A California federal court has certified a class of California consumers who allege that Blue Diamond Growers’ almond milk is mislabeled as “All Natural” and hides its added sugar content by listing “evaporated cane juice” (ECJ) on its label instead. Werdebaugh v. Blue Diamond Growers, No. 5:12-cv-2724 (N.D. Cal., order entered May 23, 2014). The court granted plaintiff Chris Werdebaugh’s motion for certification of the California class but rejected his request for nationwide certification because he had not shown that California had any interest that outweighed the interests of other states in determining their own policies. Werdebaugh argued that the “All Natural” label on Blue Diamond’s almond milk is misleading because the product contains chemical preservatives, synthetic chemicals and added artificial color, and the label also lists ECJ as an ingredient when sugar is the common name as required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The court ruled…
Category Archives U.S. Circuit Courts
A federal court in California has granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss in a putative class action alleging that Whole Foods Market Group misleads consumers by labeling certain food products containing sodium acid pyrophosphate (SAPP) as “All Natural.” Garrison v. Whole Foods Mkt. Group, Inc., No. 13-5222 (N.D. Cal., order entered June 2, 2014). Additional information about the complaint appears in Issue 504 of this Update. The court ruled that (i) the claims were not preempted under federal law; (ii) the primary jurisdiction doctrine did not apply (given the lack of a clear indication that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration intended to revisit its decision not to adopt formal regulations as to the meaning of “natural”); (iii) the plaintiffs sufficiently pleaded a cause of action (with the exception of allegations pertaining to marketing in various media and advertising—these claims were dismissed with leave to amend);…
A federal court in California has certified a nationwide class of consumers as to the injunctive relief requested in litigation against Dole Packaged Foods regarding its labeling claims that certain fruit products are “All Natural” despite the presence of ascorbic acid and citric acid, but limited the damages class to California consumers and the number of products at issue. Brazil v. Dole Packaged Foods, LLC, No. 12-1831 (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., San Jose Div., order entered may 30, 2014). Dismissed with prejudice were Dole products and label statements in the second amended complaint for which the named plaintiff did not move for class certification. An earlier ruling narrowing the claims is discussed in Issue 498 of this Update. Among other matters, the court disagreed with Dole’s argument that the class could not be ascertained because company records identifying purchasers or the products they purchased do not exist and further…
A California federal court has dismissed a putative class action against Diamond Foods Inc. alleging that its Kettle tortilla chips are mislabeled as “All Natural” despite containing synthetic ingredients. Surzyn v. Diamond Foods Inc., No. 14-cv-136 (N.D. Cal., order entered May 28, 2014). Citing a lack of basic factual assertions such as which product was the subject of the lawsuit, the court granted plaintiff Dominika Surzyn leave to amend within 21 days. Diamond Foods argued that its “All Natural” label is not misleading within the context of the rest of the packaging, which lists some of the ingredients—maltodextrin and dextrose—at issue in the case, and cited a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) determination that consumers’ understanding of “natural” is context-specific. The court rejected Diamond Foods’ assertions, finding that FTC had reached its conclusion not to dismiss any meaning and implication of the world “natural” but to decline to offer guidance on the…
A multidistrict litigation (MDL) court in Ohio has dismissed with prejudice six putative class actions involving plaintiffs from California, Colorado, Florida, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas, alleging that Anheuser-Busch “routinely and intentionally adds extra water to its finished product to produce malt beverages that ‘consistently have significantly lower alcohol content than the percentages displayed on its labels.’” In re Anheuser-Busch Beer Labeling, Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig., MDL No. 13-2448 (N.D. Ohio, order entered June 2, 2014). Additional details about the litigation and the order consolidating the cases appear in issues 473 and 487 of this Update. Federal regulations allow malt beverages containing 0.5 percent or more alcohol by volume a tolerance of 0.3 percent in the alcohol content, “either above or below the stated percentage of alcohol,” and the affected jurisdictions have adopted or refer to these regulations in their statutes and regulations. The defendant argued in its motion…
Stewart Parnell, former president of the Peanut Corp. of America (PCA), linked to a 2008-2009 nationwide Salmonella outbreak that allegedly killed nine who consumed products made with the company’s tainted peanut paste and injured some 700 others, has filed a motion asking the court to exclude “all evidence related to any alleged illness or death” during his criminal trial. United States v. Parnell, No. 13-cr 12 (M.D. Ga., motion filed May 20, 2014). Observing that the government’s pleaded harm “consists of monetary harm to the customers and individuals named” and that the entire case is “premised on the alleged wrongful conduct of obtaining money by false pretenses,” Parnell argues that victim-impact evidence is irrelevant and would be highly prejudicial. In this regard, he states, “[T]he only purpose for introducing evidence of salmonella-related illness and death is to inflame the jury in an effort to suggest a decision on an improper basis.”…
Federal prosecutors have reportedly filed criminal charges against Iowa-based Quality Egg LLC and two former company executives—Austin “Jack” DeCoster and his son Peter—over a 2010 Salmonella outbreak that sickened thousands across the country and resulted in the recall of some 550 million eggs. United States v. Quality Egg, LLC, No. 14-cr-3024 (N.D. Iowa, filed May 21, 2014). The charging document, which brings two felony counts of introducing adulterated food into interstate commerce against the company and related misdemeanor charges against the DeCosters, alleges that the company sold tainted eggs from early 2010 until the August recall. According to news sources, the DeCosters are expected to enter guilty pleas on June 3, 2014, as part of a plea agreement that ends the four-year investigation. The charging document alleges that the company sold products with labels making “the eggs appear to be not as old as they actually were” from 2006 to 2010,…
Ice cream truck franchiser Mister Softee Inc. has filed a motion for a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit alleging trademark infringement and violation of a non-compete covenant against former franchisee Dimitrios Tsirkos, who converted his 16 Mister Softee trucks to Master Softee trucks and began selling his own ice cream out of them at the beginning of the 2014 ice cream truck season. Mister Softee of Queens Inc. v. Tsirkos, No. 14-1975 (S.D.N.Y., motion filed April 25, 2014). Mister Softee ended Tsirkos’ franchise contract after he refused to pay $74,000 in franchise royalties for his trucks, but Tsirkos allegedly adjusted the logo on his trucks, started his own soft-serve depot and began selling ice cream in New York City anyway. Tsirkos has filed a motion opposing the injunction, and a hearing is set for May 15, 2014. See Law360, May 2, 2014. See New York Daily News, May 1, 2014. …
Two consumers have filed a putative class action against dairy cooperative Darigold Inc., a subsidiary of Northwest Dairy Association, for false advertising and fraud by concealment, alleging that the company misrepresented the conditions in which its milk is produced. Ruiz v. Darigold Inc., No. 14-2054 (N.D. Cal., May 5, 2014). Yesenia Ruiz and Fernando Dorantes argue that they would not have purchased Darigold’s products if they had known about the purportedly poor conditions in which its employees work and its cows are milked. According to the complaint, Darigold employees are denied drinkable water, break periods and lunch rooms, and some of its cows are sick and injured but are milked anyway. The plaintiffs also assert claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law; the unjust enrichment laws of California, Washington and Oregon; Washington’s Consumer Protection Act; and Oregon’s Unlawful Trade Practices Act. Issue 523
Kashi Co. and its unit Bear Naked Inc. have both settled class actions stemming from their claims that their products are “All Natural” and include “Nothing Artificial.” Astiana v. Kashi Co., No. 11-1967 (S.D. Cal., settlement filed May 2, 2014). Thurston v. Bear Naked Inc., No. 11-2890 (S.D. Cal., settlement filed May 2, 2014). The plaintiffs alleged in California federal court that the companies, both part of Kellogg Co., advertised their products as all natural and charged higher prices based on that quality while inserting synthetic material into their foods. A judge certified both classes in July 2013 after ruling that the plaintiffs had proved the artificiality of some of the “natural” ingredients, including hexane-processed soy ingredients and pyridoxine hydrochloride. Kashi has agreed to pay $5 million to California consumers who purchased its products and to alter its labeling and advertising to remove the claims at issue; in a similar…
