The European Commission (EC) has published a report titled “Origin labelling
for meat used as an ingredient: consumers’ attitude, feasibility of possible
scenarios and impacts” that provides an overview of the potential consequences
of mandatory origin labeling of meat used as an ingredient in food.

Based on an independent study completed in July 2013, the report explores three scenarios: (i) maintaining current voluntary origin labeling; (ii) introducing mandatory labeling for EU/non-EU or EU/specific third country indication; and (iii) introducing mandatory labeling indicating the specific EU member state or the specific third country.

Among other things, the findings revealed that (i) overall there is “strong”
consumer interest in origin labeling; (ii) a considerable difference exists
among European Union (EU) member states on consumer preferences and
understanding of origin information as well as on the levels of motivation and
reasons for wishing to have such information; and (iii) consumer interest for
origin labeling ranks behind price and quality in terms of the most important
factors affecting consumer choice. Evidently, strong consumer interest in
origin labeling is not reflected in consumers’ willingness to pay additional
costs. At price increases of less than 10 percent, consumer willingness to pay
fell by 60 to 80 percent.

The Commission plans to determine next steps after discussions with EU
member states and the European Parliament. See European Commission News
Release, December 17, 2013.

 

Issue 508

About The Author

For decades, manufacturers, distributors and retailers at every link in the food chain have come to Shook, Hardy & Bacon to partner with a legal team that understands the issues they face in today's evolving food production industry. Shook attorneys work with some of the world's largest food, beverage and agribusiness companies to establish preventative measures, conduct internal audits, develop public relations strategies, and advance tort reform initiatives.

Close