Tag Archives PHO

A California resident has filed a putative nationwide class action in federal court against Olé Mexican Foods, Inc., alleging that its Xtreme Wellness® whole-wheat tortillas contain partially hydrogenated vegetable oil, “banned in many parts of the world due to its artificial trans fat content,” thus belying the health and wellness representations the company uses on product labels. Guttmann v. Olé Mexican Foods, Inc., No. 14-4845 (N.D. Cal., filed October 31, 2014). The plaintiff alleges that artificial trans fat causes cardiovascular disease; Type 2 diabetes; breast, prostate and colorectal cancer; Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive decline; and damage to vital organs. He claims that he purchased one package each month for two years at a higher price than comparable products relying on package labeling stating “Healthy Life Style,” “Better Choice for Your Health,” “Whole Wheat,” and “High Source of Fiber and Protein.” According to the complaint, because the product contains trans fat, small amounts…

In consolidated actions pending since 2010, a federal court in California has entered a final order approving a class-action settlement that will require Quaker Oats Co. to remove partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs) from some of its oatmeal products and cease making the statement “contains a dietarily insignificant amount of trans fat” on any product label where the product still contains more than 0.2 grams of artificial trans fat per serving. In re Quaker Oats Labeling Litig., No. 10-0502 (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., San Jose Div., order entered July 29, 2014). Details about a court ruling trimming the plaintiffs’ claims that the company falsely advertised products with PHOs as healthy appear in Issue 433 of this Update. According to the court’s order awarding $760,000 to class counsel in attorney’s fees and costs, the suit and settlement conferred “a significant benefit . . . on the general public” given the product…

The International Chewing Gum Association (ICGA) recently submitted comments to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) about the agency’s proposal to revoke the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status for partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs). Noting that PHOs are used in some chewing gum products “as softeners or texturizers at levels typically in the range of 0.2 to 2 percent of the finished gum,” ICGA has criticized FDA’s tentative determination as “misguided and overly broad.” In particular, the association has argued that FDA’s blanket revocation violates “the legal and scientific elements of the GRAS standard, which require a safety assessment for intended use by experts in ingredient safety.” According to ICGA, the tentative determination not only represents “a significant departure” from past efforts to reduce trans fat consumption through labeling initiatives, but discards a previous determination that PHOs in amounts less than 0.5 grams per serving “are effectively not present”…

The National Association of Margarine Manufacturers (NAMM) and American Bakers Association (ABA) have submitted comments to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) rulemaking docket about the agency’s tentative determination to remove partially hydrogenated oils from the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) list. NAMM contends that “the great majority of margarine products no longer contain partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs), the source of trans fat, and that margarine is not a significant contributor of trans fats to the American diet.” In fact, NAMM suggested that margarine, with two-thirds less saturated fat than butter, 25 percent fewer calories than butter, no cholesterol (compared to 30 mg in butter), and no trans fat, is a healthier alternative. The ABA, meanwhile, commented that “bakers face unique challenges in removing remaining low levels of trans fat containing PHOs from certain bakery products.” It also found FDA’s tentative determination flawed, including its burdens of proof and…

A federal court in California has preliminarily approved the settlement of class claims that Quaker Oats violated consumer protection laws by labeling its snack bars and instant cereal products as “wholesome” with “0g Trans Fat” when they actually contain “unhealthy” ingredients, such as partially hydrogenated vegetable oils (PHOs). In re Quaker Oats Labeling Litig., No. 10-0502 (N.D. Cal., San Francisco Div., order entered February 12, 2014). Under the proposed settlement, Quaker Oats, which admits no wrongdoing, has agreed to remove PHOs from products that contain them by December 31, 2015, and will not reintroduce PHOs into these products for 10 years. The company has also agreed to not introduce PHOs into products such as Quaker Chewy bars or Instant Quaker Oatmeal products that do not contain them for 10 years, and, by December 31, 2014, will cease stating on product labels “contains a dietarily insignificant amount of trans fat” for…

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has extended until March 8, 2014, the period for submission of comments and scientific data pertaining to its preliminary determination that partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs), the primary dietary source of artificial trans fat in processed foods, are not “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) for use in food. FDA published a notice in the November 8 Federal Register announcing this determination and requesting comments on (i) possible alternative approaches; (ii) the time needed for reformulation; (iii) the burden on small businesses; and (iv) other technical challenges to removing PHOs from the food supply. Additional details about FDA’s opinion on trans fat appear in Issue 503 of this Update. See CFSAN Constituent Update, December 17, 2013.   Issue 508

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) “has tentatively determined that partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs), which are the primary dietary source of industrially produced trans fatty acids, or trans fat, are not generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for any use in food based on current scientific evidence establishing the health risks associated with the consumption of trans fat, and therefore that PHOs are food additives.” If the agency finalizes this determination, “food manufacturers would no longer be permitted to sell PHOs, either directly or as ingredients in another food product, without prior FDA approval for use as a food additive.” It would not, however, affect the trans fat that occurs naturally in small amounts in meat and dairy products. Announcing the initiative, FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg said, “The FDA’s action today is an important step toward protecting more Americans from the potential dangers of trans fat. Further reduction in the…

Four years after filing a citizen petition with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seeking a prohibition on the use of partially hydrogenated oils containing artificial trans fat in food for human consumption, 98-year-old University of Illinois Emeritus Professor of Comparative Biosciences Fred Kummerow has filed a lawsuit seeking an order compelling an agency response to his petition and a declaration that its failure to ban trans fats violates the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Kummerow v. Hamburg, No. 13-2180 (C.D. Ill.,  filed August 9, 2013). The complaint details the history of the ingredient’s invention and research, including the plaintiff’s own, demonstrating its “harmful effects,” including inhibition of an enzyme necessary to prevent blood clots in the arteries and veins. The plaintiff also distinguishes between artificial and natural trans fats, noting that he does not seek a ban on the latter. According to the complaint, Kummerow learned in 2004…

According to news sources, a New York woman is seeking $5 million in damages in a putative class action against General Mills, alleging that the company falsely promotes its Fruit Roll-Ups® and other fruit snacks as nutritious and healthy while failing to properly disclose to consumers that partially hydrogenated oil is a product ingredient. McClure v. General Mills, Inc., No. 10-05015 (S.D.N.Y., filed June 29, 2010). Plaintiff Payton McClure, who reportedly describes herself as a “lifelong consumer” of General Mills products, contends that partially hydrogenated oil is “dangerous” and “unhealthy.” She apparently seeks compensatory and punitive damages, among other remedies. See Reuters and NYDailyNews.com, June 29, 2010.

The attorneys for a woman who recently reportedly sued General Mills for failing to properly disclose that its fruit snack products contain partially hydrogenated oil also represent a man who has filed similar claims against the companies that make and sell Yoo-Hoo®, a chocolate beverage. Dahl v. Mott’s LLP, No. __ (E.D.N.Y., filed June 29, 2010). Information about the General Mills lawsuit appears elsewhere in this Update. According to plaintiff Timothy Dahl, the defendants promote Yoo-Hoo® as a nutritious and healthy product, claiming that it contains vitamins and minerals, has no preservatives and is 99 percent fat free and 99 percent caffeine free. The complaint states, “Unfortunately for consumers and, in certain cases their children, all these claims are false and misleading. Defendants’ healthful claims are misleading since the Product fails to properly disclose they contain a highly unhealthy, non-nutritious ingredient known as partially hydrogenated oil. This partially hydrogenated oil…

Close