The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a determination revoking the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status of partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs), “the primary dietary source of industrially-produced trans fatty acids.” To comply with the declaratory order, food and beverage companies must remove PHOs from products by June 18, 2018, or request food additive approval for specific uses of PHOs. Concluding that there is no longer expert consensus as to the safe use of artificial trans fat in human food, FDA argues that the action is “expected to reduce coronary heart disease and prevent thousands of fatal heart attacks every year.” In the wake of its November 2013 tentative decision, the agency apparently received more than 6,000 comments from individuals, industry and trade associations, consumer groups, and government officials, the majority of which purportedly supported the reduction of trans fat in the food supply. “Studies show that diet…
Tag Archives trans fat
A consumer has filed a putative class action against H.J. Heinz Co. alleging that the company’s frozen microwave French fries and tater tots contain partially hydrogenated oil (PHO), which contains artificial trans fat, despite packaging that indicates the products contain “0g trans fat.” Backus v. H.J. Heinz Co., No. 15-2738 (N.D. Cal., filed June 18, 2015). The complaint asserts that any intake of trans fat is unsafe and cites the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s June 16, 2015, final determination that PHOs are not generally recognized as safe for any human food. The complaint further argues that the artificial trans fats in PHO cause several medical conditions such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease. The plaintiff alleges violations of California unfair competition, false advertising and consumer legal remedies statutes and seeks class certification, damages, disgorgement of benefits, an injunction, and attorney’s fees. Issue 569
A California man has filed purported class actions against Nestlé USA Inc. and General Mills Inc. claiming that both companies use trans fat in their products—specifically, General Mills’ baking mixes and Nestlé’s coffee creamers—despite the availability of acceptable alternative ingredients without trans fat. Backus v. Gen. Mills Inc., No. 15-1964 (N.D. Cal., filed April 30, 2015); Backus v. Nestle USA Inc., No. 15-1963 (N.D. Cal., filed April 30, 2015). Each complaint details the history and structure of partially hydrogenated oil (PHO), the products’ source of artificial trans fat. Plaintiff Troy Backus argues that the scientific consensus on PHO advises that “consumers should keep their consumption of trans fat ‘as low as possible’” because it allegedly causes cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer and other medical conditions. He also cites regulations limiting trans fats in California, New York City, Denmark and other jurisdictions as evidence that the substance is “inherently dangerous.”…
Days after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a March 2015 letter warning Kind LLC against using the word “healthy” to describe several of its products, a consumer filed a class action against the company alleging negligent misrepresentation and violations of California consumer protection statutes. Kaufer v. Kind LLC, No. 15-2878 (C.D. Cal., filed April 17, 2015). The FDA Warning Letter listed the packaging of several products that an agency investigation apparently determined violated the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act because the products’ nutrient contents do not meet federal requirements to be described as “healthy.” The letter also warned Kind against the use of “+” or “plus” as well as “No Trans Fats.” The putative class action complaint cites the FDA letter, arguing that the “healthy,” “+” or “plus” and “no trans fats” claims mislead consumers into believing that they are purchasing a healthful product. The plaintiff…
University of California, San Diego, researchers have presented a study at the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2014, claiming that working-age men who consumed higher amounts of trans fat “had significantly reduced ability to recall words.” According to a November 18, 2014, press release, the study analyzed dietary data from 1,000 healthy men younger than age 45 and asked them to complete a word memory test. The results evidently showed that “each additional gram a day of trans fats consumed was associated with an estimated 0.76 fewer words correctly recalled.” Participants who consumed the most trans fat remembered 11 fewer words than adults who ate the least trans fat, a 10 percent reduction in words remembered. “Trans fats were most strongly linked to worse memory, in young and middle-aged men, during their working and career-building years,” the lead author was quoted as saying. “From a health standpoint, trans fat consumption…
A California resident has filed a putative nationwide class action in federal court against Olé Mexican Foods, Inc., alleging that its Xtreme Wellness® whole-wheat tortillas contain partially hydrogenated vegetable oil, “banned in many parts of the world due to its artificial trans fat content,” thus belying the health and wellness representations the company uses on product labels. Guttmann v. Olé Mexican Foods, Inc., No. 14-4845 (N.D. Cal., filed October 31, 2014). The plaintiff alleges that artificial trans fat causes cardiovascular disease; Type 2 diabetes; breast, prostate and colorectal cancer; Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive decline; and damage to vital organs. He claims that he purchased one package each month for two years at a higher price than comparable products relying on package labeling stating “Healthy Life Style,” “Better Choice for Your Health,” “Whole Wheat,” and “High Source of Fiber and Protein.” According to the complaint, because the product contains trans fat, small amounts…
In consolidated actions pending since 2010, a federal court in California has entered a final order approving a class-action settlement that will require Quaker Oats Co. to remove partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs) from some of its oatmeal products and cease making the statement “contains a dietarily insignificant amount of trans fat” on any product label where the product still contains more than 0.2 grams of artificial trans fat per serving. In re Quaker Oats Labeling Litig., No. 10-0502 (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., San Jose Div., order entered July 29, 2014). Details about a court ruling trimming the plaintiffs’ claims that the company falsely advertised products with PHOs as healthy appear in Issue 433 of this Update. According to the court’s order awarding $760,000 to class counsel in attorney’s fees and costs, the suit and settlement conferred “a significant benefit . . . on the general public” given the product…
A federal court in California has denied the motion to certify statewide monetary or injunctive relief classes in litigation alleging that J.M. Smucker’s labels for Uncrustables and Crisco Original and Butter Flavor Shortening products “mislead consumers into believing that they are healthful, when in reality they both contain trans fat and Uncrustables also contain high fructose corn syrup.” Caldera v. The J.M. Smucker Co., No. 12-4936 (C.D. Cal., decided April 15, 2014). As to monetary relief, the court dismissed the motion to certify with prejudice. The court agreed with the defendant that the plaintiff could not satisfy the predominance requirement as to her claims for monetary relief because she failed to identify any method of proving damages on a class-wide basis other than relying on the defendant’s California sales data. According to the court, this is insufficient to support a claim for restitution, because “this is not a case where class…
A federal court in California has dismissed the claims of one named plaintiff in a putative class action alleging that certain Costco Kirkland branded products are misbranded and deceptive, and narrowed the claims of the other named plaintiff. Thomas v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 1202908 (N.D. Cal., order entered March 31, 2014). The plaintiff whose claims were dismissed for lack of standing had alleged that the “0 grams trans fat” labeling on Kirkland Signature Kettle Chips was untruthful or misleading. The court agreed with the defendant that she had not cured the standing defects in her second amended complaint (SAC) and thus dismissed her claims with prejudice. Among other matters, she failed to (i) allege that the chips she purchased included any amount of trans fat or that she received a product different from the one as labeled, (ii) demonstrate that the label violated 21 C.F.R. § 101.13(h)(1), or (iii)…
American Law Reports (A.L.R.) has published an annotation titled “Liability of Food Manufacturer Based on Statement in Product Labeling or Promotion Relating to, or Inconsistent with Presence of, Trans Fat in Product.” 92 A.L.R.6th 141 (2014). It “collects and analyzes all the federal and state cases discussing the liability, when not precluded by federal preemption, of a food manufacturer based on an allegedly untrue or misleading statement, in the labeling or promotion of a food product, relating to the presence or absence of trans fat in the product or a statement that, while not referring itself to trans fat, is allegedly inconsistent with the presence of trans fat in the product.” Most of the nearly 30 cases were filed in federal district courts in the Ninth Circuit. Issue 517
