A federal court in California has approved the settlement of class claims against Wendy’s International, Inc. involving its use of trans fats in fried food products. Yoo v. Wendy’s Int’l, Inc., No. 07-04515 (C.D. Cal., filed March 13, 2009). In its revised order and final judgment, the court overruled objections to the settlement, certified a nationwide settlement class and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. The defendant was ordered to add $450,000 plus interest to the $1.8 million already in an escrow account to be divided equally among the American Cancer Society, American Diabetes Association, American Dietetic Association, and American Heart Association. The court also ordered the defendant to ensure that its fried foods are cooked in oil containing a level of trans fat per serving that “can be represented as 0 grams of trans fat,” under Food and Drug Administration regulations. Wendy’s was further ordered to “pay for and subject its…
Tag Archives California
A California judge has reportedly ordered the parties to litigation over the exposure of banana-plantation workers to a pesticide that allegedly caused their sterility to explain why two lawsuits should not be dismissed as a sanction for the alleged misconduct of the plaintiffs and their lawyers. Mejia v. Dole, No. BC340049 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty.). In 2008, a jury awarded six Nicaraguan workers $5.8 million in damages in the first of several such cases to be tried in the United States; the court reduced the verdict by half, and the case is on appeal. Thereafter, the defendant began filing the depositions of Nicaraguan witnesses who claimed that (i) some of the plaintiffs had never worked on banana farms, (ii) work certificates and lab reports had been falsified, and (iii) some of the plaintiffs have children, despite their sterility claims. The court reportedly stayed the personal-injury lawsuits and ordered…
A California appeals court has determined that canned tuna sold in the state does not need a mercury warning label under Proposition 65 (Prop. 65) for reproductive toxicity because the mercury is naturally occurring and thus falls within a Prop. 65 exemption. People ex rel. Brown v. Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC, No. A116792 (Cal. Ct. App., decided March 11, 2009). A trial court ruled in 2006 that the labels were not required because (i) federal law preempts state action on methylmercury in fish; (ii) the trace levels of mercury in canned tuna were too insignificant to require warnings; and (iii) the mercury is naturally occurring. Further information about that ruling appears in issue 170 of this Update. The appeals court specifically considered and based its ruling on the last basis for decision only, finding that substantial evidence supported the trial court’s determination as to the source of mercury contamination in fish.…
California EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has published a notice seeking public comment on its latest proposal to add candidate chemicals to the state’s Proposition 65 (Prop. 65) list of chemicals known to the state to pose a cancer or reproductive health risk. Aspartame is among the 38 chemicals OEHHA is considering adding to the list. Comments on the proposal must be submitted by May 5, 2009, and the agency’s Carcinogen Identification Committee will meet May 29 to “provide OEHHA with advice on the prioritization of these chemicals for possible preparation of hazard identification materials.” According to OEHHA, “[n]o listing decisions will be made concerning these chemicals at the May 29 meeting.”
A putative class action filed in a California federal court against Snapple Beverage Corp. alleges that the company misleads consumers by labeling as “All Natural” products containing high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and using the names of fruits for some products that “do not contain any significant amount of the fruit listed in the product’s name.” Von Koenig v. Snapple Beverage Corp., No. 09-00337 (E.D. Cal., filed March 4, 2009). The named plaintiff seeks to certify two subclasses of California consumers “to redress Defendant’s deceptive, misleading and untrue advertising and unlawful, unfair and fraudulent business acts and practices.” One subclass would involve those who purchased the company’s “All Natural Products” that contained HFCS; the other would include those who purchased “Fruit Products . . . which included the name or picture of a fruit in the product name or label but which did not contain a substantial amount of that…
California consumers have filed a putative class action against Van’s International Foods and retailers Whole Foods Market California, Inc., Trader Joe’s Co., and Costco Wholesale Co., alleging that Van’s frozen waffles did not accurately state the calorie and nutrient content throughout 2007 and into 2008. Hodes v. Van’s Int’l Foods, No. 09-01530 (C.D. Cal., filed March 4, 2009). According to the complaint, which seeks certification of a nationwide class, the sale in late 2006 of the company that made Van’s frozen waffles involved a change in personnel that required “reverse engineering the recipes for Van’s existing product lines.” That process allegedly resulted in findings that the nutritional information on the product packaging “contained numerous substantial inaccuracies.” The calorie, fat, sodium, carbohydrates, calcium, iron, and fiber content listed purportedly varied by 20 to 100 percent or more from the actual nutritional values. The plaintiffs allege that the company continued to “distribute…
California EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) convened a conference call for stakeholders February 18, 2009, to discuss how to move forward with plans to require food retailers to warn the public about the presence of Proposition 65 (Prop. 65) chemicals in foods. OEHHA’s general objectives are to prepare regulatory language vetted by stakeholders and undertake formal notice-and-comment regulatory proceedings by June. The agency seeks assistance on drafting provisions about (i) manufacturer versus retailer responsibilities relating to warning information; (ii) structure, process and operation of a proposed information/warning clearinghouse; (iii) methods of delivering warnings; and (iv) establishing the content of warning messages. Volunteers are currently being solicited to join drafting groups, and initial drafts are expected to be completed by April 17. OEHHA will post the drafts on Cal/EPA’s Web site, and another stakeholders’ meeting will be held on April 23. Prop. 65 requires warnings about chemicals known to…
A federal court in California has denied a motion to dismiss putative class claims that Arizona Beverage Co. deceptively labels its products as “100% Natural,” “All Natural,” or “Natural,” despite using high-fructose corn syrup as an ingredient. Hitt v. Arizona Beverage Co., LLC, No. 08-809 (S.D. Cal., order entered February 4, 2009). The complaint also alleges that those beverages with fruit in the name are deceptively labeled because they “do not contain any substantial amount of the fruit named on the label.” The defendants sought to dismiss claims that they violated consumer fraud statutes by contending that they are expressly and impliedly preempted under federal law. The court summarily ruled that the plaintiff’s claims were not expressly preempted because they do not fall within any of the express preemption provisions of the Nutritional Labeling and Education Act. The court also ruled that the claims were not impliedly preempted because (i) the…
A federal court has refused to dismiss putative class claims filed under California’s consumer protection law against a company that advertises its pasta sauce, which contains high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), as “all natural.” Lockwood v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., No. 08-04151 (N.D. Cal., decided February 3, 2009). The defendant sought to dismiss the claims on preemption grounds and called for the class allegations to be stricken “because plaintiffs cannot prove reliance on a class-wide basis.” According to the court, the federal Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) does not apply to the “complaint as currently pled. Plaintiffs do not allege that defendant’s pasta sauce contains artificial flavoring, coloring or a chemical preservative; rather, they allege that the ‘high fructose corn syrup’ is not produced by a natural process and therefore the pasta sauce is not ‘all natural.’” The court also found that the claims were not impliedly preempted because “Congress has explicitly stated…
POM Wonderful LLC has reportedly brought false advertising and unfair competition claims in federal court against Welch Foods Inc. for marketing a product with little pomegranate juice as a “white grape and pomegranate” juice. POM Wonderful LLC v. Welch Foods Inc., No. 09-00567 (C.D. Cal., filed January 23, 2009). According to a news source, POM Wonderful has built a multimillion-dollar business by making and marketing the health benefits of a pomegranate juice-based product line. The company alleges that Welch has taken advantage of its success by developing an intentionally confusing and misleading product and implying “that its product is of the same composition and quality of blended pomegranate juices such as plaintiff’s blended pomegranate juices, when in fact Welch’s has substituted much of the valuable and beneficial substance of pomegranate juice with economically and nutritionally inferior juices such as apple.” POM Wonderful apparently alleges that Welch has violated the false advertising…
