An unopposed motion for preliminary approval of a class-action settlement has been filed in a federal court in New York to resolve the claims of those who allegedly purchased Salmonella-contaminated pet food that was subject to a nationwide recall and purportedly linked to infections in people and animals. Marciano v. Schell & Kampeter, Inc., No. 12-2708 (E.D.N.Y., motion filed January 28, 2014. If approved, the settlement would provide $2 million cash to three subclasses of claimants: those who purchased but never used the recalled products, those who purchased and used the products and “sustained economic damages as a result of injury or death to animals from their consumption of recalled products,“ and those who purchased the products subject to recall and fully used them “with no resultant ill effects.” Under the agreement, the defendants would also continue to use improved quality control procedures for three years. Issue 511
Tag Archives New York
Food activist and blogger Nancy Huehnergarth has reportedly filed a complaint with the New York attorney general (AG) over a purportedly deceptive “viral advertising campaign” from 2013 featuring a mobile game that promoted Gatorade® as a performance enhancer while denigrating water as “the enemy of performance.” According to a news source, gamers using the app navigated an avatar through an obstacle course and picked up bottles of Gatorade® to increase his speed while avoiding drops of water that slowed him down. Huehnergarth, who co-founded the New York State Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Alliance and was instrumental in getting “junk” food removed from school vending machines in her community, apparently filed the complaint because she believed the campaign provided an inaccurate message to children. “It’s preying on youth while slipping past parents who don’t necessarily police a mobile device quite as carefully as they do a computer. I think it’s…
A putative class of workers employed by Benihana Inc. in its New York City-based Haru Restaurants has filed an unopposed motion for preliminary approval of an agreement that would resolve claims that the company did not pay employees all the pay to which they were entitled and did not provide certain employees with valid tip credits. Lin v. Benihana Nat’l Corp., No. 10-1335 (S.D.N.Y., motion filed January 14, 2014). Under the agreement, the company would create a $600,000 settlement fund that would reimburse certain class members the full amount of their spread-of-hours premium and other members 80 percent of purported back pay due to an invalid tip credit. Under New York law, employees who work more than 10 hours during a work day are entitled to an extra hour of pay, referred to as spread-of-hours wages. Attorney’s fees and expenses would also be paid from the fund. Issue 510
According to news sources, San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman have entered an agreement to share documents and otherwise coordinate efforts in their ongoing investigations of Monster Beverage Corp., which, they allege, illegally markets highly caffeinated beverages to children. Herrera reportedly said, “Up until now, we have been working in parallel fashion, but now you will see greater cooperation. I have enormous respect for Attorney General Schneiderman and am glad to be working with his office in this major consumer protection issue.” Herrera further claimed that the company continues “to market its potentially dangerous products to children, despite the known risks it poses to young people. Hopefully, our efforts can lead to a reform of those practices.” The agreement was apparently struck about the same time that a court dismissed Monster Beverage’s attempt to stop Herrera’s investigation. Details about the ruling appear in…
A federal court in New York has certified a consumer-fraud class action against Kangadis Food Inc., d/b/a The Gourmet Factory, alleging that the company falsely labels its products as “100% Pure Olive Oil” when they actually contain the industrially processed substance “olive-pomace oil,” “olive-residue oil” or “Pomace.” Ebin v. Kangadis Food Inc. d/b/a The Gourmet Factory, No. 13-2311 (S.D.N.Y., order entered December 11, 2013). The court approved the named plaintiffs as class representatives and indicated that a memorandum stating the reasons for its ruling “will issue in due course.” Additional information about the lawsuit appears in Issue 492 of this Update. On the day the order issued, the court also filed a memorandum explaining its reasons for dismissing certain claims and allowing others to proceed in an order entered in July 2013. The court dismissed for insufficient pleading the plaintiffs’ New York breach of warranty claims, express and implied; breach…
The New York State Parent Teacher Association (PTA) has reportedly become the first PTA in the country to pass a resolution that calls on Congress and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration “to protect human health by prohibiting the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in food animal production.” Representing hundreds of thousands of parents, teachers and students who note that “antibiotic resistance has become a global public health crisis,” the group’s resolution supports legislation that would improve labeling on meat and poultry products and make antibiotic use on the farm more transparent. The resolution also (i) advocates public disclosure on the amount, type and purpose of antibiotic use during food animal production; (ii) encourages schools to serve meat and poultry from farms that use antibiotics only to treat disease; and (iii) supports education for parents and schools on how antibiotic use in livestock production contributes to antibiotic resistance. See Pew…
In a summary order, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of employee claims that Starbucks Corp. violated New York law by allowing shift supervisors to share store tip pools with baristas. Barenboim v. Starbucks Corp., No. 10-4912 (2d Cir., decided November 21, 2013). Details about the New York Court of Appeals ruling on which the Second Circuit relied appear in Issue 489 of this Update. The New York court rejected the baristas’ claims that state law barred “any employee with ‘even the slightest degree of supervisory responsibility’ from sharing tips.” Because it was “undisputed that Starbucks’s shift supervisors spend a majority of their time performing the same duties as baristas, and are primarily responsible for serving food and beverages to customers,” the Second Circuit found “no genuine dispute of material fact as to whether § 196-d permits shift supervisors to participate in Starbucks’s tip pools.”…
The grandmother of a 33-year-old who allegedly died from cardiac arrest after ingesting a Red Bull “energy drink” while playing basketball has filed a survival and wrongful death action against the company. Terry v. Red Bull N. Am., Inc., No. 506504/2013 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings Cty., filed October 24, 2013). The complaint recites a number of adverse incidents around the world since 2000 allegedly linked to consumption of the product and cites studies indicating that its use can produce symptoms associated with cardiovascular disease. Claiming that the product proximately caused the decedent’s death, the plaintiff alleges strict liability (design defect and failure to warn); negligence (design, manufacture and sale, and failure to warn); fraud; breach of implied warranties; punitive damages for the willful, wanton and malicious production of a beverage with “dangerous levels of caffeine and other stimulants”; and wrongful death. She seeks $5 million for each cause of action…
New York and California residents have filed a putative nationwide class action against Hain Celestial Group, Inc., alleging that its fruit and vegetable juice products, labeled as “Unpasteurized” and “100% Raw” are false and misleading because the products undergo high pressure processing, “which neutralizes the benefits of the live enzymes, probiotics, vitamins, proteins, and nutrients that would otherwise be retained in a raw and unpasteurized juice.” Stark v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No. 13-7246 (S.D.N.Y., filed October 15, 2013). The plaintiffs claim that they purchased a variety of these juices—“Red Juice,” “Gold Juice,” “Green Juice,” “Yellow Juice,” and “White Juice”—at a price premium, relying on representations that the products were, as labeled, able to deliver the nutritional benefits associated with a raw-food diet. According to the plaintiffs, raw juice products have, at best, a 5-day shelf-life, while the defendants’ products have a 30-day shelf-life, which is possible only with processing…
Keep Food Legal, a Washington, D.C.-based non-profit, has filed a petition under the New York Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), seeking an order compelling the office of New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg to respond to its allegedly unaddressed requests for “records and documents on various, proposed, or enjoined food-related regulations or policies to which the Mayor’s Office had some relationship, influence, or administrative role.” Keep Food Legal v. Office of the Mayor, No. ___ (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty., filed October 4, 2013). The petition outlines the requests that it made under FOIL since July 2012 and alleges that the city failed to respond within statutory deadlines. According to Keep Food Legal’s Website, the materials sought relate to “the development of New York City’s most restrictive food laws and regulations, including the city’s trans fat ban; mandatory menu labeling law; restaurant letter grade system; ban on providing food meant for…
