A perspective article published in the May 9, 2013, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) urges local governments to consider supplementing the federal Affordable Care Act’s (ACA’s) menu-labeling provisions with their own laws designed to improve consumer responsiveness to the calorie listings and increase overall compliance among businesses. Sara Bleich and Lainie Rutkow, “Improving Obesity Prevention at the Local Level—Emerging Opportunities,” NEJM, May 2013. Noting that many local governments “have already begun engaging in innovative regulatory activity related to obesity prevention (e.g., pre-ACA local menu-labeling laws) and will continue to do so,” the authors propose several strategies for influencing consumer behavior through more robust menu-labeling requirements, such as “presenting consumers with calorie information in the form of a physical-activity equivalent (e.g., minutes of running required to burn off a particular food)” instead of a straight calorie count; “replacing the default fries and soda in a child’s meal with apple…
Tag Archives labeling
A federal court in New York has amended the preliminary injunction entered against Kangadis Food Inc., doing business as The Gourmet Factory, originally requiring that the company send stickers to affix to all products sold as “100% Pure Olive Oil” and provided to wholesalers and retailers before March 1, 2013, because those products were actually made from Pomace, a processed oil made from olive pits, skins and pulp. N. Am. Olive Oil Ass’n v. Kangadis Food Inc., No. 13-868 (S.D.N.Y., order entered May 7, 2013). Additional information about the earlier injunction appears in Issue 482 of this Update. The stickers were intended to inform consumers that the products were not “100% Pure Olive Oil.” The parties sought reconsideration after Kangadis indicated that it would prefer to recall its products from wholesalers and replace them with tins and bottles that do not contain Pomace. The plaintiff trade association agreed to allow…
A federal court in New York has agreed to impose some of the preliminary injunctive relief requested by the North American Olive Oil Association in litigation alleging that Kangadis Food Inc., doing business as The Gourmet Factory, falsely labeled its product as “100% Pure Olive Oil” when it actually contained Pomace or was 100 percent refined olive oil. N. Am. Olive Oil Ass’n v. Kangadis Food Inc., No. 13-868 (N.D.N.Y., order entered April 25, 2013). The court agreed that consumers would likely be confused about Pomace, “an industrially processed oil produced from olive pits, skins, and pulp,” labeled as “100% Pure Olive Oil,” and agreed that the defendant, which had changed its product as of March 1, 2013, to remove the Pomace and sell instead 100 percent refined olive oil as “100% Pure Olive Oil,” likely had a significant amount of its old product on store shelves. Accordingly, the court…
U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Or.) have introduced companion bills (S. 809; H.R. 1699) that would amend the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the makers of genetically engineered (GE) foods and foods with GE ingredients to include this information on their labels. Noting that the Food and Drug Administration stated in 1992 that such labels were unnecessary because GE foods were not “materially” different from other foods, Boxer characterized this approach as antiquated and said, “Common sense would indicate that GE corn that produces its own insecticide—or is engineered to survive being doused by herbicides—is materially different from traditional corn that does not. Even the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has recognized that these foods are materially different and novel for patent purposes.” One Republican representative has agreed to co-sponsor the legislation; the remaining support is from Democratic senators and representatives. According to…
A federal court in California has ordered Bumble Bee Foods, LLC to produce “documents dating back to 2004 regarding the marketing and labeling strategies for the products [plaintiff] purchased and for products with the same Omega-3 label or with nearly identical labels” in a putative nationwide consumer-fraud class action. Ogden v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, No. 12-1828 (N.D. Cal., order entered April 16, 2013). The named plaintiff seeks to represent class members who purchased products she did not buy and purchased a product made by a separate company that is not a defendant in the case. According to the court, the discovery dispute was about whether Bumble Bee “must produce discovery on all of its products . . . from eight years prior to the initiation of this lawsuit . . . [and involving] King Oscar.” The court determined that it was not appropriate to consider whether the named plaintiff has…
A federal court in California has granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss the first amended complaint in a putative class action alleging that the companies falsely label and market Splenda Essentials with Antioxidants®, Splenda Essentials with Fiber® and Splenda Essentials with B Vitamins®. Bronson v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc., No. 12-4184 (N.D. Cal., order entered April 16, 2013). Dismissed with leave to amend were claims brought under the Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law and Consumers Legal Remedies Act to the extent that the claims include statements made on the defendants’ website or in print ads. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to allege that they relied on these statements when purchasing the products. Also dismissed with leave to amend are claims about the Fiber and B Vitamins products because the plaintiffs relied on lack of scientific substantiation theories which cannot be asserted…
Two California residents who recently sued Trader Joe’s for allegedly misbranding certain foods by using “organic evaporated cane juice” on its product labels have filed a putative nationwide class action against a yogurt company with similar allegations. Gitson v. Clover Stornetta Farms, Inc., No. 13-1517 (N.D. Cal., filed April 4, 2013). Details about the Trader Joe’s lawsuit appear in Issue 477 of this Update. The named plaintiffs contend that the defendant markets some 14 different flavors of its yogurt products, all of which list “organic evaporated cane juice” as an ingredient on their labels “in violation of a number of labeling regulations.” They cite Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, warning letters and an open letter to demonstrate that use of this term for a yogurt sweetener is “illegal.” The plaintiffs also target the company’s websites for their alleged used of “illegal claims.” According to the complaint, they relied on…
A federal court in California has dismissed consumer-fraud putative-class claims filed in a first amended complaint against the Ghirardelli Chocolate Co., alleging violations pertaining to white chocolate products that the named plaintiff did not purchase. Miller v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Co., No. 12-4936 (N.D. Cal., order entered April 5, 2013). Details about a similar order entered as to the original complaint appear in Issue 465 of this Update. While the court disagreed with the defendant that the products were dissimilar because its label description—“Ghirardelli® Chocolate”—is like a Dunkin’ Donuts logo used on products, such as coffee, that are clearly not donuts, the court found that “an ‘unlawful’ claim based on ‘chocolate’ necessarily reaches back to the FDA definition. Identity labeling of food requires—under the plain language of the regulation that the statement of identity of the commodity on the principal display panel of a food in package form be ‘the name…
A federal court in California has dismissed in part the first amended complaint in a putative class action against Frito-Lay and PepsiCo, alleging that the companies falsely advertised and labeled their products as “All Natural,” “0 Grams Trans Fat,” “No MSG,” “low sodium,” “healthy,” and with other unspecified health claims. Wilson v. Frito-Lay N. Am., Inc., No. 12-1586 (N.D. Cal., order entered April 1, 2013). Dismissed with prejudice were claims that the companies breached warranties under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. Among the claims that the plaintiffs will be allowed to amend are the allegations against PepsiCo, dismissed due to insufficient pleading; allegations involving products not specifically named or described in the complaint; and a claim for restitution based on unjust enrichment, which should have been pleaded in the alternative. To the extent that the plaintiffs based their unfair, false and deceptive advertising claims…
A federal court in California has decertified and entered summary judgment against a statewide class alleging that AriZona Iced Tea beverages with “All Natural,” “100% Natural” and “Natural” labels violated state consumer protection laws because they contain high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and citric acid, ingredients alleged by the plaintiffs to be man-made. Ries v. AriZona Beverages USA LLC, No. 10 01139 (N.D. Cal., decided March 28, 2013). Additional information about this case and similar litigation before a New Jersey court appears in issues 360, 408 and 463 of this Update. According to the court, the plaintiffs failed to produce any evidence or timely identify any expert who could prove that HFCS and citric acid are not natural. They claimed that they would be able to do so during the “merit state of discovery,” but failed to produce such evidence within the court’s discovery deadlines. Nor, according to the court,…
