Vitamins®. Bronson v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc., No. 12-4184 (N.D. Cal., order entered April 16, 2013). Dismissed with leave to amend were claims brought under the Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law and Consumers Legal Remedies Act to the extent that the claims include statements made on the defendants’ website or in print ads. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to allege that they relied on these statements when purchasing the products. Also dismissed with leave to amend are claims about the Fiber and B Vitamins products because the plaintiffs relied on lack of scientific substantiation theories which cannot be asserted…
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reportedly received “more than 30,000 comments” in response to its request for information about a petition filed by dairy-industry groups asking the agency to drop special labeling requirements for flavored milks that contain artificial sweeteners such as aspartame. The International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) and the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) have asked FDA “to amend the standard of identity for flavored milk and 17 other dairy products (including nonfat dry milk, heavy cream, eggnog, half-and-half and sour cream) so that nonnutritive sweeteners are among the standard ingredients,” thus exempting the products from having to make nutrient content claims such as “reduced calorie” in a more prominent location. “If we granted the petition, a carton of chocolate milk made with nonnutritive sweeteners would simply say ‘chocolate milk,’ the same as a carton made with nutritive sweeteners, such as sugar,” said FDA Food Labeling…
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has announced an April 9, 2013, scientific meeting to discuss its draft opinion on the re-evaluation of aspartame (E951). Issued by the agency’s Scientific Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Food (ANS Panel), the re-evaluation declined to revise the current Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) for aspartame after concluding that the substance and its breakdown products “pose no toxicity concern for consumers at current levels of exposure.” Additional details about this conclusion appear in Issue 466 of this Update. The follow-up meeting seeks to clarify any comments received during the draft opinion’s consultation period, which ended February 15. Before adopting its final opinion on aspartame, the ANS Panel will take into account these responses and meeting discussions, as well as issue a separate report that outlines these proceedings. EFSA has asked “scientific experts in the field of food safety and parties who…
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced that the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) and the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) have filed a petition requesting that the agency amend the standard of identity for milk and 17 other dairy products “to provide for the use of any safe and suitable sweetener as an optional ingredient.” FDA is seeking comments and other information by May 21, 2013. IDFA and NMPF have evidently asked FDA to amend the milk standard of identity to allow optional characterizing flavoring ingredients used in milk— such as chocolate—to be sweetened with any safe and suitable sweetener, including non-nutritive sweeteners such as aspartame. According to IDFA and NMPF, the proposed amendments “would promote more healthful eating practices and reduce childhood obesity by providing for lower-calorie flavored milk products.” In particular, the petitioners claim that lower-calorie flavored milk would assist “in meeting several initiatives aimed at…
