Yale University’s Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity has issued a November 2010 report claiming that “children as young as age 2 are seeing more fast food ads than ever before.” Titled Fast Food F.A.C.T.S.: Food Advertising to Children and Teens Score, the report purportedly evaluated “the marketing efforts of 12 of the nation’s largest fast food chains, and examined the calories, fat, sugar and sodium in more than 3,000 kids’ meal combinations and 2,781 menu items.” According to a concurrent press release, researchers relied on syndicated data from The Nielsen Company, comScore, Inc., and Arbitron Inc. to determine “that the fast food industry spent more than $4.2 billion on marketing and advertising in 2009, focusing extensively on television, the Internet, social media sites and mobile applications.” Among its key findings, the study claims that (i) “Unhealthy foods and beverages still dominate restaurant menus”; (ii) “The restaurant environment does not…
Tag Archives restaurant
KFC franchisees have reportedly made their closing arguments before a Delaware Chancery Court in a dispute over the company’s advertising policies. They contend that 1997 amendments to the company’s corporate documents gave them the authority to propose and approve different advertising recommendations. The lawsuit was apparently filed after KFC Corp. launched an advertising campaign for grilled chicken menu offerings, which the franchisees opposed for their potential to dilute the company’s fried chicken brand. According to a news source, the franchisees argued that while they can veto funding for advertising by majority vote, this power is illusory because KFC could institute delays, thus causing a blackout that would inflict significant damage on franchisees. The company apparently countered that the franchisees do have the right to make recommendations or modifications to the company’s advertising policy and have exercised that right on several occasions. Still, the company reportedly indicated that the franchisees cannot have…
A Florida man has sued a Houston’s restaurant and its manager for failing to train servers to explain to patrons how to eat grilled artichokes, contending that their negligence led to his hospitalization and exploratory bowel surgery. Carvajal v. Hillstone Restaurant Group, Inc., No. 10-57757 CA 03 (Fla. Cir. Ct., Miami Dade Cty., filed October 27, 2010). He alleges ordering a special item offered by a server, “which Plaintiff advised he had never seen or heard of previously.” According to the complaint, plaintiff Arturo Carvajal was not instructed that the outside portion of the leaf should not be eaten, although the restaurant “had a duty to use reasonable care with respect to the serving and explanation of items not described on the menu; which by their appearance as served appeared wholly consumable.” He is seeking damages in excess of $15,000.
The California Supreme Court has denied a petition for review filed by fast food restaurants seeking to overturn an intermediate appellate court ruling allowing further proceedings on claims that they violated Proposition 65 by selling grilled chicken products to consumers without appropriate warnings about carcinogens created by the cooking process. Physicians Comm. for Responsible Med. v. McDonald’s Corp., No. S186566 (Cal., decided October 27, 2010). The intermediate appellate court determined that federal law did not preempt the claims. Additional information about its ruling appears in Issue 360 of this Update.
A California court of appeals has denied the request of a former Chipotle employee to certify a class of current and former non-managerial employees alleging that the company violated labor laws by denying them meal and rest breaks. Hernandez v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., No. B216004 (Cal. Ct. App., 2d Dist., modified opinion filed October 28, 2010). The court agreed with the defendant that California law requires that employers provide, but not ensure, that employees take breaks. The court also found no error in the trial court’s denial of class certification because the court record showed that “Chipotle did not have a universal practice with regard to breaks.” Apparently, while the company paid for meal and rest breaks, some employees declared that they always missed meal breaks, some missed meal breaks but not rest breaks, some were not denied meal breaks, and others declared their breaks were delayed or interrupted…
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a district court’s dismissal of claims filed by a 76-year-old woman who alleged that she was seriously burned when trying to remove the lid from a cup of tea she purchased at Starbucks. Moltner v. Starbucks Coffee Co., No. 09-4943 (2d Cir., decided November 3, 2010). The court issued a non-precedential summary order to affirm the grant of defendant’s summary judgment motion. According to the court, the district court correctly excluded the testimony of plaintiff’s experts because they were unreliable under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 standards. In this regard, the court stated, “[w]ithout the testimony of her expert witnesses, Moltner’s claims fail because there is no way for a reasonable juror to determine, with respect to her defective design claim, whether the risks posed by the product’s design outweighed its utility, or, with respect to her negligence claim, whether Starbucks failed to…
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors has given preliminary approval to an ordinance (No. 101096) that would prohibit restaurants from offering toy giveaways in children’s meals deemed too high in calories, salt or fat. Approved by an 8-to-3 vote on November 2, 2010, the legislation reportedly has enough votes to override Mayor Gavin Newsom’s expected veto when the bill comes before the board for a final vote. If approved, the law would take effect in December 2011. Under the ordinance, restaurants would be prohibited from offering “incentive items” such as toys, trading cards or admission tickets in meals containing more than 600 calories and 640 milligrams of sodium, and if fat makes up more than 35 percent of the calories, except for fats contained in nuts, seeds, eggs, or low-fat cheese. It would also require meals to include a certain amount of fruits and vegetables. District 8 Supervisor Bevan Dufty…
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed two new information collections related to voluntary registration, recordkeeping and mandatory third-party disclosure under section 4205 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. Section 4205 requires chain restaurants with 20 or more locations, as well as operators of 20 or more vending machines, to disclose “certain nutritional information on certain food items offered for sale so that consumers can make more informed choices about the food they purchase.” In addition, it provides for restaurants or operators with fewer than 20 locations to biannually opt in to the federal requirements. The first proposed information collection pertains to FDA’s program for voluntary registration under section 4205. FDA anticipates that chains with 10 to 19 outlets “may choose to register, either because they are growing quickly, or because they are concerned about possible regulation.” According to FDA, “[t]he primary source of potential registrants will…
Employees at 10 Minneapolis-based Jimmy John’s sandwich shops have reportedly voted against joining the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), which has since alleged that the close election “was marred by misconduct.” According to The New York Times, “[U]nion supporters were predicting victory, noting that about 60 percent of the restaurants’ 200 workers had signed prounion cards asking the labor board to hold a unionization vote.” But when the National Labor Relations Board called the October 22, 2010, election, it reported that union backers fell short of a majority by three votes. With seven days to file objections, the Jimmy John’s Worker Union has charged MikLin Enterprise with 22 violations of the National Labor Relations Act, including bribery and intimidation. “We do not recognize these election results as legitimate and will continue to fight for our demands,” stated the group’s spokesperson in a press release. The vote was apparently IWW’s…
According to a news source, a Brazilian judge has ordered McDonald’s Corp. to pay one of its former franchise managers US$17,500 because he gained 65 pounds over the 12 years he worked for the company. He reportedly claimed that he was required to sample all of the restaurant’s foods everyday to ensure their quality, and he consumed the free lunches that were offered to company employees. The 32-year old man apparently convinced the court that he had to sample the food because McDonald’s hired people to make unannounced visits to its restaurants to guarantee that food, cleanliness and service standards were maintained. See Product Liability Law360, October 28, 2010.
