Four consumers have filed a putative class action against Barilla S.p.A.
alleging the company sells its specialty pasta and standard pasta products
in nearly identical boxes but underfills the specialty boxes, amounting to
unpermitted slack fill. Berni v. Barilla S.p.A., No. 4196 (E.D.N.Y., filed
July 28, 2016).

In addition to its traditional pasta products, Barilla sells gluten-free,
“Protein Plus” and whole-grain varieties of pasta. The specialty and
traditional pastas appear to be sold in similar amounts, the complaint
asserts, but the specialty boxes actually contain less pasta—while one
box of penne contains 454 grams, for example, the “Protein Plus” variety
contains 411 grams and the gluten-free version contains 340 grams,
despite being sold in similarly sized boxes. This discrepancy results in the
specialty boxes including about 10 to 25 percent non-functional slack fill,
the plaintiffs allege. For an alleged violation of the New York Business
Code and an unjust enrichment claim, the plaintiffs seek class certification,
restitution, attorney’s fees and an injunction requiring Barilla to
repackage the pastas.

 

Issue 613

About The Author

For decades, manufacturers, distributors and retailers at every link in the food chain have come to Shook, Hardy & Bacon to partner with a legal team that understands the issues they face in today's evolving food production industry. Shook attorneys work with some of the world's largest food, beverage and agribusiness companies to establish preventative measures, conduct internal audits, develop public relations strategies, and advance tort reform initiatives.

Close