Tag Archives food safety/FSMA

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has requested public comments on the information collection provisions of regulations that “require registration for domestic and foreign facilities that manufacture, process, pack, or hold food for human or animal consumption in the United States.” According to FDA, the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 requires food facilities to provide information via Form FDA 3537 (§1.231) or the electronic Food Facility Registration Module that will support FDA’s enforcement activities and help the agency issue notifications in the event of accidental or deliberate contamination. In 2011, the Food Safety Modernization Act amended these regulations to compel facilities to renew their registrations biennially and to submit additional information, such as “the email address for the contact person of a domestic facility and the email address of the U.S. agent for a foreign facility.” Based on the registrations received in previous years,…

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed two new food safety rules addressing foodborne illness prevention and produce safety under the Food Safety Modernization Act. According to FDA, the first rule would require both foreign and domestic food manufacturers “to develop a formal plan for preventing their food products from causing foodborne illness” and to establish plans “for correcting any problems that arise.” The second rule proposes “enforceable safety standards for the production and harvesting of produce on farms,” including “science- and risk-based standards for the safe production and harvesting of fruits and vegetables.” Before drafting the rules, FDA apparently conducted “extensive outreach” involving the produce industry, consumers, other government agencies, and the international community. It will accept comments on both rules until May 16, 2013, and plans to issue further proposals addressing the safety and oversight of imported foods. “We know one-size-fits-all rules won’t work,” said FDA Deputy…

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued a report recommending that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revise its approach when comparing foreign food safety systems with the U.S. system to better ensure the safety of imported food. Under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, FDA’s enhanced oversight of food imports includes express authority to implement a system for accrediting third parties like foreign governments and private auditing firms to certify foreign food facilities’ compliance with U.S. food safety requirements. The agency has apparently faced some challenges doing so. According to GAO, FDA has already started assessing selected foreign food safety systems to determine if they provide the same level of public health protection as domestic resources. But FDA has also stated “that it needs new approaches to improve its oversight of imported food that take into account the entire food supply chain and that it needs to push prevention…

While foreign and domestic food facilities, including farms, must renew their registrations with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) beginning October 1, 2012, under the Food Safety Modernization Act, the agency is not accepting registration renewals at this time. Facilities required to be registered under the law are asked to check FDA’s website to learn when the system becomes available,

The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics will sponsor a conference in Atlanta, Georgia, October 10-12, 2012, that will focus in part on food-related issues. The “Public Health law Conference 2012: Practical Approaches to Critical Challenges,” event will include concurrent sessions titled (i) “If Sugar Is Addictive, What Does It Mean for the Law?,” including panelist Ashley Gearhardt, who has written on this topic with the Rudd Center’s Kelly Brownell in Biological Psychiatry; (ii) “Hot Topics in Preemption—From Fast Food to Fire Sprinklers to Safety Nets,” including panelist Mark Pertschuk, who actively promoted nonsmokers’ rights from 1987-2007; and (iii) “Enhancing the Safety of What We Eat: FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act,” including panelist Bruce Clark, an attorney with the Marler Clark firm which focuses its practice on food-contamination lawsuits.

The Center for Food Safety and Center for Environmental Health have filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) alleging that the agency has unlawfully delayed adopting implementing regulations under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). Ctr. for Food Safety v. Hamburg, No. 12-4529 (N.D. Cal., filed August 29, 2012). According to the complaint, FDA has missed seven statutory deadlines thus “failing to implement FSMA’s major food safety regulations.” Characterizing the failure as “an abdication of the agency’s fundamental responsibilities,” the plaintiffs claim that this delay “is putting millions of lives at risk from contracting foodborne illnesses.” They also sued the Office of Management and Budget, claiming that it has also missed statutory deadlines in failing to approve the implementing regulations that FDA has submitted for its review. The complaint recites Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that one in six Americans…

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued a July 26, 2012, report criticizing the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) efforts to implement a comprehensive food advisory and recall process. As directed by the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, GAO reportedly assessed the agency’s ability to order recalls and effectively inform consumers and retailers about food safety issues, concluding that although FDA has established internal procedures “describing the steps it will take to order a food recall ... these procedures are not yet public and the agency has not issued regulations or industry guidance to clarify its ordered food recall process.” In particular, the report faults FDA for failing to fashion “a comprehensive food recall communication policy and related implementation plans.” Noting that recent foodborne illness outbreaks have drawn national attention to food supply safety issues, GAO argues that FDA has not yet drafted measures to better manage its communication challenges or…

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has reportedly agreed to fund produce safety inspections through the end of 2012 despite the government’s failure to include the agency’s Microbiological Data Program (MDP) in next year’s budgets. According to media sources, neither the Obama administration nor Congress allocated resources for the 11-year-old program, which coordinates with local officials to screen alfalfa sprouts, cantaloupe, cilantro, hot peppers, lettuce, spinach, and tomatoes for pathogens such as E. coli (STEC), E. coli 0157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella. Responsible for 30 recalls since 2009, the MDP has garnered praise from consumer groups that have since decried its imminent demise while lambasting public officials for dispensing with the $5 million needed to keep the program running. “It’s a small sum of money in the government sense,” David Plunkett, senior staff attorney for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, told reporters. “For the government, it’s not…

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced a public meeting titled “International Capacity Building with Respect to Food Safety.” Scheduled for June 19, 2012, in Washington, D.C., the meeting will highlight “FDA’s comprehensive plan to expand the technical, scientific, and regulatory capacity of foreign governments and their respective food industries in countries that export foods to the United States.” Under the auspices of the Food Safety Modernization Act, the capacity-building plan seeks input from food industry representatives, federal and foreign government officials, consumer organizations, and other stakeholders. The plan seeks (i) “[r]ecommendations for bilateral and multilateral arrangements and agreements, including providing for responsibilities of exporting countries to ensure food safety”; (ii) “[p]rovisions for secure electronic data sharing”; (iii) “[p]rovisions for mutual recognition of inspection reports”; (iv) “[t]raining of foreign governments and food producers on U.S. requirements for safe food”; (v) “[r]ecommendations on whether and how to harmonize requirements under…

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued updated industry guidance “pertaining to the establishment and maintenance of records by persons who manufacture, process, pack, transport, distribute, receive, hold, or import food.” Although this fifth edition is effective immediately, FDA welcomes comments at any time. Requiring records that identify “immediate previous sources and the immediate subsequent recipients of food” along the food-distribution chain, FDA has been given expanded authority by the Food Safety and Modernization Act of 2011 to “access records relating to foods that may cause serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals.” Although the guidance incorporates these statutory changes, it has not deviated much from the fourth edition released in September 2006, FDA said. Rather, it provides practical information on such topics as records requirements, retention and availability, and “the consequences of failing to establish and maintain required records or failing to make required records…

Close