The Romanian government has reportedly proposed a tax on fast foods high in fat, sugar and salt. Backed by the European Public Health Alliance, the health ministry has sought to create the world’s most comprehensive tax scheme that would include, not just sugary foods and beverages, but savory fare as well. Proponents have claimed that the measure would help combat rising obesity rates in the Balkan nation while simultaneously raising £860 million for government coffers. But legislators have apparently struggled to define fast food as they consider more than 40,000 products eligible for the levy. They have already exempted popular street fare like pizza and kebabs on the ground that these items are often made from fresh ingredients, drawing further criticism from detractors who have questioned the proposal’s uneven application. In addition, the World Health Organization has noted that the plan penalizes vulnerable populations in a country where the average…
Category Archives Legislation, Regulations and Standards
The European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources has assessed “the safety of steviol glycosides, sweeteners extracted from plant leaves, and established an Acceptable Daily Intake [ADI] for their safe use.” According to EFSA, toxicological testing showed that the substances, such as stevioside and rebaudioside, “are not genotoxic, nor carcinogenic, or linked to any adverse effects on the reproductive human system or for the developing child.” The panel has set an ADI for steviol glycosides of 4mg per kg body weight per day, a level “consistent” with the joint recommendation of the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization. As the panel noted, however, “this ADI could be exceeded by both adults and children if these sweeteners are used at the maximum level proposed by the applicants” seeking authorization to market the sweetener. In light of this assessment, the European Commission must now…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) has requested nominations for five upcoming vacancies. The 15-member board is charged with developing and recommending a proposed National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances. NOSB is seeking two organic producers, two “consumer/public interest” individuals and a USDA-accredited certifying agent to serve five-year terms. Written nominations must be postmarked on or before July 17, 2010. See Federal Register, March 22, 2010.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) has issued a directive that revises its list of suitable ingredients that can used in the production of meat, poultry and egg products. FSIS will update the directive quarterly by issuing revisions as opposed to amendments. FSIS has added hypobromous acid and oat filler as suitable ingredients for certain processes. Hyporomous acid, which can kill the cells of many pathogens, may be used in water or ice under specific conditions to process meat and poultry products. Oat filler can be used in various meat products where binders are permitted and in whole muscle meat products “not to exceed 3.5 percent of the product formulation.” Oat filler must be listed as an “isolated oat product” or “modified oat product” in the ingredients statement and whole muscle meat products must be descriptively labeled.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) Office of Inspector General (IG) has released a report, which finds that the federal government’s “national residue program is not accomplishing its mission of monitoring the food supply for harmful residues” of veterinary drugs, pesticides and heavy metals. According to the report, federal agencies have failed to establish thresholds for “dangerous substances” such as copper or dioxin, an omission that “has resulted in meat with these substances being distributed in commerce.” The IG also found that USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), which is responsible for the national residue program, “does not attempt to recall meat, even when its tests have confirmed the presence of veterinary drugs.” Among other matters, the report calls for (i) better coordination among FSIS, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration; (ii) an expansion of the substances these agencies test for; (iii) improvements to the…
U.S. Representative Nydia Velázquez (D-N.Y.) is reportedly poised to introduce legislation authored by U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D N.Y.) that would provide $1 billion in loans and grants to help build nearly 2,100 grocery stores in areas around the nation that lack access to “fresh, nutritious” food. The Healthy Food Financing Initiative would reportedly create an estimated 200,000 new jobs nationally, including an estimated 26,000 in New York City. “Low-income communities face higher incidences of obesity and diabetes, and a big part of the problem is the lack of access to healthy foods,” Velázquez was quoted as saying. “This initiative is about empowering families to make healthier food choices so they live longer.” See Press Release of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, April 12, 2010.
Following a recent American Chemical Society (ACS) meeting at which scientists discussed how wines could be authenticated by measuring carbon isotopes, whose levels varied in the atmosphere during the years nuclear weapons were tested, a number of recent articles discuss the subject of food fraud. Said to affect some 5 to 7 percent of a range of foods from cheeses, fish, honey, and wine to expensive spices such as saffron, the problem has not apparently received the attention required from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), due to its focus on more pressing food safety concerns and contamination outbreaks. A consultant studying the matter for the Grocery Manufacturers Association was quoted as saying, “[Food fraud is] growing very rapidly, and there’s more of it than you might think.” Not only shoppers are fooled by mislabeled foods; major companies have been stung as well. Information about major food manufacturers and retailers…
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reopened the comment period for a proposed rule published August 4, 1993, that would amend the quality standard for bottled water. FDA is seeking further comment on finalizing the allowable level for the chemical di(2 ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in the bottled water quality standard. In a final rule published March 26, 1996, FDA deferred final action on DEHP’s proposed allowable level of 0.006 milligrams/liter (mg/L) in response to a comment which “maintained that finalizing the proposed allowable level for DEHP would result in a limit on the level of this chemical in bottled water that conflicts with this chemical’s permitted use under the existing food additive regulation for closures with sealing gaskets, and that taking such action would effectively ban the use of this plasticizer.” The comment further stated that “gaskets containing DEHP are permitted for use in packaging food and bottled water under…
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published its toxicological review of methanol in early 2010, and comments recently filed by food industry interests have criticized the agency for using “surrogate” chemicals, such as formaldehyde and aspartame, an artificial sweetener, to support listing methanol as a likely human carcinogen. They also challenge the agency’s reliance on controversial studies suggesting a link between aspartame and increased incidence of lymphoma and leukemia. EPA apparently used data involving the surrogate chemicals because they are related to methanol as metabolites. According to the Calorie Control Council, which represents companies that make low-calorie and reduced-fat foods, EPA’s review “reads like an aspartame report and not a methanol report.” Because aspartame’s safety has been studied for many years and the chemical additive has been approved for general use in more than 100 countries, the council argues that it should not be included in the methanol report. The Juice Products…
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently published an action plan to address concerns over bisphenol A (BPA), which has purportedly “caused reproductive and developmental effects in animal studies and may also affect the endocrine system.” Intended to strengthen the agency’s chemical management program, the plan focuses on the plasticizer’s environmental impact and proposes (i) adding BPA to the chemical concern list; (ii) gathering information on BPA concentrations in surface, ground and drinking water; (iii) requiring manufacturers to provide EPA with test data related to long-term effects on growth, reproduction and development in aquatic organisms and wildlife; (iv) using EPA’s Design for the Environment program to reduce unnecessary exposures and find acceptable substitutes; and (v) continuing to evaluate “the potential disproportionate impact on children and other sub-populations through exposure from non-food packaging uses.” In addition, EPA has pledged to work with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other federal entities to…
