The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has issued a paper claiming that a state tax on sugar-sweetened beverages “would yield billions of dollars in new revenue and counter the alarming risks of obesity, poor nutrition, and displacement of more healthful foods and beverages.” Echoing similar proposals published in the New England Journal of Medicine and by the Institute of Medicine, the CSPI report calls for “a modest new (or extra) tax of five cents per 12-ounce serving” that would nationally raise state revenues by “more than $7 billion annually, ranging from about $13 million in Wyoming to about $878 million in California.” The paper also includes a chart detailing “‘nickel-a-drink’ state revenue projections, based on national consumption data and pro rated for each state’s population.” “President Obama is exactly right when he says kids are drinking too much soda,” stated CSPI Executive Director Michael Jacobson in a September…
Category Archives Other Developments
The British Medical Association (BMA) has issued a September 2009 report titled Under the Influence: The Damaging Effect of Alcohol Marketing on Young People, which aims “to identify effective ways of protecting young people from the influence of alcohol promotion and marketing.” Led by Institute for Social Marketing Director Gerald Hastings, the report purportedly “confirms that alcohol marketing is independently linked to the onset of drinking in young people and the amount they drink,” according to an accompanying article published in the September 12, 2009, edition of the British Medical Journal. The report also apparently criticizes regulators for allowing the UK alcohol industry, which allegedly spends approximately £800 million per year on advertising, to fund the public education program known as Drinkaware Trust. The BMA Science Board has urged UK policy makers to counter these “ineffective educational initiatives and partial solutions” by adopting several measures, including a comprehensive ban on all alcohol…
A new anti-obesity ad unveiled by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene depicts globs of human fat gushing from a soda bottle and asks the question: “Are you pouring on the pounds? Don’t drink yourself fat.” The ad urges viewers to choose water, seltzer or low-fat milk instead of high-calorie sodas and juice drinks. The $277,000 ad, which will run in 1,500 subways subway cars for three months, was apparently denounced by the American Beverage Association as “counterproductive to serious efforts to address a complex issues such as obesity.” ABA spokesperson Kevin Keane said the ad campaign is “over the top and unfortunately is going to undermine meaningful efforts to educate people about how to maintain a healthy weight by balancing calories consumed from all foods and beverages with calories burned through exercise.” But Cathy Nonas, a dietitian for the city’s health and mental hygiene department,…
The cover story from the latest Chemical & Engineering News details the challenges faced by food and drug makers to keep chemical leaching from product packaging and processing to a minimum. According to the article, even the most inert substances used in food packaging, such as glass, can leach chemicals because they are typically capped with metal, rubber or plastic. For example, carbon black and nitrosamines, both carcinogens, have been used to process rubber and have been found leaching from asthma inhalers and baby-bottle nipples. Bisphenol A and the chemicals in the inks used on labels are also discussed; apparently, even plastic barriers cannot stop ink migration. The article notes, “Speak with anyone who produces, studies, or regulates packaging, and you will hear this point repeated: It is not a question of whether packaging components will leach into a product, it’s a question of how much.” Complicating the issue are…
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has published a report titled Local Government Actions to Prevent Childhood Obesity, which advises cities, counties and townships to adopt a variety of health measures likely to directly affect children outside the regular school day. According to IOM, “16.3 percent of children and adolescents between the ages of two and 19 are obese” and “more likely than their lower-weight counterparts to develop hypertension, high cholesterol, and type 2 diabetes when they are young.” The report identifies nine healthy eating strategies focused on improving community and individual access to “healthy, safe and affordable foods”; reducing access to “calorie-dense, nutrient-poor foods”; and raising awareness about childhood obesity prevention. In addition, IOM offers six strategies designed to encourage physical activity, reduce sedentary behavior and stress the importance of sustained exercise. To further these goals, the report urges local policymakers to consider a number of action steps, including: (i) menu labeling…
Jointly sponsored by the Consumer Federation of America and the Grocery Manufacturers Association, the 32nd annual National Food Policy Conference will feature keynote addresses by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Margaret Hamburg. Scheduled for September 8-9, 2009, in Washington, D.C., the conference will convene speakers representing industry, government, academia, and consumer interest organizations to address food safety and child nutrition, “two issues that have become critical concerns in recent months both domestically and internationally.” Among the scheduled speakers are Margo Wootan, Director of Nutrition Policy for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, and representatives of organic associations, Trust for America’s Health, the National Wildlife Federation, American Academy of Pediatrics, Consumers Union, the U.S. Trade Representative’s office, Food & Water Watch, American Council for Fitness & Nutrition, and The Pew Charitable Trusts. They will discuss pending federal legislation, improving children’s health with better nutrition,…
According to a researcher with a non-profit think tank that focuses on curbing “globalization,” the Codex Alimentarius Commission is controlled by corporate interests and thus poses a threat to consumer health and fair trade practices in the food market. According to Stephen Lendman of the Montreal-based Centre for Research on Globalization, genetically modified (GMO) foods and drugs will proliferate under the commission’s standards and guidelines, labeling will be banned and industry will determine “what will and won’t be sold.” The article explains how the commission is organized and operates and argues that World Trade Organization member nations are legally bound to adopt the commission’s standards to the detriment of consumer choice and health. Lendman contends that Codex standards will become “globally mandated” at the end of 2009 in the absence of any legal challenges. According to Lendman, this means that “[c]ommon foods, herbs, nutrients, amino acids, homeopathic and other natural remedies…
The American Heart Association (AHA) has issued guidelines on limiting the consumption of added sugars, claiming that most American women should consume no more than 100 calories (six teaspoons) of added sugars per day and men no more than 150 calories (nine teaspoons). Citing a report from the 2001-04 National Health and Nutrition Examination survey, AHA notes that the average intake of added sugars for all Americans was 22.2 teaspoons per day. The AHA guidelines provide information about “the relationship between excess sugar intake and metabolic abnormalities, adverse health conditions and shortfalls in essential nutrients.” “Sugar has no nutritional value other than to provide calories,” said lead author and nutrition professor Rachel Johnson in an AHA press release. “Consuming foods and beverages with excessive amounts of added sugars displaces more nutritious foods and beverages for many people.” Johnson purports that sugars added to foods during processing or preparation are linked…
The American Veterinary Medicine Association (AVMA) has submitted a report to Congress that challenges the 2008 findings of the Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production, which supports legislation (H.R. 1549 and S. 619) seeking to prohibit or limit the use of low-level antibiotics in agriculture. Signed by 20 food producer organizations, an introductory letter states that the Pew Commission and other supporters of the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act (PAMTA) “offer no new information or data to make their case, but rather echo inaccurate messages.” The signatories have called on the Obama administration to honor its pledge to base its regulatory decisions on “the best available science,” not the opinions of “PhD issue advocates or animal rights activists.” AVMA specifically faults the Pew Commission for failing to “incorporate the findings and suggestions of a significant number of participating academicians.” Focusing on the areas of antimicrobial resistance, the environment…
The Chicago Tribune has released the results of a preliminary 2008 U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) study that purportedly found “more than 50 pesticide compounds . . . on domestic and imported peaches headed for U.S. stores.” According to the August 12, 2009, article, “Five of the compounds exceeded the limits set by the Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], and six of the pesticides present are not approved for use on peaches in the United States.” USDA reportedly sampled washed conventional peaches from more than 700 sites, including Chile, South Carolina and Georgia, as part of its Pesticide Data Program, which does not enforce violations but uses them to identify problematic practices. “Although most pesticides in peaches were at levels well below EPA tolerances,” states the Tribune, “some scientists and activists remain concerned about even low-level exposure, especially to [sic] pregnant women and children.” The newspaper also commissioned its own test…
