The European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) Panel on Additives and Products or Substances Used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) has issued guidance to assist applicants “in the preparation and submission of technical dossiers for the renewal of the authorization of additives for use in animal nutrition.” According to EFSA, EU regulations require applicants to renew feed additive authorizations every 10 years by submitting stand-alone dossiers that take into account “the most up-to-date scientific knowledge” as well as “the current scientific/methodological approaches.” Although the information included in each dossier will depend on “the additive nature, the functional group, the substance itself, the target animals, and the conditions of use,” the submission must enable regulators to assess the additive in question “based on the current state of knowledge” and to determine whether the additive complies with the “fundamental principles for the renewal of authorization.” “During the last years, the FEEDAP Panel has developed several guidance…
Tag Archives animal feeds
The European Commission-Joint Research Centre and Institute of Food Safety of the University of Wageningen in The Netherlands, at the request of the European Food Safety Authority, have issued a two-part survey regarding nanomaterials in agri-food-feed applications that aims to collect information about (i) the current and potential future use of nanomaterials or nanotechnology in agri-food-feed applications, and (ii) regulation, safety assessment and reporting of nanomaterials in different countries. The first part of the survey focuses on the “Production, Use, Import, Research and Development of Nanomaterials in Agri-Food-Feed Applications” and is addressed to (i) companies that produce, import or use the materials in such applications, and (ii) research institutes, research and development departments of industry, or others active in research and development of materials or products containing nanomaterials in agri-food-feed applications. The second part of the survey focuses on the “Regulation and Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials in Agri-Food-Feed Applications” and…
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced an information collection requiring “renderers, feed manufacturers, and others involved in feed and feed ingredient manufacturing and distribution to maintain written procedures specifying the cleanout procedures or other means, and specifying the procedures for separating products that contain or may contain protein derived from mammalian tissue from all other protein products from the time of receipt until the time of shipment.”Intended to ensure compliance with regulations that prohibit certain animal proteins in ruminant feed to prevent the spread of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, the information collection will allow inspection personnel to confirm that an individual firm’s written procedures have been followed at the time of inspection. FDA has estimated that this information collection will involve an average annual burden of 14 hours per recordkeeping. Comments are requested by September 26, 2013. See Federal Register, August 17, 2013.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) Office of Inspector General (OIG) has released a July 2013 audit report examining how the Agricultural Marketing Service’s (AMS’s) National Organic Program (NOP) established the “access to pasture” rule for organic dairy cattle. Although OIG generally found that the new rules for organic milk production were “successfully implemented,” it nevertheless recommended that AMS clarify guidance for certifying agents “to ensure that all dairy producers are being treated consistently.” To this end, the audit noted that NOP (i) “had not clearly defined how producers should demarcate herds of organic milk-producing cattle, which meant that some certifying agents allowed producers to add cattle to organic herds,” and (ii) “needs to include organic feed brokers within the NOP-certification process to ensure that organic feed is not commingled or contaminated.” OIG also reported that certifying agents failed to take consistent enforcement actions “when their inspectors or reviewers identified…
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published new guidance on Salmonella-contaminated food for animals. Titled “Compliance Policy Guide Sec. 690.800 Salmonella in Food for Animals” (CPG), the guidance finalizes the draft CPG that was announced in August 2010 and includes the following changes: (i) the title has changed from “Salmonella in Animal Feed” to “Salmonella in Food for Animals” to clarify that it covers all animal food, including pet food and animal feed, and (ii) the term “direct human contact animal feed” has been replaced with the term “pet food” and includes treats and chews. FDA has also announced (i) the removal of 21 CFR 500.35 “Animal feeds contaminated with Salmonella microorganisms,” and (ii) the withdrawal of “Compliance Policy Guide Sec. 690.700 Salmonella Contamination of Dry Dog Food.” See Federal Register, July 16, 2013.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has launched two public consultations on draft guidance for feed additives. Issued by EFSA’s Panel on Additives and Products or Substances Used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), the first draft document offers guidance “for the preparation of dossiers for the renewal of the authorization for feed additives.” Under Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No. 1831/2003, FEEDAP currently requires applicants to renew feed additive permits every 10 years by providing enough technical information to “enable an assessment to be made of additives based on the current state of knowledge.” The panel has also requested feedback on draft guidance stemming from its updated assessment “of the toxigenic potential of Bacillus species used in animal nutrition.” According to EFSA, “Bacillus species are used in animal production directly as microbial feed additives or as the source of other feed additives, notably enzymes,” although certain strains—such as those in the…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) Food Safety and Inspection Service has reportedly approved a Non-GMO Project certification seal and “Non-GMO” statement on labels for products from animals that did not consume feed containing genetically modified (GM) ingredients, such as corn, soy and alfalfa. The certification will attest that the meat, poultry and liquid egg products meet the third-party certifying organization’s standards, which USDA vetted before approving the label. The agency action followed a petition filed by the owner of Mindful Meats, which makes and sells organic grass-fed beef to Northern California restaurants and retailers, and two other companies, Hidden Villa Ranch and Pitman Farms. According to Mindful Meats’ statement, “this is the first time that a U.S. government agency has approved a non-GMO label for beef.” See The New York Times, June 20, 2013; Mindful Meats Blog, June 21, 2013.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a final rule that amends the regulations for “irradiation of animal feed and pet food to provide for the safe use of electron beam and x-ray sources for irradiation of poultry feed and poultry feed ingredients.” The revised rule states that ionizing radiation is limited to (i) “gamma rays from sealed units of cobalt-60 or cesium-137”; (ii) “electrons generated from machine sources at energy levels not to exceed 10 million electron volts”; (iii) “x-rays generated from machine sources at energies not to exceed 5 million electron volts”; and (iv) “x-rays generated from machine sources using tantalum or gold as the target material and using energies not to exceed 7.5 (MeV).” See Federal Register, May 10, 2013.
During oral argument before a Second Circuit Court of Appeals panel, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reportedly argued that it had “no obligation” to complete proceedings that the agency initiated to withdraw approval from certain uses of antibiotic drugs in livestock. Natural Res. Def. Council v. FDA, No. 12-2106 (2d Cir., argued February 8, 2013). Assistant U.S. Attorney Ellen London said, “It’s completely discretionary as to when to enforce the law as to certain drugs,” in urging the court to reverse a district court order requiring it to hold the withdrawal proceedings announced in 1977 notices. According to a news source, one of the panel judges appeared to agree with FDA’s position, suggesting that it could, in theory, be forced to divert resources from high priorities on the basis of lawsuits filed against it. More information about lower court rulings in the case appear in Issues 432 and 442 of this…
Russia has reportedly imposed a ban on U.S. turkey imports, effective February 11, 2013, thus extending a ban on pork and beef imports in an ongoing dispute over the use of growth stimulant ractopamine in animal feed. According to a news source, Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (VPSS) made the decision after repeated warnings from Russian authorities about continual breaches of Russian rules banning the presence of the chemical—believed to cause health problems in humans—in food. The Codex Alimentarius Commission has apparently determined that the chemical is not harmful to humans when present in meat at low levels, but that has not stopped some countries, such as Russia and China, from banning it. “Since the violations continue and we are finding ractopamine in meat shipments from the USA, we plan starting February 11 to impose restrictions on the import of this product,” VPSS Chief Sergei Dankvert said. The…
