Tag Archives food safety

The Farm Foundation recently hosted a public forum titled “The Future of Food Safety Regulation” to discuss agricultural, food and rural policies designed to revamp the current regulatory system. Held April 7, 2009, at the National Press Club, the forum featured a panel of experts that included Jim Hodges of the American Meat Institute, Carol Tucker Foreman of the Consumer Federation of America’s Food Policy Institute; Scott Horsfall of the California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement; and Margaret Glavin, an independent consultant and former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official. Glavin reportedly identified the global food market as “the single biggest challenge” facing U.S. agencies and recommended modernizing laws to promote a uniform approach to food safety. Noting the high cost of legislative proposals that would create one umbrella agency, Glavin instead argued for increased FDA funding and the authority to enforce import requirements and conduct overseas inspections. “Our regulations and…

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced that U.S. marshals executed an inspection warrant at Westco Fruit and Nuts, Inc., in Irvington, New Jersey, after the company refused to recall its peanut products or provide access to distribution documents in the wake of the Salmonella outbreak involving peanuts from the Peanut Corp. of America (PCA). An FDA spokesperson said, “FDA’s enforcement action against Westco Fruit and Nuts is an appropriate step toward removing potentially harmful products from the marketplace, especially when, as in this case, a company is unwilling to share information FDA needs to ensure food safety. FDA uses all appropriate legal means necessary to obtain information and fully investigate firms or individuals who put the health of consumers at risk.” Apparently, Westco purchased oil-roasted and salted peanuts from PCA in November and December 2008. It sold them in various sizes and packages and used them as an…

The Obama administration has reportedly issued a tough warning that it will substantially change the way government oversees food safety. According to published reports, food-handling practices that formerly would have resulted in mild warnings from FDA may now lead to wide-ranging and expensive recalls.“ The food industry needs to be on notice that FDA is going to be much more proactive and move things faster,” David Acheson, FDA associate commissioner for food protection, was quoted as saying. “We’re going to try to stop people from getting sick in the first place, as opposed to waiting until we have illness and death before we take action.” Meanwhile, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a report April 9 claiming the nation’s food safety system needs a thorough overhaul and that even though cases of Salmonella may be increasing, their incidence is not statistically significant. The system should be overhauled,…

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has reportedly commissioned a study showing that one-quarter of food facilities contacted by federal health investigators were unaware of laws requiring them to trace their suppliers. Authored by HHS Inspector General Daniel Levinson, the report also found that despite federal regulations, most food manufacturers and distributors were unable to identify the suppliers or recipients of their products. Levinson has apparently recommended that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seek greater authority from Congress to require and ensure that food facilities maintain adequate records. According to The New York Times, which obtained a copy of the report expected to be released at a congressional hearing next Thursday, the department’s findings may help explain why many small food makers continue to issue peanut-related recalls more than two months after the Peanut Corp. of America was implicated in a Salmonella outbreak linked to nine deaths…

President Barack Obama (D) has reportedly tapped former New York City Health Commissioner Margaret Hamburg to lead the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Baltimore Health Commissioner Joshua Sharfstein to act as her deputy. A bioterrorism expert and physician, Hamburg previously served as an assistant health secretary in the Clinton administration and helped decrease the rate of drug-resistant tuberculosis during her tenure at the New York City Health Department. Her selection has drawn praise from consumer watchdogs, food safety advocates and medical groups such as the American Public Health Association, which said both nominations reflect Obama’s “commitment to protecting consumer safety.” “You’ve got an organization that’s demoralized and one that really wants to enhance its scientific integrity,” an association spokesperson was quoted as saying. “[Hamburg’s] all about integrity and science . . . She can be tough when she needs to be, and she’s going to need to be real…

Chinese legislators this week passed a new food safety law that consolidates hundreds of regulations, imposes stricter penalties for safety violations and establishes a national commission based in the Ministry of Health to monitor the food and beverage industry, improve standards and authorize product recalls. Effective June 1, 2009, the law will also hold celebrities liable for endorsing faulty products; require farmers to abide by stricter rules pertaining to pesticides, fertilizers, veterinary drugs, and feed additives; and implement record-keeping requirements for farmers raising crops and livestock for human consumption. Loopholes in the Chinese food safety system attracted international attention last year when melamine-tainted infant formula produced by the state-owned Sanlu Group dairy sickened thousands of children. “At present, China’s food security situation remains grim, with high risks and contradictions popping out,” the ministry stated in a press release. See Marler Blog, March 1, 2009. The new law has already drawn criticism…

“The plants in Texas and Georgia that were sending out contaminated peanut butter and ground peanut products had something else besides rodent infestation, mold and bird droppings. They also had federal organic certification,” opines this article examining a marketplace perception that organic food is both healthier and safer than conventional products. The authors suggest that a convoluted organic certification program has subverted an organic ethos “built on purity and trust . . . between the farmer and the customer.” With fees sometimes exceeding thousands of dollars, manufacturers are apparently dependent on a “web of agents” sponsored by those farmers and operations seeking certification. “A private certifier took nearly seven months to recommend that the USDA revoke the organic certification of the peanut company’s Georgia plant, and then did so only after the company was in the thick of a massive recall,” states the article, which notes that agents are required…

“An examination of the largest food poisoning outbreaks in recent years – in products as varied as spinach, pet food, and a children’s snack, Veggie Booty – show that auditors failed to detect problems at plants whose contaminated products later sickened consumers,” claims this article exploring the role of private inspectors in the current food safety system. The authors point to the recent Salmonella outbreak linked to a Peanut Corp. of America (PCA) plant in southwest Georgia. According to a March 27, 2008, internal audit obtained by The New York Times, the operation received a food safety rating of “superior” from a third-party inspector hired by PCA to verify plant conditions on behalf of the Kellogg Co. and other food companies supplied by the peanut processor. “Federal investigators later discovered that the dilapidated plant was ravaged by Salmonella and had been shipping tainted peanuts and paste for at least nine months,” opines…

A federal court has granted the meat industry’s motion for a preliminary injunction and ordered California not to enforce a law, adopted on January 1, 2009, that would have required the immediate euthanization of nonambulatory animals in slaughterhouses regulated by the Federal Meat Inspection Act. Nat’l Meat Ass’n v. Brown, No. 08-1963 (E.D. Cal., decided February 19, 2009). The court found that the plaintiffs had a strong likelihood of success on the merits of their claim that the state law is expressly and impliedly preempted by the federal statute and that they were likely to suffer irreparable harm because some proscribed conduct is punishable by criminal fines and the state is immune from paying for other potential monetary losses. Balancing the public interests involved, the court found that the safety of the public food supply and the humane treatment of animals are adequately protected by the federal law. According to a…

With more than a half dozen food-safety bills already pending before the 111th Congress, legislators have continued to introduce or re-introduce legislation from prior sessions to address the government oversight problems exposed by the latest food contamination outbreak. Details about earlier measures appear in issue 291 of this Update. Among the new proposals are: H.R. 999 – Re-introduced February 11, 2009, by Representative Peter Roskam (R-Ill.), this bill would establish certification standards for food-testing laboratories and require importers to certify the safety of their operations. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. S. 425 – Re-introduced February 12, 2009, by Senator Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), this proposal would give the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) mandatory recall authority and would create a new food tracking system. Referred to the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry. S. 429 – Re-introduced February 12,…

Close