The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a final rule requiring animal and pet food labels to list “the common or usual names” of any certified color additives used in the products. Issued in response to the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990, the final rule brings animal food labeling in line with current human food regulations by adding “paragraph (k) to the animal food labeling regulations at § 501.22 (21 CFR 501.22).” The first part of paragraph (k) explains that any FDA-certified color additive used in animal foods “must be declared in the ingredient list” under the name listed in 21 CFR part 74 or 21 CFR part 82, although manufacturers are permitted to “parenthetically declare an appropriate alternative name of the certified color additive following its common or usual name.” In addition, the new rules require that the term “Lake” be included “in the declaration of…
Tag Archives pet food
The Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) has issued an October 24, 2011, memorandum calling for nationwide testing of pet food “to determine the prevalence of Salmonella” and remove contaminated samples from commerce. According to CVM, regulators are concerned about the transmission of “pathogenic and antibiotic-resistant bacteria to humans and other animals,” as well as the risk that Salmonella-tainted pet food, pet treats and supplements for pets could infect consumers in their homes, where products “are likely to be directly handled or ingested by humans.” CVM has directed investigators to collect and submit non-canned pet food, treats and supplements for analysis, which aims to identify “the serotype, genetic fingerprint, and antimicrobial susceptibilities of each Salmonella found in samples.” The agency will also use these samples for “research purposes” and “providing surveillance information on microbes other than Salmonella.” “Salmonella-contaminated pet foods, pet treats and supplements for pets…
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed, for the most part, with the resolution of multidistrict litigation claims against pet food manufacturers involving the melamine contamination and recall of their products in 2007. In re: Pet Food Prods. Liab. Litig., Nos. 08-4741 & 08-4779 (3d Cir., decided December 16, 2010). Further details about the settlement agreement appear in Issue 283 of this Update. The court determined that certification of a settlement class was appropriate and that most of the settlement’s terms were fair and reasonable. Because the district court agreed with the settlement’s cap of “purchase claims,” that is, “claims solely for reimbursement of the costs associated with the purchase of a Recalled Pet Food Product by a Settlement Class Member who has not been reimbursed for such costs to date,” without “the information necessary to evaluate the value and allocation of the Purchase Claims,” the appeals court vacated and…
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has solicited feedback on a proposed information collection related to the Pet Event Tracking Network (PETNet). PETNet would allow state and federal regulators “to quickly and effectively exchange information about outbreaks of illness in companion animals associated with pet food.” FDA has envisioned the voluntary system as a “secure, Internet-based network” that would provide a platform for members to receive and create alerts about pet food incidents. According to the agency, “The information will be used to help State and Federal regulators determine how best to use inspectional and other resources to either prevent or quickly limit the adverse events caused by adulterated pet food.” FDA has anticipated that each participating state would report via PETNet approximately 10 times per year. “[G]iven that the form only has 11 items and most are drop down fields, 20 minutes is a sufficient amount of time to…
New York University Professor Marion Nestle has announced the publication of Feed Your Pet Right, an extension of What to Eat that traces the evolution of commercial pet foods and recommends alternative diets. According to a May 10, 2010, Food Politics blog post, even those people without pets should pay attention to this $18 billion industry because “[p]ets eat the same food we do, just different parts… The safety issues are identical.” Written with Cornell University Professor Emeritus Malden Nesheim, the book turns a critical eye on the five major companies that produce pet food. The authors apparently explain “how pet foods are and are not regulated, how pet food companies influence government oversight and veterinary training and research, and how ethical considerations affect pet food research and product development.” In addition, they make recommendations for pet food owners, industry, government regulators, and veterinarians. Nestle also notes the similarities between…
A Nebraska-based manufacturer has voluntarily recalled a canine joint formula due to possible Salmonella contamination linked to hydrolyzed vegetable protein (HVP). According to the April 13, 2010, notice, Response Products has recalled a meat-flavored supplement for dogs because it contained components supplied by Basic Food Flavors, Inc., the company at the center of a nationwide HVP recall. Cetyl M™ for Dogs was “distributed in either a 120-count bottle (shipped between January 8, 2010 and April 2, 2010) or a 360-count bottle (shipped between February 11, 2010 and April 2, 2010).” While no lots have tested positive for Salmonella and no human or animal illnesses associated with use of the supplement, Response Products has warned that “People who handle dry pet food and/or treats can become infected with Salmonella, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with the chews or any surfaces exposed to these products.”
A U.S. magistrate judge has sentenced to three years of probation the couple who owned the company that imported melamine-tainted pet food ingredients into the United States from China. Sally Qing Miller, a Chinese national, and her husband, Stephen Miller, were also barred from importing pet food ingredients and were each ordered to pay a $5,000 fine. According to a press release, no further restitution was required “in light of a $24 million settlement in a related civil suit reached in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.” Their company, ChemNutra, Inc. was ordered to pay a $25,000 fine. The Food and Drug Administration has reportedly estimated that 1,950 cats and 2,200 dogs died after eating the contaminated food in 2007. Sally Miller was quoted as saying, “I’m really, really sorry this happened. I hope through this tragic, unfortunate event, the whole industry can learn from us, from…
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that pet food mislabeling claims should not be certified as a class action because the named plaintiff failed to satisfy the predominance requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). Kennedy v. Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc., No. 08-56378 (9th Cir., decided January 6, 2010) (not for publication). The plaintiff alleged that dog and cat food products labeled with “Made in the USA” were mislabeled because they contained ingredients from China and sought to certify a class of individuals from a number of states. While the court upheld the district court’s class certification ruling because the plaintiff failed to show which consumer protection law would apply to the class claims, it reversed the court’s order dismissing the action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. According to the court, the case, which had been removed from state to federal court, should have been returned…
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a proposed rule that would amend the agency’s animal-food regulations by requiring manufacturers to list the common or usual names of FDA-certified color additives on animal food labels, including animal feeds and pet foods. The amendment would make the regulations consistent with those that apply to human food and suggests how color additives not certified by FDA should be declared on the ingredient list of animal foods. According to FDA, the proposal responds to the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990, which modified the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by requiring food labels to list the common or usual names of all FDA-certified color additives. The 1990 amendments apply both to human and animal foods, but apparently regulations pertaining to animal foods have yet to be issued. Written comments will be accepted until February 22, 2010. See Federal Register, November…
Putative class claims have been filed in a California federal court against Old Mother Hubbard, Inc. and Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. alleging fraud in the sale of Wellness pet food. Barney v. Old Mother Hubbard, Inc., No. 09-06194 (C.D. Cal., filed August 25, 2009). According to a news source, the complaint contends that the pet food, which is more expensive than other brands, is advertised as containing only “human grade” meat, while it actually contains feathers, viscera, skin, and bones. The plaintiffs, who have invoked the court’s diversity jurisdiction, seek punitive damages and an injunction to stop ads which allegedly claim that the pet food ingredients are “of the same quality you would feed to your own family.” See Courthouse News Service, August 31, 2009.
