The Washington and Wisconsin legislatures have reportedly passed bills that would prohibit the use of bisphenol A (BPA) in baby bottles, sipping cups and other food and beverage containers intended for children younger than age 3. In light of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) recent decision to reassess the plasticizer’s safety, the Washington House of Representatives voted 95-1 in favor of legislation (H. 1180) that would prohibit BPA in bottles, cups or other containers designed primarily for this age group, as well as any sports water bottles, as of July 1, 2011. The bill now heads to the Senate, where the Health and Long-Term Care Committee has delivered a similar version to legislators. Meanwhile, the Wisconsin Senate has adopted its own BPA measure (S. 127), an identical version of which has already passed the Assembly Consumer Protection Committee and now awaits that chamber’s approval. In addition, Vermont lawmakers recently…
Tag Archives Washington
A federal court in Washington recently approved a class action settlement in a case filed against egg farmers who allegedly engaged in unfair, deceptive and improper conduct in the marketing and sale of omega-3 fortified eggs. Schneider v. Wilcox Farms, Inc., No. 07-01160 (W.D. Wash., filed January 12, 2009). As we reported in issue 226 of this Update, the complaint alleged that the eggs the defendant marketed and sold contained omega-3 fatty acids “without proven cardiovascular benefits” and charged a premium for them, while taking advantage of consumers’ limited knowledge about different kinds of omega-3 and “artificially inflating the perceived amount of beneficial omega-3 fatty acids” in their product. Without conceding liability, the defendants agreed to pay $2,500 to each of the two named plaintiffs and attorney’s fees of $160,000. The order dismisses the plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice and bars members of the settlement class, defined as “[a]ll persons who…
A rancher in eastern Washington has reportedly sued the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in federal court, seeking changes to its country-of-origin labeling (COOL) rules for beef products. According to a news source, Easterday Ranches claims that the regulations are adding to costs for the U.S. beef industry and consumers. Apparently, cattle born in other countries must be segregated from domestic animals and cannot be slaughtered on the same day; extensive records must be kept and buyers must keep the meat separate in processing plants. Easterday’s president reportedly claims that commercial buyers are paying far less per head for Canadian or Mexican cattle, and there is no premium price being paid for U.S. cattle. He also contends that the regulations do nothing for food safety and contradict the North American Free Trade Act. See Tri-City Herald and meatingplace.com, October 28, 2008.
