The U.K. Royal Society has published 21 papers addressing concerns that climate change, water shortages and increased demand will disrupt the global food supply in coming decades. Titled Food Security: Feeding the World in 2050, the compendium challenges citizens, politicians and scientists “to increase food production, but to do so in a way that is sustainable, reducing our greenhouse gas emissions and preserving biodiversity.” To meet these objectives, the papers recommend several low-tech solutions, such as better storage facilities to reduce food waste, as well as novel technologies. The latter include (i) artificial meat “grown in a vat,” and (ii) increased use of nanotechnology, which paper author Philip K. Thornton said “is expected to become more important as a vehicle for delivering medication to livestock.” As Chief Scientific Advisor John Beddington urges in the volume’s preface, “The need for action is urgent given the time required for investment in research to…
Tag Archives nanotechnology
The European Commission’s (EC’s) Joint Research Centre has published a report that explores various definitions for the term “nanomaterial” currently in use around the world in an effort to devise a single definition that could make nanotechnology amenable to regulation. Titled “Considerations on a Definition of Nanomaterial for Regulatory Purposes,” the report observes that nanomaterials are currently being used in food and nutritional ingredients as well as food packaging. The authors call for a single definition of nanomaterial that will be “broadly applicable in EU legislation and policies, legally clear and unambiguous, enforceable through agreed measurement techniques and procedures, and in line with other approaches worldwide.” According to the report, no official definition for the term has yet been adopted in the United States, but the Environmental Protection Agency has proposed a definition for “engineered nanoscale material” under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced that its Science Board will hold a public meeting on August 16, 2010, in Bethesda, Maryland. Tasked with advising officials on “specific complex and technical issues, as well as emerging issues within the scientific community in industry and academia,” the board keeps pace with “technical and scientific evolutions in the fields of regulatory science.” At this meeting, it will hear a subcommittee’s final report on research at the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), as well as discuss the agency’s nanotechnology research program, among other agenda items. FDA has stated that it intends to make background material available on its website “no later than [two] business days before the meeting.” The agency will also accept written data submissions on or before August 9, 2010, and proposals for formal oral presentations on or before August 2, 2010. See Federal Register, June…
The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) has announced a July 9, 2010, webinar to provide an overview of the current draft of an Organization for Standardization (ISO) document titled “Guidance on the labeling of manufactured nano-objects and products containing manufactured nano-objects.” According to ANSI, “this nano-labeling document will likely have broad implications for a number of U.S. industry sectors, including food safety/industry, cosmetics and chemicals.” The draft ISO guidance document is expected to be distributed for a vote by June 18 to national advisory groups participating in the development of international nanotechnology standards. The ANSI-accredited technical advisory group (TAG) that represents U.S. positions before ISO is interested in comments on the draft to develop the U.S. position and vote. Internet reservations are required to participate in the webinar. ISO standards and technical materials, developed on an international level, often form the basis for national regulations. They are developed by stakeholders…
The EU Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) has reportedly rejected a draft provision that sought to allow products from cloned animals and their descendants on the European market. ENVI considered the proposal as part of its efforts to update and simplify regulations pertaining to foods that “have not been consumed to any significant degree in the EU before May 1997.” These novel foods include those that are “newly developed, such as food produced by new production processes like nanotechnology, but also foods traditionally consumed outside the EU.” Members of European Parliament apparently voted 42-2 “in favor of entirely excluding food derived from cloned animals and their offspring from the scope of this legislation.” Instead, they have asked the European Commission, which initially proposed regulating these products under the novel foods framework, “to present a separate legislative proposal to prohibit food derived from cloned animals and their…
With a new working definition of “nanomaterials,” the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is apparently poised to launch new regulatory policies including those addressing the registration of pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). The definition, revealed during a PowerPoint® presentation at an April 29, 2010, Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee meeting, is as follows: “An ingredient that contains particles that have been intentionally produced to have at least one dimension that measures between approximately 1 and 100 nanometers.” The pesticide registration policy, expected to be published in the Federal Register in June, would allow EPA to use section 6(a)(2) of FIFRA, which “requires pesticide product registrants to submit adverse effects information about their products,” to gather information about the use of nanoscale materials in pesticides. Registrants would be required to report the inclusion of nanoscale materials in a pesticide product already registered or pending registration. Under another new policy,…
The University of California-San Francisco Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment has developed draft policy recommendations to address potential health risks from nanomaterials and nanotechnology. When finalized, the document will be presented to California EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to better inform the agency’s risk assessment recommendations. The draft will be considered during a Science Advisory Panel meeting on May 5, 2010, and all public comments are due on that date. Among the recommendations for OEHHA in the draft report are to (i) assess whether nanomaterials are already covered under the agency’s existing policy structure, (ii) determine if nanosized materials are more toxic than “their bulk material,” (iii) identify the extent of nanomaterial use in products, including food contact materials and foods, and (iv) “require labeling for nanomaterials that contain known carcinogens or reproductive effects.”
The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology has released a report to the president and Congress assessing the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), “which coordinates Federal research and development activities involving the manipulation of matter at scales smaller than 100 billionths of [a] meter.” The third in a decade-long series of assessments, the report lauds the NNI for making the United States a nanotechnology leader but notes that aggressive competitors “such as China, South Korea, and the European Union,” pose a threat to that leadership position. The report makes a number of recommendations, including increased investment in product commercialization and technology transfer and a strengthened commitment to “explore in more orderly fashion environmental, health, and safety issues.” Noting the role that nanotechnology plays in consumer products, including foods, the report also envisions how it can be used in information technology, health care, the development of high-strength materials, energy and…
The U.K. Food Standards Agency (FSA) Board has reportedly agreed to maintain a confidential database of food industry research into nanotechnology, as well as a public registry of food and food packaging products that contain both approved nanomaterials and materials appearing to have nanoscale elements. “The way that we respond in terms of nanotechnology is a test case for the way we, as a regulator respond, to emerging and new technologies,” FSA Chief Scientist Andrew Wadge was quoted as saying. According to media sources, FSA accepted the recommendations put forth in a House of Lords Science and Technology Committee report, which called on regulators to develop risk assessment procedures and prioritize research into the safety of nanotechnology. In making its assessment, the committee had apparently favored mandatory industry participation, claiming that a lack of transparency had previously led to public distrust of genetically modified crops. Additional details about this report…
The European Parliament’s Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) has apparently issued a legislative report that recommends several changes to EU food labeling laws, but stops short of proposing a uniform “traffic light” system. After considering more than 800 amendments to draft legislation, ENVI approved “minor changes to existing rules on information that is compulsory on all labels, such as name, list of ingredients, ‘best before’ or ‘use by’ date, [and] specific conditions of use.” The committee agreed that all EU foodstuffs should list “key nutritional information” pertaining to energy and fat content, saturated fat, carbohydrates, sugar, salt, protein, fiber, and natural and artificial trans fats. It also favored country-of-origin labeling for “meat, poultry, dairy products, fresh fruit, vegetables, and other single-ingredient products as well as for meat, poultry and fish when used as an ingredient in processed food.” Other provisions backed by ENVI would require (i)…
