A Florida consumer has filed a proposed class action against biscotti maker Nonni’s Foods LLC, alleging the company misleads consumers as to how much lemon the company’s limone-flavored biscotti contains. Goldstein v. Nonni’s Foods LLC, No. 22-81462 (S.D. Fla., filed September 21, 2022). The plaintiff's suit specifically targets representations on the product's label including “Limone (Lemon) Biscotti,” “Made with Real Sugar, Butter and Lemon Zest Oil,” “Real Ingredients” and “No Artificial Flavors.” She also notes images of lemon rind and peel on the product’s packaging. “The representations are false, deceptive, and misleading, because the Product contains a de minimis amount of lemon,” the plaintiff alleges. She asserts the company was required to provide a designation on the product's packaging that the product’s lemon taste is not from lemons, but from non-lemon sources, but failed to do so. The plaintiff’s claims include allegations of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, as well…
Category Archives 11th Circuit
Three consumers have filed a putative class action alleging Kombucha 221 B.C. sells kombucha that contains "more than twice the allowed alcohol" for a nonalcohol beverage. Brothers v. Mad at S.A.D. LLC, No. 21-60542 (S.D. Fla., filed March 9, 2021). The plaintiffs, who allege they purchased the kombucha for consumption at work, argue that the kombucha beverages "are sold to unsuspecting children, pregnant women, persons suffering with alcohol dependence issues, and a host of other people for whom alcoholic consumption may pose a grave and immediate safety risk." The complaint asserts that the nature of kombucha allows the product to continue fermenting, growing to a higher percentage of alcohol by volume by the time the product is consumed. "While Plaintiffs do not know whether BC Kombucha is below 0.5 alcohol by volume at the moment it leaves Defendant’s distribution center, what is clear is that the beverages are significantly above…
A consumer has filed a lawsuit alleging that Star Snacks Co.'s Imperial Nuts Energy Blend "is deceptively marketed as containing mostly almonds, pecans and walnuts when in actuality is composed of more peanuts than all the other contents combined." Andrews v. Star Snacks Co., No. 20-1357 (N.D. Ala., filed September 11, 2020). The plaintiff alleges she relied on the front-of-packaging displays, which list the contents as "Almonds, Pecans, Walnuts, Honey Roasted Peanuts, Honey Roasted Sesame Sticks" and show "the more desirable nuts (almonds, pecans and walnuts) arranged more prominently on the package to create a misleading impression of the package contents." The plaintiff alleges breach of contract, breach of warranty and violations of Alabama's Food and Drug Law.
A Florida federal court has dismissed a putative class action alleging that Burger King Corp. misled consumers with the release of its Impossible Whopper. Williams v. Burger King Corp., No. 19-24755 (S.D. Fla., entered July 20, 2020). The plaintiff, a vegan, argued that Burger King's marketing misled him into believing the Impossible Whopper, made with the plant-based Impossible Burger, would abide by vegan dietary restrictions, but the patty was cooked on the same grill as meat patties. The court disagreed, finding that "Burger King promised a non-meat patty and delivered with the 'Impossible Burger.'" "Plaintiffs’ argument, however, loses momentum when they claim there was a presumption the 'Impossible' patties would be cooked on a different grill than other items sold at Burger King," the court held. "This is not an essential term of the contract. Furthermore, as Burger King’s slogan has boasted for forty years, Plaintiffs’ could have 'Had it [their] way'…
A Florida federal court has dismissed a lawsuit alleging that Bacardi U.S.A.'s Bombay Sapphire contains a botanical classified as an adulterant in the state. Marrache v. Bacardi U.S.A., No. 19-23856 (S.D. Fla., entered January 28, 2020). "Numerous class actions have greatly benefited society, such as Brown v. Board of Education, In re Exxon Valdez, and In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation," the court's decision began. "This is not one of those class actions." The plaintiff "does not allege that the bottle of gin he bought containing grains of paradise caused him any health issues or other harm," the court noted. "He instead alleges that the product was 'worthless' because it was adulterated with grains of paradise." The court found that the 1868 Florida law prohibiting grains of paradise in alcohol was preempted by federal regulations finding that the botanical is generally regarded as safe. The plaintiff argued that the…
A plaintiff has filed a putative class action alleging that Burger King Corp. represented its Impossible Whopper in association with the Impossible Burger, which is "well known as a meat-free and vegan meat alternative," but cooked the Impossible Whoppers "on the same grills as its traditional meat products, thus covering the outside of the Impossible Whopper's meat-free patties with meat by-product." Williams v. Burger King Corp., No. 19-24755 (S.D. Fla., filed November 18, 2019). Burger King advertised the Impossible Whopper as "100% Whopper" and "0% Beef," leading the plaintiff, a vegan, to rely "on Defendant's deceptive representations about the Impossible Whopper and believing that the 'Impossible' vegan meat patty would be prepared in a manner that maintained its qualities as a vegan (meat-free) burger patty." The plaintiff alleges breach of contract, unjust enrichment and violation of Florida's consumer-protection statute and seeks class certification, damages and a declaration "that Defendant be…
Cape Florida Seafood has filed a lawsuit alleging that several companies have "conspired since at least 2015" to fix prices on farm-raised Norwegian salmon. Cape Fla. Seafood v. Mowi ASA, No. 19-22002 (S.D. Fla., Miami Div., filed May 17, 2019). The complaint asserts that salmon prices before 2015 were correlated with the cost of feed protein, while after 2015, "regression analyses indicate that . . . as fishmeal prices declined, farm-raised salmon prices increased." The plaintiff asserts that the regression analyses "are concrete evidence that farm-raised salmon prices were not increasing as a response to costs and, instead, were being affected by Defendants' combination, contract, and/or conspiracy." Cape Florida Seafood seeks class certification and damages for the alleged unlawful restraint of competition in violation of the Sherman Act.
Wendy's International Inc. has settled two class actions alleging injuries stemming from a 2016 payment-system breach. Jackson v. Wendy's Int'l Inc., No. 16-0210 (M.D. Fla., entered February 26, 2019); First Choice Fed. Credit Union v. Wendy's Co., No. 16-0506 (W.D. Penn., entered February 26, 2019). A Florida federal court approved a $3.4 million settlement between a consumer class and the company, including $1.1 million in attorney's fees. In Pennsylvania, a federal court granted preliminary approval to a settlement in a lawsuit brought by a class of financial institutions that reimbursed customers for fraudulent transactions. Wendy's will pay $50 million under the settlement agreement.
The Eleventh Circuit has reversed the dismissal of a lawsuit against Dunkin’ Donuts LLC, ruling that a blind plaintiff who alleged the company’s website was not compatible with screen-reading software showed a plausible claim for relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Haynes v. Dunkin’ Donuts LLC, No. 18-10373 (11th Cir., entered July 31, 2018). The Southern District of Florida previously dismissed the complaint, reasoning that the plaintiff had "failed to allege a nexus between the barriers to access that he faced on the website and his inability to access goods and services at Dunkin’ Donuts’ physical store." The appellate panel found that “the prohibition on discrimination is not limited to tangible barriers that disabled persons face but can extend to intangible barriers as well. ... It appears that the website is a service that facilitates the use of Dunkin’ Donuts’ shops, which are places of public accommodation. And…
A woman has filed a lawsuit alleging she was hospitalized after eating Salmonella-contaminated eggs from Rose Acre Farms Inc. Roberts v. Rose Acre Farms, Inc., No. 18-61082 (S.D. Fla., filed May 14, 2018). The plaintiff alleges that she purchased eggs packaged by Coburn Farms, a Sav-A-Lot Food Stores brand, and became ill enough to require two hospitalizations. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has linked Rose Acre Farms eggs to a nine-state outbreak of Salmonella infections. Claiming strict product liability, breach of warranty, negligence and negligence per se, the plaintiff seeks damages and attorney’s fees.
