A state court has denied a petition to overturn a New York City ban on the use of expanded polystyrene foam (EPS) containers, finding the city's determination “was a painstakingly studied decision and was in no way rendered arbitrarily or capriciously.” In re Application of Rest. Action All. v. City of New York, No. 100731/2015 (N.Y. Super. Ct., New York Cty., entered June 5, 2018). In 2015, the same court vacated and annulled findings by the city commissioner of sanitation in support of the ban because of “shortfalls” in the findings, remanding the matter for reconsideration. “This time,” the court said, “the Commissioner’s findings are based on reviews of petitioners’ evidence and on [the sanitation department’s] further studies and research.” Among the city’s findings, the court said, were (i) a 30-year history of “failure of subsidized markets of foam recyclers”; (ii) the lack of market for post-consumer recycled foam, particularly soiled…
Tag Archives recycling
New York City is reportedly considering a bill that would require curbside recycling of expanded polystyrene foam (EPS) containers. The city’s Sanitation Department is currently under a court mandate to develop a plan to collect and clean EPS containers. New York City previously attempted to ban EPS containers in 2013, but a court invalidated the prohibition after a challenge by several food companies, supermarkets and foodservice businesses. Additional details on the decision and the city’s appeal appear in Issues 579 and 583 of this Update. See Huffington Post, May 4, 2017; New York Post, May 7, 2017. Issue 634
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have released an August 10, 2016, joint report examining consumers’ perceptions of “recycled content” and “organic” claims, especially for non-agricultural products and services. Using data from Internet-based questionnaires completed by 8,016 respondents, the study sought to determine whether consumers view products marketed with such claims as having “particular environmental benefits or attributes.” Among other things, FTC and USDA asked consumers to assess the accuracy of recycled content and organic claims when applied to products made with varying types of recycled materials and varying proportions of “man-made” substances. While the agencies reported no significant difference among consumer perceptions of products that used either pre- or post-consumer recycled materials, “a significant minority of respondents disagreed that the organic claims accurately describe the product” when a small percentage of materials (i.e., “less than 1%; 1% to 5%; and 5% to 10%”) was…
New York City has appealed a trial court decision overturning a determination that expanded polystyrene foam (EPS) cannot be recycled, which had resulted in a municipal ban on the material. In re Restaurant Action Alliance, NYC, No. 100734 (N.Y. App. Ct., filed October 26, 2015). The appeal argues that the commissioner of the Department of Sanitation of New York conducted an extensive review over six months before reaching the determination that EPS could not feasibly be recycled and, thus, should be banned from commercial use within the city. “City Council prudently left determination of predictive questions about the future feasibility and sustainability of recycling foam waste to the judgement of the Commissioner,” the appeal argues. “[The trial court] was wrong to second guess the Commissioner’s determination based primarily on a short-term recycling plan proposed by the world’s largest foam manufacturer.” Additional information about the lower court’s ruling appears in Issue…
A New York state court has vacated a New York City prohibition on expanded polystyrene foam (EPS) after a challenge by several food companies, supermarkets and food-service businesses that used EPS in their food packaging. Dart Container Corp. v. De Blasio, No. 100734/15 (N.Y. Super. Ct., order entered September 21, 2015). The court provides a history of the municipal ban—more specifically, a statute dictating that EPS would be prohibited in favor of recyclable materials unless the commissioner of the Department of Sanitation of New York (DSNY) found it to be recyclable—which went into effect July 1, 2015, with penalties delayed until January 2016. Among the plaintiffs are Dart Container Corp., the largest EPS manufacturer, and Plastics Recycling Inc., an EPS recycler, which offered proposals that would designate EPS as recyclable and thereby permit it under the city statute. “The mandate to the Commissioner was to determine whether EPS should be designated…
California Assembly Member Mike Gatto (D-Glendale) has introduced a bill (A.B. 14) that would require the labeling of food grown using recycled or treated water from oil and gas field activities. “No one expects their lettuce to contain heavy chemicals from fracking wastewater,” Gatto said. “Studies show a high possibility that recycled oil field wastewater may still contain dangerous chemicals, even after treatment.” The proposed label would state: “Produced using recycled or treated oilfield wastewater.” See Press Release of Assembly Member Mike Gatto, August 17, 2015. Issue 576
The New York City (NYC) Council has reportedly adopted legislation that would prohibit the use of foam food containers by 2015, if city sanitation officials determine that recycling the substance is not feasible. Favored by outgoing Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the legislation referred to as the Styrofoam ban—would include a six-month grace period, during which only warnings would be issued, as well as a hardship exemption for nonprofits and small businesses that could request a one-year renewable waiver. Bloomberg thanked the city council for approving the measure, saying “This legislation not only eliminates a product that cannot be recycled in New York City, it is a giant step forward in the City’s effort to recycle organic waste. Foam pollutes the waste stream, making it harder to recycle food waste as well as metal, glass and plastic.” See NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg News Release and Law360, December 19, 2013. Issue 508
Spike, LLC, a company that makes and distributes energy drinks, has filed a lawsuit against the company it hired to destroy 18 pallets of products that Spike determined should be removed from the marketplace as unfit for sale, claiming that the recycling company failed to destroy the products and, in fact, sold them “thereby undercutting Spike’s sales.” Spike, LLC v. Nationwide Recycling, LLC, No. 12CV00111 (Wis. Cir. Ct., Waukesha Cty., filed January 10, 2012). Seeking compensatory and treble damages, attorney’s fees, and interest, the plaintiff alleges conspiracy; breach of contract; property loss through fraudulent misrepresentation; misrepresentation: intentional deceit; misrepresentation: strict responsibility; misrepresentation: negligence; and conversion. According to the complaint, Spike paid the company $10,000 to destroy 13,617 cases of energy drink products, which had a value of about $900,000.
