A New York resident has filed a putative class action against Diamond Pet Foods and Amazon.com, seeking medical monitoring for pets that consumed recalled Salmonella-tainted pet food. Cohen v. Schell & Kampeter, Inc., d/b/a Diamond Pet Foods, No. 12-3299 (E.D.N.Y., filed July 2, 2012). Plaintiff Steven Cohen alleges that he fed his dogs Taste of the Wild® brand pet food, purchased from Amazon.com, and that they became ill, vomiting frequently, “which caused damage to Plaintiff’s property.” Seeking to certify a nationwide class and statewide subclass of consumers, the plaintiff alleges breach of implied and express warranty, strict products liability, violations of state consumer fraud laws, negligence, and unjust enrichment. In addition to medical monitoring, the plaintiff seeks actual damages or restitution, attorney’s fees, costs, and interest. A Canadian non-profit representing the interests of foie gras producers, a New York-based foie gras producer and a company that operates restaurants in California have…
Tag Archives Missouri
A multidistrict litigation court in Missouri has denied motions for class certification in 24 transferred cases against companies that make baby bottles and sippy cups allegedly containing bisphenol A (BPA). In re: Bisphenol-A (BPA) Polycarbonate Plastic Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 1967 (W.D. Mo., decided July 5, 2011). The plaintiffs sought to certify various classes, including individual state classes and multi state classes as to certain claims and defendants. The court focused on the commonality, predominance and superiority prongs of class certification to conclude that differences in state laws and facts unique to each putative class member rendered the claims unsuitable for class treatment. Still, the court dismissed the requests to certify individual statewide classes without prejudice, finding it appropriate to allow the transferor courts to determine whether these classes met the certification requirements when the cases are returned to their jurisdictions. The court also indicated that it would delay remand…
A federal grand jury has indicted a husband and wife who own a grain storage company in northwestern Missouri, alleging that they conspired to victimize more than 100 farmers at an estimated loss exceeding $3.1 million by selling grain the farmers owned without paying them and by commingling and embezzling the farmers’ money. United States v. Froman, No. 11-06005 (W.D. Mo., filed April 21, 2011). The indictment alleges that “grain (primarily corn and soybeans), which was owned by various farmers who contracted with Gallatin Grain, was sold by the Fromans without the farmers’ permission and the proceeds of the sale were wrongfully withheld by the Fromans.” Counts of conspiracy, mail fraud and bank fraud have been brought against both Daniel and Pauline Froman. Daniel has also been charged with one count of wire fraud and one count of interstate transportation of stolen property. Prison terms of up to 30 years…
A federal court in Missouri has denied in part and granted in part the summary judgment motions filed by Texas and Louisiana rice farmers as well as the company they sued in the first group of cases in this multidistrict litigation (MDL) to be remanded to their transferor courts for trial. In re: Genetically Modified Rice Litig., MDL No. 1811 (E.D. Mo., decided February 1, 2011). The litigation involves claims that conventional U.S. rice farmers sustained market losses when other countries learned that the U.S. rice supply had been contaminated with a genetically modified (GM) rice variety and then prohibited all U.S. imports. To date, the company has lost a number of bellwether trials and has entered settlements with some purportedly affected farmers. Relying on previous dispositive rulings, the court dismissed the Louisiana plaintiffs’ claims under the North Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act and their claims for punitive damages. The court allowed…
Northeast dairy farmers have reportedly settled their price-fixing claims against Dean Foods Co. for $30 million and injunctive relief requiring the company to buy a portion of its raw milk from multiple sources. Allen v. Dairy Farmers of America, No. __ (D. Vt., settlement reached December 24, 2010). While the agreement requires court approval, it would reportedly allow some 5,000 to 10,000 farmers to file claims for monetary damages over allegations that Dean Foods would buy milk only through Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) and its affiliates in the region. According to counsel for the plaintiffs, the case will continue against DFA, to resolve claims that “the nation’s largest cooperative monopolized a level of distribution of fluid milk in the Northeast and forced dairy farmers to join DFA or its marketing affiliate [Dairy Marketing Services] to survive.” See DairyLine.com, December 24, 2010; Worcester Business Journal, December 27, 2010; and Burlington…
Two Missouri residents with arthritis and allergies have filed a putative class action on behalf of Missouri, Illinois and Kansas consumers who were allegedly deceived by false health-related claims made by a company that sells elderberry juice. Delling v. Wyldewood Cellars, Inc., No. 10-02287 (E.D. Mo., filed December 6, 2010). The complaint also names a retailer as a defendant. The plaintiffs contend that they read an advertisement stating that elderberry juice “prevents colds, flu, viruses, asthma, allergies, diabetes, arthritis & more!” When they went to the store to further evaluate the product, they allegedly read customer and “physician” testimonials about the curative properties of elderberry juice and decided to purchase the product. According to the plaintiffs, they used the product “but failed to realize any health benefits and certainly did not see any abatement in their allergy or arthritis problems.” The plaintiffs allege one count of consumer fraud and seek…
A company that makes name- and store-brand food products, including cereals, granola products, pastas, and bakery goods, has sued the supplier of soybean food ingredients allegedly contaminated with Salmonella, seeking in excess of $7 million in damages. Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. v. Thumb Oilseed Producers’ Coop., No. 10-1898 (E.D. Mo., filed October 8, 2010). According to the complaint, the companies contracted for the purchase of the defendant’s soy grits under an agreement that guaranteed they would be suitable for human consumption and that the defendant would indemnify and pay damages to the plaintiff for any warranty breaches. Plaintiff Ralcorp Holdings alleges that it incorporated most of the soy grits into its products, specifically granola bars and trail mixes, for sale to a number of retail companies with which Ralcorp had also contracted. Before delivering the final products, Ralcorp claims that it discovered the soy grit ingredient “was, and had been at…
A multidistrict litigation (MDL) court in Missouri has issued a number of rulings on motions for summary judgment and to exclude or limit expert testimony in the bellwether cases involving Texas rice farmers who allege that contamination of the U.S. rice supply with genetically modified (GM) rice caused a precipitous decline in prices for their crops on world markets. In re Genetically Modified Rice Litig., MDL No. 1811 (E.D. Mo., decided October 4, 2010). The court’s pre-trial rulings are similar to its rulings in previous bellwether trials involving farmers in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Missouri. The court determined, among other matters, that (i) the Texas farmers could not sue for violation of a North Carolina statute; (ii) the economic loss doctrine did not bar the plaintiffs’ claims; (iii) the plaintiffs could pursue claims for private nuisance but not for public nuisance; (iv) the defendants cannot assert as a defense that…
Dr. David Egilman, who was excluded from testifying as an expert witness in the case of a person who claimed the fumes from microwave popcorn caused his lung disease, has reportedly filed a non-party appeal from the decision finding his testimony unreliable. More details about the case and the court ruling appear in Issue 356 of this Update. A federal district court determined in Newkirk v. ConAgra Foods, Inc. that Egilman lacked any scientifically sound basis for attempting to extrapolate workplace exposures to the diacetyl used in popcorn and other baked goods to exposures in the home. Workplace exposures, which have been extensively studied, have linked exposure to the butter-flavoring chemical to bronchiolitis obliterans, a debilitating lung condition often referred to as “popcorn lung.” Egilman, according to a news source, purportedly testified in 2005 in pharmaceutical litigation that he had earned between $2 million and $2.5 million over the previous…
A Missouri resident has filed a complaint in federal court against Kraft Foods Inc., alleging that it has been marking its Kool-Aid® and Country Time Lemonade® drink mix packages with the U.S. patent numbers for container patents that expired in April 2008. Brown v. Kraft Foods Inc., No. 10-1007 (E.D. Mo., filed June 1, 2010). Claiming that the marking violates 35 U.S.C. § 292, the plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, “a civil monetary fine of $500 per false marking offense,” costs, attorney’s fees, and interest. This litigation is one of a recent crop of false marking lawsuits to which the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals apparently opened the door when it ruled that the penalty could be imposed under the law on a per unit basis. Shook, Partner Peter Strand is focusing on false marking issues in his May and June IpQ newsletters. The May issue can be accessed here.
