H.J. Heinz Co. has filed a lawsuit against Boulder Brands USA seeking to vacate and reverse a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) decision finding that the marks representing Heinz’s Weight Watchers Smart Ones® and Boulder’s Smart Balance® are sufficiently distinct, allowing both to exist. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Boulder Brands USA, Inc., No. 15-0681 (W.D. Penn., filed May 26, 2015). In its opposition to the Smart Balance® mark, Heinz asserted that the Smart Ones® mark was famous and would be diluted by Smart Balance®, but based on insufficient evidence TTAB disagreed in its March 2015 decision. In addition to the reversal, Heinz seeks a declaration of likelihood of confusion and a declaration of dilution under the Lanham Act and asks the court to direct the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to invalidate the Smart Balance® mark. Issue 566
Tag Archives trademark
The Federal Circuit has reversed and remanded a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) decision invalidating Snyder’s-Lance Inc.’s “Pretzel Crisp” trademark after Frito-Lay Inc. challenged the mark as generic. Princeton Vanguard, LLC v. Frito-Lay N. Am., Inc., No. 14-1517 (Fed. Cir., order entered May 15, 2015). TTAB’s decision found that “Pretzel Crisp” is a compound term and not a phrase, so it analyzed “pretzel” and “crisp” separately and found both words to be generic descriptors of Snyder-Lance’s pretzel-cracker product. The Federal Circuit disagreed with this method, holding that TTAB had conducted a “short-cut analysis” by not considering “Pretzel Crisp” as a whole phrase, because “the test for genericness is the same, regardless of whether the mark is a compound term or a phrase.” At the end of its decision, TTAB noted that “were we to analyze [‘Pretzel Crisp’] as a phrase, on this record, our conclusion would be the same, as…
Big Red, Inc., a beverage company owned by Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc., has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Catawissa Bottling Co., alleging that the company packages its Big Ben cream soda too similarly to Big Red’s red cream soda product. Big Red, Inc. v. Catawissa Bottling Co., Inc., No. 15-1423 (N.D. Tex., filed March 6, 2015). Big Red cites as distinctive its “consistent product packaging, which is unified by a central configuration: Two single syllable words, ‘BIG RED,” are featured prominently on the center of a label and positioned between stylized text or small accents. The label is then imposed on a clear, wide shouldered bottle with a tapered neck that angles smoothly towards the collar.” Big Ben “is artificially colored to an identical shade of red,” Big Red argues, and “is marketed in product packaging that is nearly identical.” Big Red alleges federal and state trademark and…
Texas has settled a trademark dispute with Alamo Beer Co. and Old 300 Brewing after the state intervened in Alamo Beer’s lawsuit alleging Old 300 infringed its trademarked Alamo silhouette. Alamo Beer Co. v. Old 300 Brewing, LLC, No. 14-285 (W.D. Tex., consent order entered April 28, 2015). According to court documents, the settlement establishes that Texas owns the premises of the Alamo in downtown San Antonio and “[a]s the owner, the State also owns the image of the Alamo and the right to commercialize that image to whatever extent the State, as owner, decides to do so. Such commercialization includes the right to use or license the use of the image on product labels.” The consent order further lists the state’s federally registered trademarks related to the Alamo, which it uses to sell products at the landmark’s gift shop. Under the final judgment, Alamo Beer and Old 300 are permanently…
Saeilo Enterprises Inc., and Alphonse Capone Enterprises Inc., have reportedly reached a settlement in a lawsuit alleging trademark and trade dress infringement for a bottle of vodka branded as “Tommy Guns Vodka” and shaped like Saeilo’s Thompson submachine gun. Saeilo Enterprises, Inc. v. Alphonse Capone Enterprises, Inc., No. 13-2306 (N.D. Ill., notification of docket entry filed April 21, 2015). The gun manufacturer alleged in its complaint that the vodka company misappropriated the trade dress and trademark of the Thompson gun with the shape of the bottle and the name, and Saeilo sought an injunction, damages and attorney’s fees. A notice filed with the court indicates that the parties have reached a settlement and will file a stipulation to dismiss, but terms of the settlement were unavailable. Issue 562
Food Network’s “Barefoot Contessa” and her company have reportedly reached a settlement agreement with Aqua Star (USA) Co. less than one month after the celebrity chef filed a complaint alleging trademark infringement for frozen dinners bearing the phrase “Contessa Chef Inspired.” Barefoot Contessa Pantry LLC v. Aqua Star (USA) Co., No. 15-1092 (U.S. Dist. Ct., S.D.N.Y., settlement reached March 12, 2015). Ina Garten and her company, Barefoot Contessa, alleged that Aqua Star and its subsidiary, OFI Imports, manufactured and sold frozen dinners too similar to products made by a former licensee of Garten’s name and likeness. Aqua Star has reportedly agreed to stop selling products with the Barefoot Contessa mark, remove and destroy the products from shelves by early May, and pay an undisclosed amount of money. Additional information about the complaint appears in Issue 556 of this Update. See SeafoodSource.com, March 13, 2015. Issue 559
Whole Oats Enterprises, a partnership of musicians Daryl Hall and John Oates, has filed a lawsuit against Early Bird Foods & Co. alleging that the name of the company’s “Haulin’ Oats” granola product infringes on their trademarks. Whole Oats Enters. v. Early Bird Foods & Co., No. 15-1124 (E.D.N.Y., filed March 4, 2015). The musicians own the registered trademark in “Daryl Hall and John Oates” and assert common law trademark rights to “Hall & Oates,” which the group often calls itself. Early Bird’s “Haulin’ Oats,” a granola product containing rolled oats and maple syrup, is an “obvious” “phonetic play” on the band name, the complaint alleges. The complaint also details a 2014 attempt at the use of “Haulin’ Oats” by a Tennessee company selling oatmeal and food-delivery services. The company assigned its rights to “Haulin’ Oats” to Whole Oats, which then licensed the name back to the company in exchange for royalties.…
Ina Garten, the chef who hosts Food Network’s “Barefoot Contessa,” and her company have filed a lawsuit against a seafood producer for allegedly infringing the Barefoot Contessa mark with its line of “Contessa Chef Inspired” frozen dinners. Barefoot Contessa Pantry LLC v. Aqua Star (USA) Co., No. 15-1092 (S.D.N.Y., filed February 17, 2015). Barefoot Contessa, the company that owns the trademarked name, agreed in 2012 to license the mark to unrelated entity Contessa Premium, a frozen- dinner manufacturer, on the condition that Garten and the company had strict control over the quality of the dinners produced and marketed under the Barefoot Contessa name. In April 2014, Contessa Premium sold its assets to OFI Imports, Inc. and its parent company, Aqua Star, according to the complaint. The day after the sale, Barefoot Contessa apparently terminated the license and refused to grant OFI a new license, “given OFI’s lack of experience in…
Red Bull GmbH has filed a notice of opposition to Old Ox Brewery’s federal trademark application, arguing that the brewery’s marks are likely to confuse consumers because both animals “fall within the same class of ‘bovine’ animals and are virtually indistinguishable to most consumers.” In re Application No. 86/269,626 and 86/269,577 (U.S. Pat. & Trademark Office, Trademark Trial & Appeal Board, notice of opposition filed January 28, 2015). Red Bull claims that the similarities between the marks would likely cause consumers to believe that the products are affiliated with each another. The Virginia brewery responded in an open letter on its website, calling the company a “Red Bully” that is “holding us hostage with a list of demands that, if agreed to, would severely limit our ability to use our brand. Demands like, never use the color red, silver or blue; never use red with any bovine term or image; and…
Let’s Buy British Imports (LBB Imports) has reportedly agreed to stop importing Cadbury chocolate made overseas pursuant to the settlement of a lawsuit in which Hershey Co. alleged that the importer violated the candy company’s trademarks and trade dress of Cadbury, Kit Kat® and other products by selling versions produced internationally. Hershey Co. v. LBB Imports LLC, No. 14-1655 (M.D. Penn., settlement date unknown). The settlement agreement apparently restricts the importation of all Cadbury chocolate as well as Kit Kat® bars, Toffee Crisps, York Peppermint Patties, and Maltesers®. Many consumers have responded negatively to the settlement terms; a campaign to boycott Hershey began on Twitter, and a MoveOn.org petition to protest Hershey’s trademark protection actions has garnered more than 25,000 signatures. The protesters reportedly argue that British Cadbury chocolate tastes better because of its ingredients—the British version of Cadbury’s Dairy Milk bar contains milk as its first ingredient while the American…
