A New York federal court has allowed Lanham Act claims for the Stolichnaya trademark to proceed in a long-running case between a Russian state-chartered company and several international beverage companies. Fed. Treasury Enter. Sojuzplodoimport v. SPI Spirits Ltd., No. 14-712 (U.S. Dist. Ct., S.D.N.Y., order entered August 25, 2014). Federal Treasury Enterprise Sojuzplodoimport (FTE), owned by the Russian Federation, alleges that it owns the Stolichnaya trademarks, but SPI Spirits purports to be the private successor to the state-owned company that owned the trademarks before the Soviet Union dissolved and several public entities became private companies. The Second Circuit previously held that FTE lacked standing because it was neither an assign nor legal representative under the Lanham Act. Since that ruling, the Russian Federation assigned its rights to the Stolichnaya trademark to FTE, and the New York federal court has found that the assignment cures FTE’s previous lack of standing issue.…
Tag Archives New York
According to New York Southern District U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, a man who allegedly operated a wine counterfeiting laboratory from his California residence between 2004 and 2012 has been sentenced to 10 years in prison. Rudy Kurniawan apparently became a prominent and prolific U.S. dealer of rare and expensive wine that was actually lower-priced wine blended to mimic the taste and character of far better wines. He allegedly purchased empty bottles of rare and expensive wines—some of them from New York City restaurants—poured his mixtures into them, sealed the bottles, and then attached counterfeit labels that he created. The fakes were then sold to wealthy wine collectors through auctions and by direct sales. According to a news source, Kurniawan was eventually caught through misspellings and other packaging errors, including early 20th century dates on some bottles that pre-dated their actual production. Kurniawan also allegedly fraudulently obtained a $3-million loan from a…
Briefing has been completed before the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) on a petition seeking review of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling upholding California’s prohibition on the sale of food produced by force feeding birds to enlarge the liver beyond normal size. Association des Éleveur de Canards des d’Oies du Québec v. Harris, No. 13-1313 (U.S., distributed for Sept. 29, 2014, conference on July 16). Additional details about the Ninth Circuit’s ruling appear in Issue 497 of this Update. Joining the Canadian and New York foie gras producers that filed the certiorari petition are the attorneys general (AGs) of 13 states. Their amici curiae brief claims that the petition presents an issue of “exceptional importance to the preservation of state sovereignty,” namely, that the lower court’s decision “allows the states to engage in economic isolationism, set themselves against one another, and balkanize the nation, thus giving rise to trade wars…
The Beech-Nut Nutrition Co. has filed a complaint against an organic baby-food maker seeking a declaration that Beech-Nut has not infringed any of Plum PBC’s trademarks and that the trademarks Plum has asserted to the word “JUST” and certain phrases are invalid. Beech-Nut Nutrition Co. v. Plum PBC, No. 14-0791 (N.D.N.Y., filed June 30, 2014). According to the complaint, Plum sent Beech-Nut a cease-and-desist letter in June 2014 shortly after Beech-Nut launched a new line of whole fruit and vegetable foods for babies including the word “just” on product labels and advertised them under a promotional campaign “This is not baby food” and “This is real food for babies.” The letter allegedly demanded that Beech-Nut stop infringing Plum’s “JUST” trademark and using the promotional phrases. Beech-Nut contends that (i) the word “just” is simply descriptive and generic; (ii) Plum does not use the trademark symbol beside the word on its product…
A California federal court has dismissed with prejudice a putative class action alleging that Hain Celestial Group Inc. mislabels its vegetable juice products as “organic” and “raw” one day before a proposed class action was filed against the company in New York federal court alleging similar claims about its baby foods and home care products. Alamilla, et al. v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No. 13–5595 (N.D. Cal., order entered July 2, 2014); Segedie v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No. 14–5029 (S.D.N.Y., filed July 3, 2014). The California court dismissed the case based on two articles cited and incorporated into the complaint concluding that “pressurization has ‘little or no effects’ on nutritional and sensory quality aspects of foods,” which contradicted the plaintiffs’ argument that the treatment deprives the juice of nutritional value and that the company’s representations that it does not cook the juice are thus misleading. As a result of…
In a 4-2 ruling with one judge not participating, New York’s highest court has affirmed lower court rulings invalidating a New York City Board of Health rule that would have limited the size of the containers in which sugary drinks are sold in certain venues. In re N.Y. Statewide Coal. of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. NYC Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, No. 134 (N.Y. June 26, 2014). Details about the intermediate appellate court ruling appear in Issue 492 of this Update. Finding that the board lacks legislative authority, the majority weighed the separation-of-powers factors that are analyzed to determine whether a particular action is legislative or regulatory and determined that the board had overstepped its authority by engaging in political compromise, choosing between ends and making difficult and complex policy choices. It contrasted agency action regulating the purity of drinking water, the use of interior lead paint or the use…
A pair of plaintiffs has filed putative class actions against Chobani LLC and Fage Dairy Processing SA in New York federal court claiming that the yogurt producers deceptively marketed yogurt as healthy despite its high sugar content. Stoltz v. Chobani LLC, No. 1:14-cv-3827 (E.D.N.Y., filed June 19, 2014); Stoltz v. Fage Dairy Processing SA, No. 1:14-cv-3826 (E.D.N.Y., filed June 19, 2014). The nearly identical suits allege that Chobani and Fage used a label intended “to create consumer confusion by causing purchasers to impute any meaning to the 0 percent that consumers wish, such as that the products lack sugar, carbohydrates, calories or any other content which a consumer may believe is unhealthy,” according to the complaint against Fage. The complaints include pictures of the defendants’ products and pictures of competitors’ products to illustrate the industry standard of including what nutrition levels the “0 percent” refers to, such as fat or…
After Kangadis Food Inc. filed for bankruptcy claiming that putative class litigation challenging its alleged misleading olive oil representations has cost the company, which does business as The Gourmet Factory, more than $1.4 million in attorney’s fees and could cost an additional $750,000 if the claims go to trial, the named plaintiffs filed class claims against its owners in a New York federal court. Ebin v.Kangadis Family Mgmt. LLC, No. 14-1324 (S.D.N.Y., filed June 11, 2014). The heavily redacted complaint alleges that these individuals were directly involved in trying to pass off pomace oil, processed from olive oil residue, as “100% Pure Olive Oil” under the Capatriti brand. Details about the litigation appear in Issue 515 of this Update. One of the individuals named as a defendant in the new lawsuit—identified as Aristidis Kangadis—apparently evaded deposition when the company’s counsel argued to the court that he “is a 73 year…
The New York State Senate has passed legislation (S7217A) that would ban the sale of powdered alcohol, a concentrated alcoholic beverage deemed “unnecessary” and “dangerous” by the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Joseph Griffo (R-Rome). One such product, Lipsmark, LLC’s Palcohol®, was approved in April by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB), but the agency later reversed its approval, stating that it had been made in “error.” Lipsmark has reportedly resubmitted its application for approval. If the bill is passed by the New York State Assembly, powdered alcohol would be banned in the state even if TTB approves it to be marketed in the United States. “Should the [Food and Drug Administration] reverse its decision again and approve it, we should have a law in place to prohibit the sale of this product in New York. I hope the Assembly will join us in passing this legislation,” said Griffo.…
A New York state court has granted a motion for summary judgment and dismissed libel claims filed against Fox Television Stations Inc. by a D’Lites ice cream seller. Prince v. Fox Television Stations Inc., No. 107129/2011 (N.Y. S. Ct., order entered May 6, 2014). Matthew Prince filed a libel suit against Fox after a local channel in New York aired a report claiming that the low-calorie ice cream sold in the D’Lites stores Prince would soon be opening in the area contained more than three times as many calories, carbohydrates, total fat, and sugar than the amounts the chain advertised—for example, 148 calories rather than the advertised 50. The court rejected Fox’s argument that its report had not sufficiently identified Prince, despite that the reporters only visited stores that Prince did not own and the report briefly showed a screenshot of the D’Lites website listing what cities would soon have…
