A 33-year-old man has filed a personal injury lawsuit in a Texas federal court against companies that made and sold the Four Loko® that allegedly caused the stroke he had in October 2010 immediately after consuming two cans of the caffeinated alcohol beverage. Villa v. Phusion Projects, LLC, No. __ (S.D. Texas, filed mid-July 2010). According to the complaint, the plaintiff continues to experience health problems, including slurred speech and lack of balance. Alleging negligence and products liability, the plaintiff seeks damages in excess of $75,000, punitive damages, attorney’s fees, and costs.
Tag Archives Texas
The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) has ordered a San Antonio produce plant to stop processing food and recall all products shipped since January 2010 because “laboratory tests of chopped celery from the plant indicated the presence of Listeria monocytogenes.” DSHS has prohibited Sangar Fresh Cut Produce from reopening without approval from the department, which issues such orders when conditions pose “an immediate and serious threat to human life or health,” according to an October 20, 2010, DSHS press release. After an eight-month investigation into a Listeriosis outbreak that included five deaths, DSHS allegedly linked Sangar’s chopped celery to six illnesses in people “with serious underlying health problems.” State inspectors also reportedly “found sanitation issues at the plant and believe the Listeria found in the chopped celery may have contaminated other food product there.” The recall primarily affects fresh produce sealed in packages and distributed “to restaurants and…
A fractured Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that claims alleging violation of the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 must be supported by proof of injury, or likelihood of injury, to competition. Wheeler v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., No. 07-40651 (5th Cir., decided December 15, 2009). The issue arose from a complaint filed by certain poultry “growers,” alleging under the Act that another grower “was given a contract [with defendant] on preferable terms.” The district court and a Fifth Circuit panel concluded that the Act did not require a showing of adverse effect on competition and allowed the claims to proceed. The appeals court, in a 9-7 decision, reversed, finding the district court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Four judges joined the majority opinion but authored a concurrence to more clearly discuss the statutory interpretation principles at issue in the case. The dissenting judges, relying on…
In an unpublished opinion, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the dismissal of a biscuit maker’s claim that the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) negligent testing of its product for Listeria monocytogenes resulted in a false positive report that caused it to lose its contract with a company that supplied 7-Eleven convenience stores with biscuit sandwiches. Lone Star Bakery, Inc. v. U.S., No. 09-50374 (5th Cir., decided November 17, 2009). The litigation arose under the Federal Tort Claims Act following a 2002 Listeria contamination incident for which the biscuit maker was initially blamed, but later cleared of any responsibility. The company sought $2.9 million in damages from the FDA. According to the court, which affirmed a grant of the FDA’s summary judgment motion, while the company submitted evidence showing “several instances where the FDA inspectors failed to follow agency collection and testing protocol,” its evidence was “devoid of…
The named plaintiff who brought a putative class action for false advertising of healthy menu items against a company that operates chain restaurants across the United States has reportedly agreed to dismiss with prejudice the claims she filed in a federal court in Texas. Paskett v. Brinker Int’l Inc., No. 08-942 (N.D. Tex., dismissed April 20, 2009). The plaintiff alleged that the healthy menu items at Chili’s Grill & Bar, Romano’s Macaroni Grill and On the Border Mexican Grill & Cantina restaurants actually contained higher levels of fat, calories and total carbohydrates than listed on the menus. The named plaintiff has filed similar claims in California against Applebee’s parent company, alleging that she dined at these restaurants because they offered a Weight Watchers menu, which was also purportedly advertised and marketed inaccurately. See LexisNexis® Mealey’s™ Litigation Report, Food Liability, May 2009.
A federal court in Missouri has determined that Texas plaintiffs alleging injury from the contamination of conventional rice crops with genetically modified (GM) rice had no reasonable basis to join non-diverse defendants and thus denied their motion to remand to state court. In re Genetically Modified Rice Litig., MDL No. 1811 (E.D. Mo., decided March 24, 2009). The 34 cases at issue were transferred from Texas to the Missouri court along with some 200 others from four other states as part of a multidistrict litigation proceeding. Rice farmers allege that the GM rice contamination adversely affected the global market for their products. The Texas plaintiffs sued the GM seed rice company and its affiliates, citizens of states other than Texas, and also sued a Texas rice grower and his affiliated companies alleging that he negligently grew the GM rice and contaminated neighboring fields or sold them GM seed rice. Plaintiffs…
